Literature DB >> 26763136

Significance of histologic tumor grade in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery: A multi-institutional retrospective study.

Jin Ho Song1, Sung Hwan Kim2, Jong Hoon Lee3, Hyeon Min Cho4, Dae Yong Kim5, Tae Hyun Kim5, Sun Young Kim5, Ji Yeon Baek5, Jae Hwan Oh5, Taek Keun Nam6, Mee Sun Yoon6, Jae Uk Jeong6, Kyubo Kim7, Eui Kyu Chie7, Hong Seok Jang8, Jae Sung Kim9, Jin Hee Kim10, Ki Mun Kang11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To evaluate the pre-treatment clinical factors affecting recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and curative surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The clinical data of 1782 patients from 8 institutions in Korea were analyzed. The potential prognostic factors that could be acquired before radical surgery were patient age, gender, clinical T and N stages, tumor size and location, tumor grade, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and the concurrent chemotherapy regimen. The relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of locoregional and distant recurrence were analyzed according to the clinical factors.
RESULTS: Among the pre-treatment clinical factors, tumor grade, pre-CRT CEA level, tumor location, and clinical N stage were significant prognostic factors affecting the RFS. The high-grade tumor was the hazardous factor for RFS on the multivariate analysis [Hazard ratio (HR), 1.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-2.58; p=0.001]. The 5-year RFS rate for high-grade tumors was significantly lower than that for low-grade tumors (63.8% vs. 78.8%, p<0.001). The tumor grade was a significant prognostic factor for distant recurrence (HR, 1.83, 95% CI, 1.29-2.58; p<0.001), but not for locoregional recurrence (HR, 1.49, 95% CI, 0.68-3.26; p=0.320) on the multivariate analysis. The 5-year OS rate for high-grade tumors was significantly lower than that for low-grade tumors (70.6% vs. 85.5%, p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: The tumor grade is the significant pre-treatment clinical factor for recurrence and survival in rectal cancer patients who receive preoperative CRT and curative surgery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grade; Histology; Neoplasm; Prognosis; Rectum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26763136     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  10 in total

1.  Prediction of Clinical Pathologic Prognostic Factors for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Volumetric Texture Analysis Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Maps.

Authors:  Zhihua Lu; Lei Wang; Kaijian Xia; Heng Jiang; Xiaoyan Weng; Jianlong Jiang; Mei Wu
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Prognostic Role of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jung Wook Huh; Seong Hyeon Yun; Seok Hyung Kim; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Hee Chul Park; Doo Ho Choi; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers.

Authors:  Rahul Bhamre; Abhishek Mitra; Anup Tamankar; Ashwin Desouza; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-02-09

4.  SIX1 is overexpressed in endometrial carcinoma and promotes the malignant behavior of cancer cells through ERK and AKT signaling.

Authors:  Xiaochuan Xin; Yue Li; Xianghong Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Relations of Changes in Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels before and after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and after Surgery to Histologic Response and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gota Saito; Sotaro Sadahiro; Takashi Ogimi; Hiroshi Miyakita; Kazutake Okada; Akira Tanaka; Toshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 6.  Pre-treatment carcinoembryonic antigen and outcome of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation and surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colloca; Antonella Venturino; Pasquale Vitucci
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Effect of leukocyte alteration on treatment outcomes following preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tae Gyu Kim; Won Park; Doo Ho Choi; Hee Chul Park; Seok-Hyung Kim; Yong Beom Cho; Seong Hyen Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Jeeyun Lee; Joon Oh Park; Young Suk Park
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 8.  Predictive and Prognostic Molecular Biomarkers for Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Delphine Dayde; Ichidai Tanaka; Rekha Jain; Mei Chee Tai; Ayumu Taguchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for stage II-III resectable rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin Ho Song; Jae Uk Jeong; Jong Hoon Lee; Sung Hwan Kim; Hyeon Min Cho; Jun Won Um; Hong Seok Jang
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2017-09-15

10.  Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Dakui Luo; Sanjun Cai; Qingguo Li; Xinxiang Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.