Literature DB >> 26763586

Controlled multi-arm platform design using predictive probability.

Brian P Hobbs1, Nan Chen1, J Jack Lee1.   

Abstract

The process of screening agents one-at-a-time under the current clinical trials system suffers from several deficiencies that could be addressed in order to extend financial and patient resources. In this article, we introduce a statistical framework for designing and conducting randomized multi-arm screening platforms with binary endpoints using Bayesian modeling. In essence, the proposed platform design consolidates inter-study control arms, enables investigators to assign more new patients to novel therapies, and accommodates mid-trial modifications to the study arms that allow both dropping poorly performing agents as well as incorporating new candidate agents. When compared to sequentially conducted randomized two-arm trials, screening platform designs have the potential to yield considerable reductions in cost, alleviate the bottleneck between phase I and II, eliminate bias stemming from inter-trial heterogeneity, and control for multiplicity over a sequence of a priori planned studies. When screening five experimental agents, our results suggest that platform designs have the potential to reduce the mean total sample size by as much as 40% and boost the mean overall response rate by as much as 15%. We explain how to design and conduct platform designs to achieve the aforementioned aims and preserve desirable frequentist properties for the treatment comparisons. In addition, we demonstrate how to conduct a platform design using look-up tables that can be generated in advance of the study. The gains in efficiency facilitated by platform design could prove to be consequential in oncologic settings, wherein trials often lack a proper control, and drug development suffers from low enrollment, long inter-trial latency periods, and an unacceptably high rate of failure in phase III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; multi-arm controlled clinical trial design; multiple comparisons; predictive probability; sequential design

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26763586      PMCID: PMC5039108          DOI: 10.1177/0962280215620696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  34 in total

1.  Optimal sample sizes for phase II clinical trials and pilot studies.

Authors:  Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Pathological complete response and accelerated drug approval in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Tatiana M Prowell; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  A national cancer clinical trials system for the 21st century: reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program.

Authors:  John F Scoggins; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  Multi-arm clinical trials of new agents: some design considerations.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Edward L Korn; Robert Gray; Alison Martin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  R Simon
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1989-03

6.  The design of phase II clinical trials testing cancer therapeutics: consensus recommendations from the clinical trial design task force of the national cancer institute investigational drug steering committee.

Authors:  Lesley Seymour; S Percy Ivy; Daniel Sargent; David Spriggs; Laurence Baker; Larry Rubinstein; Mark J Ratain; Michael Le Blanc; David Stewart; John Crowley; Susan Groshen; Jeffrey S Humphrey; Pamela West; Donald Berry
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials.

Authors:  T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Innovative Clinical Trials: The LUNG-MAP Study.

Authors:  C E Steuer; V Papadimitrakopoulou; R S Herbst; M W Redman; F R Hirsch; P C Mack; S S Ramalingam; D R Gandara
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; David J Stewart; Marshall E Hicks; Jeremy Erasmus; Sanjay Gupta; Christine M Alden; Suyu Liu; Ximing Tang; Fadlo R Khuri; Hai T Tran; Bruce E Johnson; John V Heymach; Li Mao; Frank Fossella; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Suzanne E Davis; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  How do multi-stage, multi-arm trials compare to the traditional two-arm parallel group design--a reanalysis of 4 trials.

Authors:  F M-S Barthel; M K B Parmar; P Royston
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  26 in total

1.  Simulation optimization for Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial with binary endpoints.

Authors:  Zhenning Yu; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Caitlyn Meinzer
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 1.051

2.  To add or not to add a new treatment arm to a multiarm study: A decision-theoretic framework.

Authors:  Kim May Lee; James Wason; Nigel Stallard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Emily C Zabor; Alexander M Kaizer; Brian P Hobbs
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 4.  Model-Assisted Designs for Early-Phase Clinical Trials: Simplicity Meets Superiority.

Authors:  Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

Review 5.  Early-Phase Platform Trials: A New Paradigm for Dose Finding and Treatment Screening in the Era of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Mei-Yin C Polley; Ying Kuen Cheung
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  Adding experimental arms to platform clinical trials: randomization procedures and interim analyses.

Authors:  Steffen Ventz; Matteo Cellamare; Giovanni Parmigiani; Lorenzo Trippa
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Bayesian clinical trials at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center: An update.

Authors:  Rebecca S Slack Tidwell; S Andrew Peng; Minxing Chen; Diane D Liu; Ying Yuan; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  A multi-source adaptive platform design for testing sequential combinatorial therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Alexander M Kaizer; Brian P Hobbs; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Statistical controversies in clinical research: basket trials, umbrella trials, and other master protocols: a review and examples.

Authors:  L A Renfro; D J Sargent
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  A group-sequential randomized trial design utilizing supplemental trial data.

Authors:  Ales Kotalik; David M Vock; Brian P Hobbs; Joseph S Koopmeiners
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.