Literature DB >> 26760725

Improvement in Detection of Differential Item Functioning Using a Mixture Item Response Theory Model.

Annette M Maij-de Meij1, Henk Kelderman1, Henk van der Flier1.   

Abstract

Usually, methods for detection of differential item functioning (DIF) compare the functioning of items across manifest groups. However, the manifest groups with respect to which the items function differentially may not necessarily coincide with the true source of the bias. It is expected that DIF detection under a model that includes a latent DIF variable is more sensitive to this source of bias. In a simulation study, it is shown that a mixture item response theory model, which includes a latent grouping variable, performs better in identifying DIF items than DIF detection methods using manifest variables only. The difference between manifest and latent DIF detection increases as the correlation between the manifest variable and the true source of the DIF becomes smaller. Different sample sizes, relative group sizes, and significance levels are studied. Finally, an empirical example demonstrates the detection of heterogeneity in a minority sample using a latent grouping variable. Manifest and latent DIF detection methods are applied to a Vocabulary test of the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB).

Year:  2010        PMID: 26760725     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2010.533047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  9 in total

1.  Latent variable mixture models: a promising approach for the validation of patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Pamela A Ratner; Jacek A Kopec; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  A Note on Parameter Estimate Comparability: Across Latent Classes in Mixture IRT Modeling.

Authors:  Insu Paek; Sun-Joo Cho
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-09-15

3.  Rasch Mixture Models for DIF Detection: A Comparison of Old and New Score Specifications.

Authors:  Hannah Frick; Carolin Strobl; Achim Zeileis
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Robustness of Latent Profile Analysis to Measurement Noninvariance Between Profiles.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Eunsook Kim; Zhiyao Yi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  DIF Detection With Zero-Inflation Under the Factor Mixture Modeling Framework.

Authors:  Sooyong Lee; Suhwa Han; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.088

6.  Accuracy of mixture item response theory models for identifying sample heterogeneity in patient-reported outcomes: a simulation study.

Authors:  Tolulope T Sajobi; Lisa M Lix; Lara Russell; David Schulz; Juxin Liu; Bruno D Zumbo; Richard Sawatzky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 3.440

7.  Testing Measurement Invariance Across Unobserved Groups: The Role of Covariates in Factor Mixture Modeling.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Eunsook Kim; John M Ferron; Robert F Dedrick; Tony X Tan; Stephen Stark
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  Latent variable mixture models to test for differential item functioning: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Xiuyun Wu; Richard Sawatzky; Wilma Hopman; Nancy Mayo; Tolulope T Sajobi; Juxin Liu; Jerilynn Prior; Alexandra Papaioannou; Robert G Josse; Tanveer Towheed; K Shawn Davison; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction.

Authors:  Richard Sawatzky; Lara B Russell; Tolulope T Sajobi; Lisa M Lix; Jacek Kopec; Bruno D Zumbo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.