Literature DB >> 26766894

A critical evaluation of material safety data sheets (MSDSs) for engineered nanomaterials.

Adrienne Eastlake1, Laura Hodson2, Charles Geraci3, Carlos Crawford1.   

Abstract

Material safety data sheets (MSDSs) provide employers, employees, emergency responders, and the general public with basic information about the hazards associated with chemicals that are used in the workplace and are a part of every-day commerce. They are a primary information resource used by health, safety, and environmental professionals in communicating the hazards of chemicals and in making risk management decisions. Engineered nanomaterials represent a growing class of materials being manufactured and introduced into multiple business sectors. MSDSs were obtained from a total of 44 manufacturers using Internet search engines, and a simple ranking scheme was developed to evaluate the content of the data sheets. The MSDSs were reviewed using the ranking scheme, and categorized on the quality and completeness of information as it pertains to hazard identification, exposure controls, personal protective equipment (PPE), and toxicological information being communicated about the engineered nanomaterial. The ranking scheme used to evaluate the MSDSs for engineered nanomaterials was based on the determination that the data sheet should include information on specific physical properties, including particle size or particle size distribution, and physical form; specific toxicological and health effects; and protective measures that can be taken to control potential exposures. The first MSDSs for nanomaterials began to appear around 2006, so these were collected in the time period of 2007-2008. Comparison of MSDSs and changes over time were evaluated as MSDSs were obtained again in 2010-2011. The majority (67%) of the MSDSs obtained in 2010-2011 still provided insufficient data for communicating the potential hazards of engineered nanomaterials.

Year:  2012        PMID: 26766894      PMCID: PMC4707963          DOI: 10.1016/j.jchas.2012.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Health Saf        ISSN: 1074-9098


  22 in total

1.  Carboxyl-modified single-walled carbon nanotubes selectively induce human telomeric i-motif formation.

Authors:  Xi Li; Yinghua Peng; Jinsong Ren; Xiaogang Qu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ROS-mediated genotoxicity induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in human epidermal cells.

Authors:  Ritesh K Shukla; Vyom Sharma; Alok K Pandey; Shashi Singh; Sarwat Sultana; Alok Dhawan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Proinflammogenic effects of low-toxicity and metal nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro: highlighting the role of particle surface area and surface reactivity.

Authors:  Rodger Duffin; Lang Tran; David Brown; Vicki Stone; Ken Donaldson
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Implications of silver nanoparticle induced cell apoptosis for in vitro gene therapy.

Authors:  P Gopinath; Sonit Kumar Gogoi; Arun Chattopadhyay; Siddhartha Sankar Ghosh
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.874

5.  Understanding and using the MSDS. Material Safety Data Sheets.

Authors:  C J Solomon
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  1988-09

6.  Size-dependent proinflammatory effects of ultrafine polystyrene particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced activity of ultrafines.

Authors:  D M Brown; M R Wilson; W MacNee; V Stone; K Donaldson
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Comprehensibility of material safety data sheets.

Authors:  P Kolp; B Sattler; M Blayney; T Sherwood
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Influence of particle surface area on the toxicity of insoluble manganese dioxide dusts.

Authors:  D Lison; C Lardot; F Huaux; G Zanetti; B Fubini
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Pulmonary toxicity of single-wall carbon nanotubes in mice 7 and 90 days after intratracheal instillation.

Authors:  Chiu-Wing Lam; John T James; Richard McCluskey; Robert L Hunter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2003-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Mouse pulmonary dose- and time course-responses induced by exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Dale W Porter; Ann F Hubbs; Robert R Mercer; Nianqiang Wu; Michael G Wolfarth; Krishnan Sriram; Stephen Leonard; Lori Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sherry Friend; Michael Andrew; Bean T Chen; Shuji Tsuruoka; Morinobu Endo; Vincent Castranova
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 4.221

View more
  5 in total

1.  Control Banding Tools for Engineered Nanoparticles: What the Practitioner Needs to Know.

Authors:  Kevin H Dunn; Adrienne C Eastlake; Michael Story; Eileen D Kuempel
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 2.179

2.  Comparison of product safety data sheet ingredient lists with skin irritants and sensitizers present in a convenience sample of light-curing resins used in additive manufacturing.

Authors:  Lauren N Bowers; Anand C Ranpara; Katherine A Roach; Alycia K Knepp; Elizabeth D Arnold; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; M Abbas Virji
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0).

Authors:  Adrienne C Eastlake; Catherine Beaucham; Kenneth F Martinez; Matthew M Dahm; Christopher Sparks; Laura L Hodson; Charles L Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Proposal of a new risk assessment method for the handling of powders and nanomaterials.

Authors:  Laurent Gridelet; Philippe Delbecq; Laurent Hervé; Pierre Boissolle; Dominique Fleury; Sophie Kowal; Guillaume Fayet
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.179

5.  What Do Safety Data Sheets for Artificial Stone Products Tell Us About Composition? A Comparative Analysis with Physicochemical Data.

Authors:  Chellan Kumarasamy; Dino Pisaniello; Sharyn Gaskin; Tony Hall
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2022-08-07       Impact factor: 2.779

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.