W Dong1, Z Huang2. 1. Cardiology Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing, China. 2. College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways (CPs) have been viewed as a multidisciplinary tool to improve the quality and efficiency of evidence-based care. Despite widespread enthusiasm for CPs, research has shown that many CP initiatives are unsuccessful. To this end, this study provides a methodology to evaluate critical success factors (CSFs) that can aid healthcare organizations to achieve successful CP implementation. DESIGN: This study presents a new approach to evaluate CP implementation CSFs, with the aims being: (1) to identify CSFs for implementation of CPs through a comprehensive literature review and interviews with collaborative experts; (2) to use a filed study data with a robust fuzzy DEMATEL (the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) approach to visualize the structure of complicated causal relationships between CSFs and obtain the influence level of these factors. PARTICIPANTS: The filed study data is provided by ten clinical experts of a Chinese hospital. RESULTS: 23 identified CSF factors which are initially identified through a review of the literature and interviews with collaborative experts. Then, a number of direct and indirect relationships are derived from the data such that different perceptions can be integrated into a compromised cause and effect model of CP implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the proposed approach can systematically evaluate CSFs and realize the importance of each factor such that the most common causes of failure of CP implementation could be eliminated or avoided. Therefore, the tool proposed would help healthcare organizations to manage CP implementation in a more effective and proactive way.
OBJECTIVE: Clinical pathways (CPs) have been viewed as a multidisciplinary tool to improve the quality and efficiency of evidence-based care. Despite widespread enthusiasm for CPs, research has shown that many CP initiatives are unsuccessful. To this end, this study provides a methodology to evaluate critical success factors (CSFs) that can aid healthcare organizations to achieve successful CP implementation. DESIGN: This study presents a new approach to evaluate CP implementation CSFs, with the aims being: (1) to identify CSFs for implementation of CPs through a comprehensive literature review and interviews with collaborative experts; (2) to use a filed study data with a robust fuzzy DEMATEL (the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory) approach to visualize the structure of complicated causal relationships between CSFs and obtain the influence level of these factors. PARTICIPANTS: The filed study data is provided by ten clinical experts of a Chinese hospital. RESULTS: 23 identified CSF factors which are initially identified through a review of the literature and interviews with collaborative experts. Then, a number of direct and indirect relationships are derived from the data such that different perceptions can be integrated into a compromised cause and effect model of CP implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the proposed approach can systematically evaluate CSFs and realize the importance of each factor such that the most common causes of failure of CP implementation could be eliminated or avoided. Therefore, the tool proposed would help healthcare organizations to manage CP implementation in a more effective and proactive way.
Entities:
Keywords:
Clinical pathway implementation; cause and effect; critical success factors; fuzzy DEMATEL
Authors: Thomas Rotter; Leigh Kinsman; Erica James; Andreas Machotta; Jon Willis; Pamela Snow; Joachim Kugler Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Robert Lario; Steve Hasley; Stephen A White; Karen Eilbeck; Richard Soley; Stan Huff; Kensaku Kawamoto Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2021-01-25
Authors: Jonathan S Austrian; Frank Volpicelli; Simon Jones; Mitchell A Bernstein; Jane Padikkala; Ashley Bagheri; Saul Blecker Journal: Appl Clin Inform Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 2.342