Literature DB >> 26764958

LEAN thinking in Finnish healthcare.

Tapani Jorma1, Hanna Tiirinki, Risto Bloigu, Leena Turkki.   

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to evaluate how LEAN thinking is used as a management and development tool in the Finnish public healthcare system and what kind of outcomes have been achieved or expected by using it. The main focus is in managing and developing patient and treatment processes. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed-method approach incorporating the Webropol survey was used. Findings - LEAN is quite a new concept in Finnish public healthcare. It is mainly used as a development tool to seek financial savings and to improve the efficiency of patient processes, but has not yet been deeply implemented. However, the experiences from LEAN initiatives have been positive, and the methodology is already quite well-known. It can be concluded that, because of positive experiences from LEAN, the environment in Finnish healthcare is ready for the deeper implementation of LEAN. Originality/value - This paper evaluates the usage of LEAN thinking for the first time in the public healthcare system of Finland as a development tool and a management system. It highlights the implementation and achieved results of LEAN thinking when used in the healthcare environment. It also highlights the expectations for LEAN thinking in Finnish public healthcare.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Development tool; Finnish healthcare system; Healthcare process; Hospital services; LEAN thinking; Primary healthcare

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26764958     DOI: 10.1108/LHS-08-2015-0021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl)        ISSN: 1751-1879


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of an Access-Risk-Knowledge (ARK) Platform for Governance of Risk and Change in Complex Socio-Technical Systems.

Authors:  Nick McDonald; Lucy McKenna; Rebecca Vining; Brian Doyle; Junli Liang; Marie E Ward; Pernilla Ulfvengren; Una Geary; John Guilfoyle; Arwa Shuhaiber; Julio Hernandez; Mary Fogarty; Una Healy; Christopher Tallon; Rob Brennan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Lean thinking: using 6S and visual management for efficient adverse event closure.

Authors:  Ziad Alzahrani
Journal:  BMJ Open Qual       Date:  2021-01

3.  Benchmarking outcomes on multiple contextual levels in lean healthcare: a systematic review, development of a conceptual framework, and a research agenda.

Authors:  Elina Reponen; Thomas G Rundall; Stephen M Shortell; Janet C Blodgett; Angelica Juarez; Ritva Jokela; Markku Mäkijärvi; Paulus Torkki
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Developing New Methods for Person-Centred Approaches to Adjudicate Context-Mechanism-Outcome Configurations in Realist Evaluation.

Authors:  Seán Paul Teeling; Jan Dewing; Deborah Baldie
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Releasing Operating Room Nursing Time to Care through the Reduction of Surgical Case Preparation Time: A Lean Six Sigma Pilot Study.

Authors:  Patricia Egan; Anthony Pierce; Audrey Flynn; Sean Paul Teeling; Marie Ward; Martin McNamara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.