Literature DB >> 26760848

Thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes have a low risk of malignancy.

Dong Gyu Na1, Ji-Hoon Kim2, Dea Sik Kim1,3, Soo Jin Kim1,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to determine the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes.
METHODS: A total of consecutive 1,000 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) with final diagnoses from twoinstitutions were included in this study. The risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules was analyzed according to the internal content, which was categorized as purely solid, minimally cystic (cystic changes ≤10%), and partially cystic (cystic changes >10%). We also assessed the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes depending on echogenicity and presence of any suspicious ultrasonografic (US) features.
RESULTS: The overall frequency of purely solid, minimally cystic, and partially cystic noduleswas 730/1,000 (73%), 61/1,000 (6.1%), and 209/1,000 (20.9%), respectively, with risks ofmalignancy of 14.8% (108/730), 3.3% (2/61), and 3.3% (7/209), respectively. The risk ofmalignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was significantly lower than that of purelysolid nodules (P=0.013). The risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was also lower than that of purely solid nodules in the group of hypoechoic nodules (P=0.063) and in the group of nodules with suspicious US features (P=0.028), but was not significantly different from that of partially cystic nodules regardless of echogenicity or the presence of suspicious US features (P≥0.652).
CONCLUSION: Thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes have a low risk of malignancy, similar to that of partially cystic nodules regardless of echogenicity or the presence of suspicious US features. The US lexicon could define solid nodules as nodules with purely solid internal content in order to enhance the accuracy of estimated risks of malignancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Neoplasm; Thyroid nodule; Ultrasonography

Year:  2015        PMID: 26760848      PMCID: PMC4825208          DOI: 10.14366/usg.15070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonography        ISSN: 2288-5919


Introduction

Ultrasonography (US) is the primary tool used to estimate the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules. Moreover, US plays an essential role in decisions regarding fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and a complementary role in decisions regarding medical management after FNA is performed in thyroid nodules [1-5]. Recent meta-analyses [6-8] have consistently demonstrated that the gray-scale US features of microcalcification, microlobulated/spiculated (irregular) margins, and a nonparallel orientation (taller-than-wide shape) are strongly predictive of malignancy with a very high specificity, while the US features of solid internal content and hypoechogenicity are also independently predictive of malignancy with an intermediate specificity for thyroid malignancy. The definition of solid internal content has not been standardized, and the lexicon of solid internal content is defined as purely solid internal content [9,10], nodules composed entirely or nearly entirely of soft tissue with only a few tiny cystic spaces [11], and nodules with a cystic portion comprising less than 10% of their volume [12,13]. Considering the role of the US lexicon in estimating the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules, the US lexicon should include definitions that optimize the predictability of malignancy or benignity. However, to the best of our knowledge, the prevalence and risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes have not been investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes.

Materials and Methods

The Institutional Review Board (Human Medical Imaging and Intervention Center, Seoul National University Hospital) approved this retrospective study, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived.

Patients

A total of consecutive 1,000 thyroid nodules from 842 patients (635 women, 207 men; mean age, 52±11.7 years) were included in this study. A total of 1,000 nodules with final diagnoses were selected from 1,943 thyroid nodules (≥1 cm) of patients who underwent FNA or core needle biopsy (CNB) between January 2010 and May 2011 at two institutions. We excluded 943 nodules because the final diagnosis was not obtained in 937 nodules and the US characteristics could not be analyzed in six isolated macrocalcifications (entirely calcified nodules). The final diagnosis of malignant tumors was made surgically. The final diagnosis of benign nodules was determined by (1) the pathological results of surgical resection, (2) benign cytology results from FNA or CNB that had been repeated at least twice, or (3) an initial benign result from FNA or CNB and a decreased or stable nodule size at a US follow-up performed more than 12 months after the original procedure.

US Examinations and Image Analysis

High-resolution US scanning using a 10-12 MHz or 5-14 MHz linear-array transducer (AplioXG, Toshiba, Otawarashi, Japan; iU22, Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA, USA) was employed. The sonograms were retrospectively reviewed at two sessions with an interval of six months by one experienced thyroid radiologist (D.G.N., who had 19 years of experience in performing thyroid US and interventional procedures, respectively, at the time of the analysis). The reviewer, who had no previous knowledge of the FNA results or the final diagnoses, assessed the US features of internal content, echogenicity, and suspicious US features including microcalcification, nonparallel orientation, and spiculated/microlobulated margins [12]. At the first review session, the internal content of each thyroid nodule was categorized as solid (cystic portion ≤10%) and partially cystic (cystic portion >10%). At the second review session, the solid nodules (cystic portion ≤10%) identified in the previous review session were reclassified into purely solid nodules and nodules with minimal cystic changes in a blind fashion (Figs. 1, 2). Nodules were classified as having minimal cystic changes when an anechoic cystic portion was clearly found within a nodule. Echogenicity was categorized as hypoechogenicity (marked or mild hypoechogenicity) and isohyperechogenicity (isoechogenicity or hyperechogenicity) according to the predominant pattern of echogenicity in comparison to the normal thyroid gland and anterior neck muscle.
Fig. 1.

An isoechoic nodule with minimal cystic changes in a 47-year-old woman.

The isoechoic nodule (40 mm) has a smooth margin, ovoid shape, parallel orientation, and focal minimal cystic change (arrow). The final diagnosis was benign follicular nodule.

Fig. 2.

A hypoechoic nodule with minimal cystic changes in a 50-year-old woman.

The mildly hypoechoic nodule (30 mm) has a smooth margin, ovoid shape, parallel orientation, and focal minimal cystic change (arrow). The final diagnosis was benign follicular nodule.

US-Guided FNA and CNB Procedures

US-guided FNA was routinely performed for thyroid nodules greater than 1 cm, with the exception of pure cystic nodules, partially cystic nodules with comet-tail artifacts, and spongiform nodules [12]. FNA was performed using the conventional method and at least two samples were obtained from each nodule [14]. CNB was performed using a disposable 18-gauge single or double-action spring-activated needle (approximately 1 or 2 cm excursion; TSK Acecut or Stericut, Create Medic, Yokohama, Japan), as described elsewhere [15]. The interpretation of FNA was based on the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology [1] and the interpretation of CNB was based on a CNB pathology reporting system [16].

Data Analysis and Statistics

We assessed the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes in the thyroid nodules overall and according to echogenicity and the presence of any suspicious US features (microcalcification, nonparallel orientation, and spiculated/microlobulated margins). The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to identify associations between the US features of internal content and malignancy, as well as to compare the risk of malignancy of nodules according to the internal content of each group as categorized by echogenicity and the presence of any suspicious US features. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 19.0 for Windows (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA), and P-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Demographic Data

The maximal size of nodules ranged from 10 to 87 mm (mean size, 18.3±9.5 mm). The final diagnoses of the 1,000 nodules included in this study were 883 benign nodules (88.3%) (859 benign non-neoplastic nodules, 24 benign tumors) and 117 malignant nodules (11.7%). Final diagnoses were determined by surgical resection in 123 of 883 benign nodules (13.8%), including 89 nodular hyperplasias, 21 follicular adenomas, 10 cases of thyroiditis, two hyalinizing trabecular tumors, and one schwannoma. The final diagnosis of malignant tumors was made by surgical resection in all cases, including 105 papillary carcinomas, 11 follicular carcinomas, and one medullar carcinoma.

Overall Risk of Malignancy of Nodules with Minimal Cystic Changes

Table 1 presents the frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to their internal content. The frequency of purely solid, minimally cystic, and partially cystic nodules was 730 (73%), 61 (6.1%), and 209 (20.9%), respectively, with risks of malignancy of 14.8% (108/730), 3.3% (2/61), and 3.3% (7/209), respectively.
Table 1.

The frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to internal content

Internal contentOverall (n=1,000)Benign nodule (n=883)Malignant nodule (n=117)Malignancy risk (%)P-valuea)
 Purely solid730 (73)622 (70.4)108 (92.3)14.8<0.001
 Minimally cystic61 (6.1)59 (6.7)2 (1.7)3.30.035
 Partially cystic209 (20.9)202 (22.9)7 (6.0)3.3<0.001

Values are presented as number (%).

The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate associations between each category of internal content and the final diagnosis.

Thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes were found in 6.1% of all nodules, and the frequency of minimal cystic changes was significantly higher in benign nodules than in malignant nodules (6.7% vs. 1.7%, P=0.035). The risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was 3.3%, which was the same as the risk of malignancy of partially cystic nodules and significantly lower than the risk of malignancy (14.8%) of solid nodules (P=0.013).

Risk of Malignancy of Nodules with Minimal Cystic Changes According to Echogenicity

Table 2 presents the frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to the echogenicity of the nodule. Nodules with minimal cystic changes were found in nine of the 257 hypoechoic nodules (3.5%) and in 52 of the 743 isohyperechoic nodules (7%). The frequency of minimal cystic changes was slightly higher in benign nodules in both hypoechoic and isohyperechoic nodules, but this trend was statistically nonsignificant (P=0.118 and P=0.568, respectively). In hypoechoic nodules, a malignant tumor was not found in nine nodules with minimal cystic changes, and the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was marginally lower than that of purely solid nodules (0% vs. 29.7%, P=0.063). In isohyperechoic nodules, the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was similar to that of partially cystic nodules (3.8% vs. 2.7%, P=0.652), and it was lower than the risk of malignancy of purely solid nodules (8.3%), but to a statistically nonsignificant extent (P=0.414).
Table 2.

The frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to internal content and echogenicity

Nodule echogenicityOverall (n=1,000)Benign nodule (n=883)Malignant nodule (n=117)Malignancy risk (%)P-valuea)
 Hypoechogenicity257 (25.7)189 (21.4)68 (58.1)26.5<0.001
  Purely solid222 (86.4)156 (82.5)66 (97.1)29.70.003
  Minimally cystic9 (3.5)9 (4.8)00.00.118
  Partially cystic26 (10.1)24 (12.7)2 (2.9)7.70.022
 Isohyperechogenicity743 (74.3)694 (78.6)49 (41.9)6.6<0.001
  Purely solid508 (68.4)466 (67.1)42 (85.7)8.30.007
  Minimally cystic52 (7)50 (7.2)2 (4.1)3.80.568
  Partially cystic183 (24.6)178 (25.7)5 (10.2)2.70.015

Values are presented as number (%).

The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate associations between each category of internal content, echogenicity, and the final diagnosis.

Risk of Malignancy of Nodules with Minimal Cystic Change According to Suspicious US Features

Table 3 presents the frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to the presence of suspicious US features. Nodules with minimal cystic changes comprised six of the 144 nodules (4.2%) with at least one suspicious US feature and 55 of the 856 nodules (6.4%) without suspicious US features. The frequency of minimal cystic changes was higher in the benign nodules in both the group of nodules with suspicious US features and the group without suspicious US features (P=0.087 and P=0.011, respectively). In nodules with suspicious US features, malignant tumors were not found in the six nodules with minimal cystic changes, and the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was significantly lower than that of purely solid nodules (0% vs. 50.5%, P=0.028). In the nodules without suspicious US features, the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was similar to that of partially cystic nodules (3.6% vs. 2.9%, P=0.68), and lower than the risk of malignancy of purely solid nodules (9.2%), but to a statistically nonsignificant extent (P=0.215).
Table 3.

The frequency and risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules according to internal content and the presence of suspicious ultrasound (US) features

US featureOverall (n=1,000)Benign nodule (n=883)Malignant nodule (n=117)Malignancy risk (%)P-valueb)
Suspicious US features (+)144 (14.4)92 (10.4)52 (44.4)36.1<0.001
 Purely solid99 (68.6)49 (53.3)50 (96.2)50.5<0.001
 Minimally cystic6 (4.2)6 (6.5)00.00.087
 Partially cystic39 (27.1)37 (40.2)2 (3.8)5.1<0.001
Suspicious US features (-)856 (85.6)791 (89.6)65 (55.6)7.60.003
 Purely solid631 (73.7)573 (72.4)58 (89.2)9.20.425
 Minimally cystic55 (6.4)53 (6.7)2 (3.1)3.60.011
 Partially cystic170 (19.9)165 (20.9)5 (7.7)2.9<0.001

Values are presented as number (%).

Spiculated/microlobulated margins, nonparallel orientation (taller-than-wide shape), and microcalcification.

The chi-square test or Fisher exact test was used to evaluate associations between each category of internal content, the presence of suspicious US features, and the final diagnosis.

Discussion

Our data demonstrated that thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes had a low prevalence (6.1%) and a low risk of malignancy (3.3%). The risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes was similar to that of partially cystic nodules, and exhibited a tendency to be lower than the risk of malignancy of purely solid nodules regardless of nodule echogenicity or the presence of suspicious US features. The US lexicon for thyroid nodules should be clinically useful for risk stratification of malignancy because one of the essential clinical roles of US imaging is to estimate the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules in order to support decision-making in the management of patients with thyroid nodules. Recently, the US-based risk stratification system has been used for the management of thyroid nodules in clinical practice, and most risk stratification systems categorize thyroid nodules according to the risk of malignancy based on combined US patterns including solidity, echogenicity, and various US features [17-21]. The US feature of solid internal content is an independent US predictor for malignancy and has been used for the risk stratification of thyroid nodules. However, it has not been determined whether the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes is similar to that of purely solid nodules or partially cystic nodules. If the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes is similar to that of purely solid nodules, the US lexicon definition of solid internal content should include minimal cystic changes; however, if it is similar to the risk of malignancy of partially cystic nodules, solid internal content should be defined as purely solid content. Accurately determining the presence of minimal cystic changes can be difficult in some nodules because the cystic content may not manifest as a typically anechoic lesion depending on the characteristics of the cyst content, and markedly hypoechoic solid components such as fibrosis may show cyst-like hypoechogenicity [22]. Minimal cystic changes were more commonly found in isohyperechoic nodules, which may be associated with higher tendency for cystic changes in benign nodules and a tendency for minimal cystic changes to be more clearly identified by higher contrast in isohyperechoic nodules than in with hypoechoic nodules. We analyzed the risk of malignancy of nodules with minimal cystic changes depending on nodule echogenicity and the presence of suspicious US features because those parameters are strongly associated with the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules [23]. Our data demonstrated that thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes had a low risk of malignancy, similar to the risk of malignancy of partially cystic nodules. This result suggests that thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes should be categorized as partially cystic nodules and that the US lexicon definition of solid nodules could be defined as referring to nodules with purely solid internal content. This categorization for internal content may prove helpful in increasing the accuracy of US findings for predicting the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules. In our study, hypoechogenicity and suspicious US features showed a tendency to increase the risk of malignancy of purely solid or partially cystic nodules. However, no malignant tumor was found in a minimally cystic nodule with hypoechogenicity or suspicious US features. The most likely explanation for this is the low frequency of minimally cystic nodules with hypoechogenicity or suspicious US features, which comprise less than 1% of overall nodules. Therefore, although the risk of malignancy of minimally cystic nodules with hypoechogenicity or suspicious US features was lower than that of purely solid nodules, the accurate risk of malignancy of these nodules may not have been determined by the present study due to the small number of nodules that were studied. This study has several limitations. First, the retrospective assessment of static sonograms places an inevitable limitation on the accuracy of the US interpretation of minimal cystic changes. Second, the sonograms were analyzed by one interpreter, meaning that interobserver reliability was not assessed. Third, the accurate risk of malignancy of minimally cystic thyroid nodules with hypoechogenicity or suspicious US features should be determined by a subsequent study incorporating a larger sample. In conclusion, thyroid nodules with minimal cystic changes have a low risk of malignancy (3.3%), which is similar to the risk of malignancy of partially cystic nodules, regardless of echogenicity or the presence of suspicious US features. In the US lexicon, solid nodules could be defined as nodules with purely solid internal content in order to enhance the accuracy of US in predicting the risk of malignancy of thyroid nodules.
  22 in total

1.  Thyroid nodules with atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (Bethesda Category III): importance of ultrasonography and cytological subcategory.

Authors:  Pedro Weslley Rosario
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 6.568

2.  The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.

Authors:  Edmund S Cibas; Syed Z Ali
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.568

3.  Standardized Ultrasound Report for Thyroid Nodules: The Endocrinologist's Viewpoint.

Authors:  Massimiliano Andrioli; Chiara Carzaniga; Luca Persani
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2013-02-23

4.  Combined categorical reporting systems of US and cytology findings for thyroid nodules: guidance on repeat fine-needle aspiration cytology.

Authors:  Sang-Woo Lee; Hui Joong Lee; Hye Jung Kim; Jongmin Lee; Ji-Young Park; Seong Hun Kim; Junghun Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Characterization of the major histopathological components of thyroid nodules using sonographic textural features for clinical diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Shao-Jer Chen; Sung-Nien Yu; Jeh-En Tzeng; Yen-Ting Chen; Ku-Yaw Chang; Kuo-Sheng Cheng; Fu-Tsung Hsiao; Chang-Kuo Wei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 6.  Quantification of cancer risk of each clinical and ultrasonographic suspicious feature of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Campanella; Francesca Ianni; Carlo Antonio Rota; Salvatore Maria Corsello; Alfredo Pontecorvi
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 7.  The accuracy of thyroid nodule ultrasound to predict thyroid cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juan P Brito; Michael R Gionfriddo; Alaa Al Nofal; Kasey R Boehmer; Aaron L Leppin; Carl Reading; Matthew Callstrom; Tarig A Elraiyah; Larry J Prokop; Marius N Stan; M Hassan Murad; John C Morris; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 8.  Ultrasonography and the ultrasound-based management of thyroid nodules: consensus statement and recommendations.

Authors:  Won-Jin Moon; Jung Hwan Baek; So Lyung Jung; Dong Wook Kim; Eun Kyung Kim; Ji Young Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Jeong Hyun Lee; Joon Hyung Lee; Young Hen Lee; Dong Gyu Na; Jeong Seon Park; Sun Won Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 9.  Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Luciana Reck Remonti; Caroline Kaercher Kramer; Cristiane Bauermann Leitão; Lana Catani F Pinto; Jorge Luiz Gross
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 6.568

Review 10.  Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: a consensus statement by the korean society of thyroid radiology.

Authors:  Young Hen Lee; Jung Hwan Baek; So Lyung Jung; Jin Young Kwak; Ji-hoon Kim; Jung Hee Shin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  14 in total

1.  European Thyroid Association Guidelines for Ultrasound Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules in Adults: The EU-TIRADS.

Authors:  Gilles Russ; Steen J Bonnema; Murat Faik Erdogan; Cosimo Durante; Rose Ngu; Laurence Leenhardt
Journal:  Eur Thyroid J       Date:  2017-08-08

2.  Impact of the ultrasonography assessment method on the malignancy risk and diagnostic performance of five risk stratification systems in thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Go Eun Yang; Dong Gyu Na
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  A Multicenter Prospective Validation Study for the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Patients with Thyroid Nodules.

Authors:  Eun Ju Ha; Won-Jin Moon; Dong Gyu Na; Young Hen Lee; Nami Choi; Soo Jin Kim; Jae Kyun Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 4.  Ultrasonographic imaging of papillary thyroid carcinoma variants.

Authors:  Jung Hee Shin
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2017-01-12

5.  Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma With Cystic Changes in a Patient With Prior History of Toxic Nodule.

Authors:  Gliceida Maria Galarza Fortuna; Paola Rios; Ailyn Rivero; Gabriela Zuniga; Kathrin Dvir; Michael M Pagacz; Alex Manzano
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

6.  Diagnostic efficacy of multiple MRI parameters in differentiating benign vs. malignant thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Ran Wei; Weiyan Liu; Yongqi Chen; Bin Song
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 1.930

Review 7.  Ultrasonography Diagnosis and Imaging-Based Management of Thyroid Nodules: Revised Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Consensus Statement and Recommendations.

Authors:  Jung Hee Shin; Jung Hwan Baek; Jin Chung; Eun Joo Ha; Ji-Hoon Kim; Young Hen Lee; Hyun Kyung Lim; Won-Jin Moon; Dong Gyu Na; Jeong Seon Park; Yoon Jung Choi; Soo Yeon Hahn; Se Jeong Jeon; So Lyung Jung; Dong Wook Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Chang Yoon Lee; Hui Joong Lee; Jeong Hyun Lee; Joon Hyung Lee; Kwang Hui Lee; Sun-Won Park; Jin Young Sung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  TIRADS Management Guidelines in the Investigation of Thyroid Nodules; Illustrating the Concerns, Costs, and Performance.

Authors:  Tom James Cawood; Georgia Rose Mackay; Penny Jane Hunt; Donal O'Shea; Stephen Skehan; Yi Ma
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2020-03-10

9.  Different sonographic features of peripheral thyroid nodule calcification and risk of malignancy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Mehrdad Nabahati; Naser Ghaemian; Zoleika Moazezi; Rahele Mehraeen
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Partially cystic thyroid cancer on conventional and elastographic ultrasound: a retrospective study and a machine learning-assisted system.

Authors:  Hai-Na Zhao; Jing-Yan Liu; Qi-Zhong Lin; Yu-Shuang He; Hong-Hao Luo; Yu-Lan Peng; Bu-Yun Ma
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.