| Literature DB >> 26761292 |
Hyun-Joo Lee1, You-Jung Choi2, Yang-Il Choi3, Jae-Joon Lee2.
Abstract
This study was performed to investigate the effects of lemon balm (Melissa officinalis L.) on various quality and antioxidant activity of hamburger patties. Lemon balm extract (LBE) showed the highest amount of total polyphenol (801.00 mg TAE/g DW) and flavonoids (65.05 mg RA/g DW). The IC50 value of DPPH hydroxyl scavenging of LBE was 132 μg/mL. The hamburger patties were prepared by 0% (N), 0.1% (L1), 0.5% (L2), and 1.0% (L3) of the lemon balm powder. The addition of lemon balm powder increased the chewiness value, but did not affect the hardness, cohesiveness, and springiness values. Lemon balm powder had positive effects on sensory evaluation of patties. The pH of all patties decreased with longer storage period. 2-Thiobarbituric acid value, volatile basic nitrogen content, and the total microbial counts of hamburger patties in the L3 group were lower, compared to those of the normal (N group). In conclusion, the L3 group had significantly delayed lipid peroxidation compared to other treatment groups. However, the addition of lemon balm powder into patties showed no significantly influence on proximate composition, calorie contents, water holding capacity and cooking loss of patties. Therefore, lemon balm might be a useful natural antioxidant additive in meat products.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant effect; hamburger patty; lemon balm; quality; thiobarbituric acid value
Year: 2014 PMID: 26761292 PMCID: PMC4662158 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.4.533
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Formula of patties added with lemon balm powder (%)
| Ingredients | Treatment1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | |
| Beef | 70.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 70.0 |
| Pork | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Soybean oil | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Onion | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Garlic | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Bread powder | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Egg | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Salt | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Black pepper | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Total | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Ascorbic acid | - | 0.05 | - | - | - |
| Lemon balm powder | - | - | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.0 |
1)N (Normal: no lemon balm powder added), C (Control: ascorbic acid 0.05% added), L1 (lemon balm powder 0.1% added), L2 (lemon balm powder 0.5% added), L3 (lemon balm powder 1.0% added).
Contents of total polyphenol and total flavonoids in lemon balm ethanol extract
| Sample | Total polyphenol content (mg TAE/g DW) | Total flavonoids content (mg RE/g DW) |
|---|---|---|
| LBE | 801.00±9.241) | 65.05±2.43 |
1)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
Aantioxidative activities of lemon balm ethanol extract
| Sample1) | Antioxidative activity | |
|---|---|---|
| DPPH radical scavenging activity IC50 (μg/mL) | IP2) (Antioxidant index)3) | |
| LBE | 131.92±8.674)a5) | 13.22±0.41a (1.94) |
| BHA | 94.16±6.47b | 13.77±0.51a (2.00) |
| BHT | 99.05±4.87b | 13.47±0.51a (1.97) |
| Ascorbic acid | 42.34±2.16c | 15.32±0.25a (2.24) |
| Control | - | 6.83±0.50b (1.00) |
1)LBE: 80% ethanol extract from lemon balm, BHA: butylated hydroxyanisole, BHT: butylated hydroxytoluene, Control: soybean oil without lemon balm ethanol extract.
2)Induction period (IP) of oil was determined by test of Rancimat at 110℃.
3)Antioxidant index was expressed as IP of oil containing sample/IP of soybean oil.
4)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-cMeans with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Textural properties of patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder
| Items | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | |
| Hardness (g) | 2054.00±97.862) | 2724.00±265.62 | 2134.00±206.61 | 2276.00±57.84 | 2404.00±116.99 |
| Cohesiveness | 35.14±1.41 | 39.00±3.14 | 34.03±1.04 | 35.27±1.49 | 37.21±1.50 |
| Springiness | 53.84±3.98 | 56.05±3.02 | 54.51±0.49 | 55.83±2.21 | 54.10±2.01 |
| Chewiness (g) | 279.60±37.27b | 281.31±35.64b | 370.01±68.25ab | 397.21±49.49ab | 486.40±45.57a |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a,bMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Sensory evaluation of patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder
| Sensory characteristics2) | Treatments1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | |
| Color | 2.43±0.203)c | 4.54±0.31a | 3.09±0.28bc | 3.93±0.23ab | 4.54±0.24a |
| Springiness | 3.50±0.19 | 3.59±0.20 | 3.66±0.18 | 4.07±0.17 | 3.84±0.28 |
| Flavor | 3.57±0.20b | 3.59±0.17b | 4.03±0.25ab | 4.61±0.29a | 3.91±0.31ab |
| Juiciness | 3.61±0.26 | 3.63±0.27 | 3.87±0.15 | 4.11±0.28 | 3.93±0.25 |
| Total acceptability | 3.31±0.20b | 3.41±0.48b | 4.11±0.17ab | 4.72±0.27a | 3.71±0.38ab |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)1: dislike extremely, 3: neither like nor dislike, 5: like extremely.
3)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-cMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
pH changes of total aerobic counts for patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder during 15 d of storage at 5℃
| Storage time (d) | Treatments1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
| pH | 0 | 6.03±0.012)aA | 5.98±0.01bA | 5.91±0.01dA | 5.92±0.01dA | 5.95±0.01cA |
| 5 | 5.60±0.04aB | 5.31±0.03bB | 5.27±0.03bB | 5.23±0.02bcB | 5.13±0.03cB | |
| 10 | 4.74±0.01aC | 4.64±0.01bC | 4.62±0.01bcC | 4.63±0.01bcC | 4.60±0.01cC | |
| 15 | 4.67±0.01aC | 4.56±0.01bcC | 4.55±0.01cD | 4.58±0.01bD | 4.52±0.01dD | |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-dMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
A-DMeans in the same column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Changes of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) for patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder during 15 d of storage at 5℃
| Storage time (d) | Treatments1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
| TBA (mg MA/kg) | 0 | 0.29±0.012)aD | 0.18±0.01eD | 0.24±0.01cC | 0.26±0.01bD | 0.21±0.01dD |
| 5 | 0.40±0.01aC | 0.26±0.01cC | 0.34±0.01bB | 0.27±0.01cC | 0.26±0.02cC | |
| 10 | 0.46±0.01aB | 0.32±0.01cAB | 0.33±0.01cB | 0.39±0.01bB | 0.30±0.01cB | |
| 15 | 0.60±0.01aA | 0.35±0.01eA | 0.56±0.01bA | 0.47±0.01cA | 0.45±0.01dA | |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-dMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
A-DMeans in the same column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Changes of volatile basic nitrogen (VBN) for patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder during 15 d of storage at 5℃
| Storage time (d) | Treatments1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
| VBN (mg%) | 0 | 5.95±0.092)abD | 5.31±0.09bD | 6.59±0.27aC | 6.68±0.37aC | 6.59±0.16aD |
| 5 | 10.57±0.32abC | 9.47±0.16bC | 13.59±1.35aB | 10.84±1.35abB | 9.38±0.51bC | |
| 10 | 15.33±0.64aB | 11.67±0.27bB | 14.87±0.66aAB | 13.59±0.42aB | 11.39±0.16bB | |
| 15 | 17.80±0.24aA | 15.05±0.48bA | 17.62±0.09aA | 17.25±0.33aA | 15.76±0.27bA | |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-dMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
A-DMeans in the same column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
Changes of total aerobic counts (TPC) for patties prepared with different levels of lemon balm powder during 15 d of storage at 5℃
| Storage time (d) | Treatments1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | C | L1 | L2 | L3 | ||
| Log CFU/g | 0 | 3.93±0.092)D | 4.01±0.01D | 3.94±0.08D | 3.92±0.01D | 4.03±0.02D |
| 5 | 5.39±0.01aC | 4.95±0.02cC | 5.34±0.01aC | 5.02±0.02bC | 5.05±0.02bC | |
| 10 | 6.53±0.06aB | 5.90±0.01cB | 6.29±0.11abB | 6.16±0.07bcB | 5.93±0.05cB | |
| 15 | 7.69±0.21aA | 6.40±0.12bA | 7.40±0.01aA | 7.18±0.01aA | 6.48±0.01bA | |
1)See the legend of Table 1.
2)All values are expressed as mean±SE of triplicate determinations.
a-dMeans in the same row not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.
A-DMeans in the same column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (p<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple range test.