Literature DB >> 26763897

Comparison of Antagonist Muscle Activity During Walking Between Total Knee Replacement and Control Subjects Using Unnormalized Electromyography.

Hannah J Lundberg1, Idubijes L Rojas2, Kharma C Foucher3, Markus A Wimmer1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although satisfactory outcomes have been reported after total knee replacement (TKR), full recovery of muscle strength and physical function is rare. We developed a relative activation index (RAI) to compare leg muscle activity from unnormalized surface electromyography (sEMG) between TKR and control subjects.
METHODS: Nineteen TKR and 19 control subjects underwent gait analysis and sEMG. RAIs were calculated by dividing the average sEMG for 2 consecutive subphases of stance defined by the direction of the external sagittal plane moment (flexion or extension).
RESULTS: RAIs and external moments indicate TKR subjects have less initial stance antagonist rectus femoris activity (P = .004), greater middle stance antagonist biceps femoris activity (P < .001), and less late stance agonist biceps femoris activity (P < .001) than control subjects. Individuals with TKR demonstrate increased flexor muscle activation during weight bearing, potentially contributing to altered gait patterns found during the stance phase of gait.
CONCLUSION: The RAI helps detail whether decreased external moments correspond to less agonist or more antagonist muscle activity to determine true muscle activity differences between subject groups. Identifying the mechanisms underlying altered muscle function both before and after TKR is critical for developing rehabilitation strategies to address functional deficits and disability found in this patient population.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gait analysis; muscle co-contraction; surface electromyography; total knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26763897      PMCID: PMC4879608          DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  34 in total

1.  Alterations in neuromuscular patterns between pre and one-year post-total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; Gillian L Hatfield; Janie L Astephen Wilson; Michael J Dunbar
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 2.  Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jodie A McClelland; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Relationship between pain and medial knee joint loading in mild radiographic knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Laura E Thorp; Dale R Sumner; Markus A Wimmer; Joel A Block
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-10-15

4.  Detection of onset and termination of muscle activity in surface electromyograms.

Authors:  J H Abbink; A van der Bilt; H W van der Glas
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 5.  Gait biomechanics and total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T P Andriacchi; D E Hurwitz
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

6.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation.

Authors:  Ryan L Mizner; Stephanie C Petterson; Jennifer E Stevens; Krista Vandenborne; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects.

Authors:  M Walsh; L J Woodhouse; S G Thomas; E Finch
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-03

9.  A prospective observational study of falling before and after knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  Annette Swinkels; John H Newman; Theresa J Allain
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 10.668

10.  Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty: systematic review.

Authors:  Robson Rocha da Silva; Ayrton André Melo Santos; José de Sampaio Carvalho Júnior; Marcos Almeida Matos
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2014-09-19
View more
  4 in total

1.  Slow gait speed after bilateral total knee arthroplasty is associated with suboptimal improvement of knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Du Hyun Ro; Hyuk-Soo Han; Dong Yeon Lee; Seong Hwan Kim; Yoon-Ho Kwak; Myung Chul Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A Systematic Review of the Associations Between Inverse Dynamics and Musculoskeletal Modeling to Investigate Joint Loading in a Clinical Environment.

Authors:  Jana Holder; Ursula Trinler; Andrea Meurer; Felix Stief
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Bi-unicondylar arthroplasty : a biomechanics and clinical outcomes study.

Authors:  Amy J Garner; Oliver W Dandridge; Andrew A Amis; Justin P Cobb; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 5.853

4.  Knee biomechanics of patients with total knee replacement during downhill walking on different slopes.

Authors:  Chen Wen; Harold E Cates; Joshua T Weinhandl; Scott E Crouter; Songning Zhang
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.