| Literature DB >> 26761178 |
Dae-Yeon Cho1, Kyungae Jo2, So Young Cho2, Jin Man Kim3, Kwangsei Lim4, Hyung Joo Suh5, Sejong Oh6.
Abstract
This study utilized commercially available proteolytic enzymes to prepare egg-white protein hydrolysates (EPHs) with different degrees of hydrolysis. The antioxidant effect and functionalities of the resultant products were then investigated. Treatment with Neutrase yielded the most α-amino groups (6.52 mg/mL). Alcalase, Flavourzyme, Protamex, and Ficin showed similar degrees of α-amino group liberation (3.19-3.62 mg/mL). Neutrase treatment also resulted in the highest degree of hydrolysis (23.4%). Alcalase and Ficin treatment resulted in similar degrees of hydrolysis. All hydrolysates, except for the Flavourzyme hydrolysate, had greater radical scavenging activity than the control. The Neutrase hydrolysate showed the highest 2,2-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical scavenging activity (IC50=3.6mg/mL). Therefore, Neutrase was identified as the optimal enzyme for hydrolyzing egg-white protein to yield antioxidant peptides. During Neutrase hydrolysis, the reaction rate was rapid over the first 4 h, and then subsequently declined. The IC50 value was lowest after the first hour (2.99 mg/mL). The emulsifying activity index (EAI) of EPH treated with Neutrase decreased, as the pH decreased. The EPH foaming capacity was maximal at pH 3.6, and decreased at an alkaline pH. Digestion resulted in significantly higher 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and ABTS radical scavenging activity. The active peptides released from egg-white protein showed antioxidative activities on ABTS and DHHP radical. Thus, this approach may be useful for the preparation of potent antioxidant products.Entities:
Keywords: Neutrase; egg-white protein; functionality; hydrolysate; radical scavenging activity
Year: 2014 PMID: 26761178 PMCID: PMC4597870 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.3.362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Enzyme characteristics
| Enzyme | Source | Optimum condition | Type | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature(℃) | pH | |||
| Alcalase | 50-60 | 8.0-9.0 | Endo | |
| Neutrase | 45 | 6.0-7.0 | Endo | |
| Protamex | 35-60 | 5.5-7.5 | Complex | |
| Flavourzyme | 45-50 | 5.0-7.0 | Complex | |
| Collupulin | 50-70 | 5.0-7.5 | Endo | |
| Ficin | 45-55 | 5.0-6.0 | Endo | |
Fig. 1.α-amino nitrogen content of egg white hydrolysates made with various proteases. These values are means± S.D. Different letters indicate significant differences among the control and six protease treatments (p<0.05).
Fig. 2.DH of EPH made with various proteases. These values are means±S.D. Different letters indicate significant differences with the same protease (p<0.05).
Fig. 3.Radical scavenging activities of EPH made with various proteases. These values are means±S.D. Different letters indicate significant differences with the same protease (p<0.05).
Fig. 4.Changes in A-N content and DH of EPH during Neutrase hydrolysis. These values are means±S.D. Different letters indicate significant differences with the same protease (p<0.05).
Fig. 5.Solubility (A), emulsifying activity index (B), foaming capacity (C), and stability (D) of Neutrase hydrolysate in different pHs. The hydrolysate was dissolved in 50 mM citrate-NaOH buffer (pH 3.6), phosphate buffer (pH 7.6), and Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.0). Then, the solubility, EAI, FS, and FC were determined. These values are means±S.D. a-cDifferent letters indicate significant differences with the same sample (p<0.05). *The differences between samples before and after enzyme hydrolysis were evaluated by Student’s t-tests (p<0.05).
Fig. 6.Effect of neutrase digestion on DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities. These values are means±S.D. *The differences between samples before and after digestion were evaluated by Student’s t-tests (p<0.05).