Zhigang Wei1, Tongtong An1, Zhijie Wang1, Keneng Chen2, Hua Bai1, Guangying Zhu3, Jianchun Duan1, Meina Wu1, Lu Yang1, Minglei Zhuo1, Yuyan Wang1, Xuyi Liu1, Jie Wang1. 1. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute Beijing, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute Beijing, China. 3. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiology, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital & Institute Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Multiple prospective studies have demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 and exon 21 mutations are the most powerful predictive biomarkers of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are few studies focused on patients with double mutations compared with a single mutation. METHODS: We retrospectively screened 1,525 samples of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent EGFR mutation detections in tumor tissues at Peking University Cancer Hospital between February 2006 and March 2011. Thirty-two cases harboring double mutations were included in this study. The Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis for prognostic factors of survival was applied. RESULTS: Patients with double mutations accounted for 2.1% (32/1525) of the overall tested samples. Double mutations were more common in female, adenocarcinoma, non-smokers, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG0)-1 and stage IV patients. Twenty-one patients with double mutations were treated with EGFR-TKIs. The objective response rate (ORR) was 23.8%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 76.2%. In the first-line therapy, the ORR was 16.7%, and the DCR was 66.7%. In univariate analysis, gender, smoking-status, TKI type and TKI response were correlated with progression-free survival, and patients with ECOG 0-1 had longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with double mutations had a low objective response rate when treated with EGFR-TKIs compared with single EGFR exon 19 or exon 21 mutations.
BACKGROUND: Multiple prospective studies have demonstrated that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 and exon 21 mutations are the most powerful predictive biomarkers of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there are few studies focused on patients with double mutations compared with a single mutation. METHODS: We retrospectively screened 1,525 samples of Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent EGFR mutation detections in tumor tissues at Peking University Cancer Hospital between February 2006 and March 2011. Thirty-two cases harboring double mutations were included in this study. The Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis for prognostic factors of survival was applied. RESULTS:Patients with double mutations accounted for 2.1% (32/1525) of the overall tested samples. Double mutations were more common in female, adenocarcinoma, non-smokers, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG0)-1 and stage IV patients. Twenty-one patients with double mutations were treated with EGFR-TKIs. The objective response rate (ORR) was 23.8%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 76.2%. In the first-line therapy, the ORR was 16.7%, and the DCR was 66.7%. In univariate analysis, gender, smoking-status, TKI type and TKI response were correlated with progression-free survival, and patients with ECOG 0-1 had longer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with double mutations had a low objective response rate when treated with EGFR-TKIs compared with single EGFR exon 19 or exon 21 mutations.
Authors: V Rusch; J Baselga; C Cordon-Cardo; J Orazem; M Zaman; S Hoda; J McIntosh; J Kurie; E Dmitrovsky Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1993-05-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Fred R Hirsch; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Paul A Bunn; Wilbur A Franklin; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Nick Thatcher; Alex Chang; Purvish Parikh; José Rodrigues Pereira; Tudor Ciuleanu; Joachim von Pawel; Claire Watkins; Angela Flannery; Gillian Ellison; Emma Donald; Lucy Knight; Dinah Parums; Nicholas Botwood; Brian Holloway Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rafael Rosell; Teresa Moran; Cristina Queralt; Rut Porta; Felipe Cardenal; Carlos Camps; Margarita Majem; Guillermo Lopez-Vivanco; Dolores Isla; Mariano Provencio; Amelia Insa; Bartomeu Massuti; Jose Luis Gonzalez-Larriba; Luis Paz-Ares; Isabel Bover; Rosario Garcia-Campelo; Miguel Angel Moreno; Silvia Catot; Christian Rolfo; Noemi Reguart; Ramon Palmero; José Miguel Sánchez; Roman Bastus; Clara Mayo; Jordi Bertran-Alamillo; Miguel Angel Molina; Jose Javier Sanchez; Miquel Taron Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory J Riely; William Pao; Duykhanh Pham; Allan R Li; Naiyer Rizvi; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Maureen F Zakowski; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Hua Bai; Li Mao; Hang Shu Wang; Jun Zhao; Lu Yang; Tong Tong An; Xin Wang; Chun Jian Duan; Na Mei Wu; Zhi Qing Guo; Yi Xu Liu; Hong Ning Liu; Ye Yu Wang; Jie Wang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Min Peng; Yi Ming Weng; Hua Li Liu; Gui Fang Yang; Yi Yao; Guang Han; Qi Bin Song Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 3.411