Literature DB >> 26763250

Endometrial Carcinomas with POLE Exonuclease Domain Mutations Have a Favorable Prognosis.

Melissa K McConechy1, Aline Talhouk1, Samuel Leung2, Derek Chiu3, Winnie Yang1, Janine Senz1, Linda J Reha-Krantz4, Cheng-Han Lee5, David G Huntsman6, C Blake Gilks7, Jessica N McAlpine8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to confirm the prognostic significance of POLE exonuclease domain mutations (EDM) in endometrial carcinoma patients. In addition, the effect of treatment on POLE-mutated tumors was assessed. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A retrospective patient cohort of 496 endometrial carcinoma patients was identified for targeted sequencing of the POLE exonuclease domain, yielding 406 evaluable tumors. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the effect of POLE mutation status on progression-free survival (PFS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS). Combining results from eight studies in a meta-analysis, we computed pooled HR for PFS, DSS, and OS.
RESULTS: POLE EDMs were identified in 39 of 406 (9.6%) endometrial carcinomas. Women with POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas were younger, with stage I (92%) tumors, grade 3 (62%), endometrioid histology (82%), and frequent (49%) lymphovascular invasion. In univariable analysis, POLE-mutated endometrial carcinomas had significantly improved outcomes compared with patients with no EDMs for PFS, DSS, and OS. In multivariable analysis, POLE EDMs were only significantly associated with improved PFS. The effect of adjuvant treatment on POLE-mutated cases could not be determined conclusively; however, both treated and untreated patients with POLE EDMs had good outcomes. Meta-analysis revealed an association between POLE EDMs and improved PFS and DSS with pooled HRs 0.34 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.15-0.73] and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.13-0.92), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: POLE EDMs are prognostic markers associated with excellent outcomes for endometrial carcinoma patients. Further investigation is needed to conclusively determine if treatment is necessary for this group of women. Clin Cancer Res; 22(12); 2865-73. ©2016 AACR. ©2016 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26763250     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  48 in total

Review 1.  Chemotherapy for Endometrial Cancer in Adjuvant and Advanced Disease Settings.

Authors:  Christine M Bestvina; Gini F Fleming
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-13

2.  Extrauterine high-grade serous carcinomas with bilateral adnexal involvement as the only two disease sites are clonal based on tp53 sequencing results: implications for biology, classification, and staging.

Authors:  Naveena Singh; Asma Faruqi; Friedrich Kommoss; W Glenn McCluggage; Giorgia Trevisan; Janine Senz; Amy Lum; C Blake Gilks; Michael Anglesio
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Primum non nocere: Are we ready for POLE testing in endometrial cancer?

Authors:  Casey M Cosgrove; David E Cohn; Paul J Goodfellow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  The evolution of endometrial carcinoma classification through application of immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostics: past, present and future.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; August Vidal; Xavier Matias-Guiu; C Blake Gilks
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Proteogenomic Characterization of Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yongchao Dou; Emily A Kawaler; Daniel Cui Zhou; Marina A Gritsenko; Chen Huang; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Vladislav A Petyuk; Sara R Savage; Shankha Satpathy; Wenke Liu; Yige Wu; Chia-Feng Tsai; Bo Wen; Zhi Li; Song Cao; Jamie Moon; Zhiao Shi; MacIntosh Cornwell; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Rosalie K Chu; Suhas Vasaikar; Hua Zhou; Qingsong Gao; Ronald J Moore; Kai Li; Sunantha Sethuraman; Matthew E Monroe; Rui Zhao; David Heiman; Karsten Krug; Karl Clauser; Ramani Kothadia; Yosef Maruvka; Alexander R Pico; Amanda E Oliphant; Emily L Hoskins; Samuel L Pugh; Sean J I Beecroft; David W Adams; Jonathan C Jarman; Andy Kong; Hui-Yin Chang; Boris Reva; Yuxing Liao; Dmitry Rykunov; Antonio Colaprico; Xi Steven Chen; Andrzej Czekański; Marcin Jędryka; Rafał Matkowski; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Tara Hiltke; Emily Boja; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; David Mutch; Katherine Fuh; Matthew J Ellis; Deborah DeLair; Mathangi Thiagarajan; D R Mani; Gad Getz; Michael Noble; Alexey I Nesvizhskii; Pei Wang; Matthew L Anderson; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Samuel H Payne; Kelly V Ruggles; Karin D Rodland; Li Ding; Bing Zhang; Tao Liu; David Fenyö
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: rationale, practice and perspectives.

Authors:  Wenyu Cao; Xinyue Ma; Jean Victoria Fischer; Chenggong Sun; Beihua Kong; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Biomark Res       Date:  2021-06-16

7.  Molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma on diagnostic specimens is highly concordant with final hysterectomy: Earlier prognostic information to guide treatment.

Authors:  Aline Talhouk; Lien N Hoang; Melissa K McConechy; Quentin Nakonechny; Joyce Leo; Angela Cheng; Samuel Leung; Winnie Yang; Amy Lum; Martin Köbel; Cheng-Han Lee; Robert A Soslow; David G Huntsman; C Blake Gilks; Jessica N McAlpine
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Clinical outcomes of patients with POLE mutated endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Marina Stasenko; Irina Tunnage; Charles W Ashley; Maria M Rubinstein; Alicia J Latham; Arnaud Da Cruz Paula; Jennifer J Mueller; Mario M Leitao; Claire F Friedman; Vicky Makker; Robert A Soslow; Deborah F DeLair; David M Hyman; Dimitriy Zamarin; Kaled M Alektiar; Carol A Aghajanian; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Britta Weigelt; Karen A Cadoo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Urick; Daphne W Bell
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 10.  POLE, POLD1, and NTHL1: the last but not the least hereditary cancer-predisposing genes.

Authors:  Luigi Magrin; Daniele Fanale; Chiara Brando; Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan; Alessia Fiorino; Lidia Rita Corsini; Roberta Sciacchitano; Clarissa Filorizzo; Alessandra Dimino
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 9.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.