Y Liu1, J Sareen2, J M Bolton2, J L Wang3. 1. Departments of Psychiatry and of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6. Electronic address: liuy@ucalgary.ca. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, PZ430-771 Bannatyne Avenue Winnipeg, MB, Canada R3E 3N4. 3. Departments of Psychiatry and of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Mathison Centre for Mental Health Research & Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation is one of the strongest predictors of recent and future suicide attempt. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction algorithm for the recurrence of suicidal ideation among population with low mood METHODS: 3035 participants from U.S National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions with suicidal ideation at their lowest mood at baseline were included. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, based on the DSM-IV criteria was used. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to derive the algorithm. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and validation cohorts. RESULTS: In the development data, the proportion of recurrent suicidal ideation over 3 years was 19.5 (95% CI: 17.7, 21.5). The developed algorithm consisted of 6 predictors: age, feelings of emptiness, sudden mood changes, self-harm history, depressed mood in the past 4 weeks, interference with social activities in the past 4 weeks because of physical health or emotional problems and emptiness was the most important risk factor. The model had good discriminative power (C statistic=0.8273, 95% CI: 0.8027, 0.8520). The C statistic was 0.8091 (95% CI: 0.7786, 0.8395) in the external validation dataset and was 0.8193 (95% CI: 0.8001, 0.8385) in the combined dataset. LIMITATIONS: This study does not apply to people with suicidal ideation who are not depressed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed risk algorithm for predicting the recurrence of suicidal ideation has good discrimination and excellent calibration. Clinicians can use this algorithm to stratify the risk of recurrence in patients and thus improve personalized treatment approaches, make advice and further intensive monitoring.
BACKGROUND: Suicidal ideation is one of the strongest predictors of recent and future suicide attempt. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk prediction algorithm for the recurrence of suicidal ideation among population with low mood METHODS: 3035 participants from U.S National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions with suicidal ideation at their lowest mood at baseline were included. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, based on the DSM-IV criteria was used. Logistic regression modeling was conducted to derive the algorithm. Discrimination and calibration were assessed in the development and validation cohorts. RESULTS: In the development data, the proportion of recurrent suicidal ideation over 3 years was 19.5 (95% CI: 17.7, 21.5). The developed algorithm consisted of 6 predictors: age, feelings of emptiness, sudden mood changes, self-harm history, depressed mood in the past 4 weeks, interference with social activities in the past 4 weeks because of physical health or emotional problems and emptiness was the most important risk factor. The model had good discriminative power (C statistic=0.8273, 95% CI: 0.8027, 0.8520). The C statistic was 0.8091 (95% CI: 0.7786, 0.8395) in the external validation dataset and was 0.8193 (95% CI: 0.8001, 0.8385) in the combined dataset. LIMITATIONS: This study does not apply to people with suicidal ideation who are not depressed. CONCLUSIONS: The developed risk algorithm for predicting the recurrence of suicidal ideation has good discrimination and excellent calibration. Clinicians can use this algorithm to stratify the risk of recurrence in patients and thus improve personalized treatment approaches, make advice and further intensive monitoring.
Authors: Philippe Mortier; Glenn Kiekens; Randy P Auerbach; Pim Cuijpers; Koen Demyttenaere; Jennifer G Green; Ronald C Kessler; Matthew K Nock; Alan M Zaslavsky; Ronny Bruffaerts Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Boris Birmaher; John A Merranko; Mary Kay Gill; Danella Hafeman; Tina Goldstein; Benjamin Goldstein; Heather Hower; Michael Strober; David Axelson; Neal Ryan; Shirley Yen; Rasim Diler; Satish Iyengar; Michael W Kattan; Lauren Weinstock; Martin Keller Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Marcos DelPozo-Banos; Ann John; Nicolai Petkov; Damon Mark Berridge; Kate Southern; Keith LLoyd; Caroline Jones; Sarah Spencer; Carlos Manuel Travieso Journal: JMIR Ment Health Date: 2018-06-22
Authors: Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Erich Studerus; Julio Vaquerizo-Serrano; Jessica Irving; Ana Catalan; Dominic Oliver; Helen Baldwin; Andrea Danese; Seena Fazel; Ewout W Steyerberg; Daniel Stahl; Paolo Fusar-Poli Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 9.306