Osama Elbuluk1, Naira Muradyan, Joanna Shih, Marcelino Bernardo, Sandeep Sankineni, Maria J Merino, Bradford J Wood, Peter A Pinto, Peter L Choyke, Baris Turkbey. 1. From the *Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; †iCAD, Inc, Nashua, NH; ‡Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; §Imaging Physics, SAIC Frederick, Inc, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD; and ∥Laboratory of Pathology, ¶Center for Interventional Oncology, and #Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of quantitative diffusion and perfusion parameters to aid in discriminating between transition zone carcinomas and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four transition zone cancers and BPH nodules were contoured on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and raw dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Benign prostatic hyperplasia nodules were then stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of a capsule. Apparent diffusion coefficient values, per-voxel Ktrans, kep, vp, and ve were all compared across all groups. RESULTS: Average ADCs (×10 mm/s) were 1019.22, 1338.11, and 1272.46 for cancer, encapsulated BPH, and nonencapsulated BPH, respectively. Both subgroups of BPH were found to be significantly different than that of cancer (P < 0.05). No individual DCE-MRI parameter was significantly different between cancer and either BPH group. The area under the curve for ADC alone was 0.83, and no individual DCE imaging parameter improved the area under the curve of ADC. CONCLUSIONS: Apparent diffusion coefficient may play a role in distinguishing TZ cancers from non-encapsulated BPH nodules that closely resemble cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of quantitative diffusion and perfusion parameters to aid in discriminating between transition zone carcinomas and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four transition zone cancers and BPH nodules were contoured on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and raw dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI. Benign prostatic hyperplasia nodules were then stratified into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of a capsule. Apparent diffusion coefficient values, per-voxel Ktrans, kep, vp, and ve were all compared across all groups. RESULTS: Average ADCs (×10 mm/s) were 1019.22, 1338.11, and 1272.46 for cancer, encapsulated BPH, and nonencapsulated BPH, respectively. Both subgroups of BPH were found to be significantly different than that of cancer (P < 0.05). No individual DCE-MRI parameter was significantly different between cancer and either BPH group. The area under the curve for ADC alone was 0.83, and no individual DCE imaging parameter improved the area under the curve of ADC. CONCLUSIONS: Apparent diffusion coefficient may play a role in distinguishing TZ cancers from non-encapsulated BPH nodules that closely resemble cancer.
Authors: A R Padhani; C J Gapinski; D A Macvicar; G J Parker; J Suckling; P B Revell; M O Leach; D P Dearnaley; J E Husband Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Vijay Shah; Thomas Pohida; Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; Peter Choyke; Marcelino Bernardo Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Caroline M A Hoeks; Thomas Hambrock; Derya Yakar; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Ton Feuth; J Alfred Witjes; Jurgen J Fütterer; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-11-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jurgen J Fütterer; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Tom W J Scheenen; Jeroen Veltman; Henkjan J Huisman; Pieter Vos; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; J Alfred Witjes; Paul F M Krabbe; Arend Heerschap; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-09-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Marc R Engelbrecht; Henkjan J Huisman; Robert J F Laheij; Gerrit J Jager; Geert J L H van Leenders; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van De Kaa; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Johan G Blickman; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-08-27 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tan B Nguyen; Alexander Ushinsky; Albert Yang; Michael Nguyentat; Sara Fardin; Edward Uchio; Chandana Lall; Thomas Lee; Roozbeh Houshyar Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: M Veronica Clavijo Jordan; Su-Tang Lo; Shiuhwei Chen; Christian Preihs; Sara Chirayil; Shanrong Zhang; Payal Kapur; Wen-Hong Li; Luis M De Leon-Rodriguez; Angelo J M Lubag; Neil M Rofsky; A Dean Sherry Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 11.205