Literature DB >> 19027483

Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial.

Edward S Kim1, Vera Hirsh, Tony Mok, Mark A Socinski, Radj Gervais, Yi-Long Wu, Long-Yun Li, Claire L Watkins, Mark V Sellers, Elizabeth S Lowe, Yan Sun, Mei-Lin Liao, Kell Osterlind, Martin Reck, Alison A Armour, Frances A Shepherd, Scott M Lippman, Jean-Yves Douillard.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two phase II trials in patients with previously-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer suggested that gefitinib was efficacious and less toxic than was chemotherapy. We compared gefitinib with docetaxel in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer who had been pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy.
METHODS: We undertook an open-label phase III study with recruitment between March 1, 2004, and Feb 17, 2006, at 149 centres in 24 countries. 1466 patients with pretreated (>/=one platinum-based regimen) advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned with dynamic balancing to receive gefitinib (250 mg per day orally; n=733) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2) intravenously in 1-h infusion every 3 weeks; n=733). The primary objective was to compare overall survival between the groups with co-primary analyses to assess non-inferiority in the overall per-protocol population and superiority in patients with high epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-gene-copy number in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00076388.
FINDINGS: 1433 patients were analysed per protocol (723 in gefitinib group and 710 in docetaxel group). Non-inferiority of gefitinib compared with docetaxel was confirmed for overall survival (593 vs 576 events; hazard ratio [HR] 1.020, 96% CI 0.905-1.150, meeting the predefined non-inferiority criterion; median survival 7.6 vs 8.0 months). Superiority of gefitinib in patients with high EGFR-gene-copy number (85 vs 89 patients) was not proven (72 vs 71 events; HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p=0.62; median survival 8.4 vs 7.5 months). In the gefitinib group, the most common adverse events were rash or acne (360 [49%] vs 73 [10%]) and diarrhoea (255 [35%] vs 177 [25%]); whereas in the docetaxel group, neutropenia (35 [5%] vs 514 [74%]), asthenic disorders (182 [25%] vs 334 [47%]), and alopecia (23 [3%] vs 254 [36%]) were most common.
INTERPRETATION: INTEREST established non-inferior survival of gefitinib compared with docetaxel, suggesting that gefitinib is a valid treatment for pretreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19027483     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61758-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  428 in total

1.  Integrating molecular diagnostics into anticancer drug discovery.

Authors:  István Peták; Richárd Schwab; László Orfi; László Kopper; György Kéri
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Second-line epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors followed by third-line pemetrexed or the reverse sequence: a retrospective analysis of 83 Chinese patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tingting Hong; Ruxia Zhang; Dongyan Cai; Xiaohong Wu; Dong Hua
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials.

Authors:  Ryoichi Yano; Aya Konno; Kyohei Watanabe; Hitoshi Tsukamoto; Yuichiro Kayano; Hiroaki Ohnaka; Nobuyuki Goto; Toshiaki Nakamura; Mikio Masada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The role of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Pei-Jye Voon; Byoung Chul Cho; Wee-Lee Yeo; Ross A Soo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Hurdles in anticancer drug development from a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Bertil Jonsson; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Second-line erlotinib in an EGFR mutation-negative patient with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vera Hirsh
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Personalized medicine in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: promising targets and current clinical trials.

Authors:  A Black; D Morris
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Phase II study of gefitinib in patients with advanced salivary gland cancers.

Authors:  John A Jakob; Merrill S Kies; Bonnie S Glisson; Michael E Kupferman; Diane D Liu; J Jack Lee; Adel K El-Naggar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; George R Blumenschein
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.147

9.  Erlotinib therapy after initial platinum doublet therapy in patients with EGFR wild type non-small cell lung cancer: results of a combined patient-level analysis of the NCIC CTG BR.21 and SATURN trials.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Federico Cappuzzo; Tudor Ciuleanu; Larry Leon; Barbara Klughammer
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Efficacy of second-line treatment and importance of comorbidity scores and clinical parameters affecting prognosis in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer without epidermal growth factor receptor mutations.

Authors:  Sung Yong Lee; Eun Joo Kang; Suk Young Lee; Hong Jun Kim; Kyung Hoon Min; Gyu Young Hur; Jae Jeong Shim; Kyung Ho Kang; Sang Cheul Oh; Jae Hong Seo; Jun Suk Kim
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.