| Literature DB >> 26763461 |
Yiping Fan1, Seungjae Lee2, Gang Wu1, John Easton1, Donald Yergeau1, Reinhard Dummer3, Peter Vogel2, John M Kirkwood4, Raymond L Barnhill5, Alberto Pappo6, Armita Bahrami7.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26763461 PMCID: PMC4731027 DOI: 10.1038/JID.2015.374
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551
Figure 1Association of the mutational status and the methylation profile of the TERT promoter with disease characteristics and outcome data for 23 patients with melanocytic tumors. The 26 CpG sites were aberrantly methylated in wild-type TERT promoter melanomas (the last 4 rows) but were predominantly unmethylated in low-grade or benign melanocytic tumors (atypical spitzoid neoplasms and GCN with proliferative nodules) and in mutant TERT promoter melanomas. Methylation panel color code: M, methylated; PM, partially methylated; PUM, partially unmethylated; UM, unmethylated; NA, not available.
Figure 2Photomicrographs (H&E–stained) and TERT mRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) for 2 melanomas in GCN (2 top panels) and 2 proliferative nodules in GCN (2 bottom panels). mRNA ISH shows numerous high-resolution red intracellular punctate signals in malignant melanocytes (c and f) and no signals above the background level in melanocytes of proliferative nodules (i and l). Scale bars= 1000 μm (a) and 50 μm (b).