| Literature DB >> 26759546 |
Małgorzata Sokołowska-Wojdyło1, Karolina Olek-Hrab2, Katarzyna Ruckemann-Dziurdzińska3.
Abstract
Primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) are a heterogeneous group of lymphoproliferative neoplasms, with lymphatic proliferation limited to the skin with no involvement of lymph nodes, bone marrow or viscera at the diagnosis. Cutaneous lymphomas originate from mature T-lymphocytes (65% of all cases), mature B-lymphocytes (25%) or NK cells. Histopathological evaluation including immunophenotyping of the skin biopsy specimen is the basis of the diagnosis, which must be complemented with a precise staging of the disease and identification of prognostic factors, to allow for the choice of the best treatment method as well as for the evaluation of the treatment results.Entities:
Keywords: Sézary syndrome; mycosis fungoides; primary cutaneous lymphoma
Year: 2015 PMID: 26759546 PMCID: PMC4692822 DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2015.54749
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Postepy Dermatol Alergol ISSN: 1642-395X Impact factor: 1.837
2008 WHO classification of mature T, NK and B-cell primary cutaneous lymphomas
| Subtype | Frequency (%) | 5-year survival rate (%) |
|---|---|---|
| CTCL – indolent clinical behaviour: | ||
| Mycosis fungoides (MF): | 44 | 88 |
| Folliculotropic MF | 4 | 80 |
| Pagetoid reticulosis | < 1 | 100 |
| Granulomatous slack skin | < 1 | 100 |
|
| 12 | 100 |
| Primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (C-ALCL) | 8 | 95 |
| Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) | 1 | 82 |
| Primary cutaneous small/medium pleomorphic T-cell lymphoma | 2 | 72 |
| CTCL – aggressive clinical behaviour: | ||
| Sézary syndrome (SS) | 3 | 24 |
| Primary cutaneous peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified | 2 | 16 |
| Primary cutaneous aggressive epidermotropic CD8 T-cell lymphoma (AECTCL) | < 1 | 18 |
| Primary cutaneous γ/δ T-cell lymphoma (PCGD-TCL) | < 1 | – |
| Primary cutaneous (extra-nodal) NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type | < 1 | – |
| CBCL: | ||
| Primary cutaneous follicle centre lymphoma (PCFCL) | 11 | 95 |
| Primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphoma (PCMZL) | 7 | 99 |
| Primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, | 4 | 55 |
CBCL – Cutaneous B-cell lymphoma, CTCL – cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.
Figure 1Pathogenesis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
Figure 2The skin microenvironment in MF progression. A – Normal skin, B – patch and plaque MF, C – tumour MF, D – erythrodermic MF and SS [3]
Classification of the skin lesions, nodal, extranodal and peripheral blood involvement in Mycosis Fungoides and the Sézary Syndrome according to the staging proposed in 2007 by the International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas (ISCL) and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and 2010 Tumour-Nodes-Metastasis-Blood (TNMB) classification
| Skin lesions | ||
|---|---|---|
| T1 | Limited patches*, papules and/or plaques** covering < 10% of the skin surface | |
| T1a | Patch only (< 10% of the skin surface) | |
| T1b | Plaque and patch (< 10% of the skin surface) | |
| T2 | Patches, papules or plaques covering ≥ 10% of the skin surface | |
| T2a | Patch only (≥ 10% of the skin surface) | |
| T2b | Plaque and patch (≥ 10% of the skin surface) | |
| T3 | ≥ 1 tumour*** (≥ 1 cm diameter) | |
| T4 | Confluence of erythema covering ≥ 80% of body surface area | |
| *For skin, patch indicates any size skin lesion without any significant elevation or induration. Presence/absence of hypo- or hyperpigmentation, scale, crusting, and/or poikiloderma should be noted. **For skin, plaque indicates any size skin lesion that is elevated or indurated. Presence or absence of the same features as for patches should be noted. Histologic features such as folliculotropism or large-cell transformation (> 25% large cells), CD30+ or CD30–, and clinical features, such as ulceration, are important to document. ***For skin, tumour indicates at least 1 cm diameter solid or nodular lesion with evidence of depth and/or vertical growth. Note the total number of lesions, total volume of lesions, largest size lesion, and the region of body involved. Also, note if histologic evidence of large cell transformation has occurred. Phenotyping for CD30 is encouraged. | ||
| N0 | No clinically abnormal peripheral lymph nodes (i.e. cervical, supraclavicular, epitrochlear, axillary, and inguinal); biopsy not required | |
| N1 | Clinically abnormal* peripheral lymph nodes; histopathology Dutch grade 1 or NCI LN 0–2 | |
| N1a | Clone negative** | |
| N1a | Clone positive** | |
| N2 | Clinically abnormal* peripheral lymph nodes; histopathology Dutch grade 2 or NCI LN 3 | |
| N2a | Clone negative** | |
| N2b | Clone positive** | |
| N3 | Clinically abnormal* peripheral lymph nodes; histopathology Dutch grades 3–4 or NCI LN4; clone positive or negative** | |
| Nx | Clinically abnormal* peripheral lymph nodes; no histologic confirmation | |
| *For node, abnormal peripheral lymph node(s) indicates any palpable peripheral node that on physical examination is firm, irregular, clustered, fixed, or ≥ 1.5 cm in diameter. Central nodes, which are not generally amenable to pathologic assessment, are not currently considered in the nodal classification. **A T-cell clone is defined by polymerase chain reaction or Southern blot analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) gene. | ||
| N1 | Grade 1: dermatopathic lymphadenopathy (DL) | LN0: no atypical lymphocytes |
| N2 | Grade 2: DL; early involvement by MF (presence of cerebriform nuclei > 7.5 µm) | LN3: aggregates of atypical lymphocytes; nodal architecture preserved |
| N3 | Grade 3: partial effacement of LN architecture; many atypical cerebriform mononuclear cells (CMCs) | LN4: partial/complete effacement of nodal architecture by atypical lymphocytes or frankly neoplastic cells |
| M0 | No visceral organ involvement | |
| M1 | Visceral involvement (must have pathology confirmation* and the organ involved should be specified) | |
| *For viscera, spleen and liver may be diagnosed by imaging criteria. | ||
| B0 | Absence of significant blood involvement: ≤ 5% of peripheral blood lymphocytes are atypical (Sézary) cells | |
| B0a | Clone negative* | |
| B0b | Clone positive* | |
| B1 | Low blood-tumour burden: > 5% of peripheral blood lymphocytes are atypical (Sézary) cells but does not meet the criteria of B2 | |
| B1a | Clone negative* | |
| B1b | Clone positive* | |
| B2 | High blood-tumour burden: ≥ 1,000/µl Sézary cells** with positive clone | |
| *A T-cell clone is defined by polymerase chain reaction or Southern blot analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) gene; **or blood, Sézary cells are defined as lymphocytes with hyper-convoluted cerebriform nuclei. If Sézary cells are not able to be used to determine tumour burden, then one of the following modified ISCL criteria may be used instead: 1) expanded CD4+ or CD3+ cells with CD4/CD8 ratio of ≥ 10; and 2) expanded CD4+ cells with abnormal immunophenotype, including loss of CD7 or CD26. | ||
MF – Mycosis fungoides, NCI – National Cancer Institute, NCI-VA – National Cancer Institute – Veterans Affairs, PCR – polymerase chain reaction, TCR – T-cell receptor.
International Society for Cutaneous Lymphoma (ISCL) and European Society of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Anatomic Stage and Prognostic Groups of Mycosis Fungoides and the Sézary Syndrome
| Stage | T | N | M | Peripheral blood involvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I: | ||||
| IA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 |
| IB | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0,1 |
| II: | ||||
| IIA | 1,2 | 0–2 | 0 | 0,1 |
| IIB | 3 | 0–2 | 0,1 | |
| III: | 4 | 0–2 | 0 | 0,1 |
| IIIA | 4 | 0–2 | 0 | 0 |
| IIIB | 4 | 0–2 | 0 | 1 |
| IV: | ||||
| IVA1 | 1–4 | 0–2 | 0 | 2 |
| IVA2 | 1–4 | 3 | 0 | 0–2 |
| IVB | 1–4 | 0–3 | 1 | 0–2 |
Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) and evaluation of the progression/remission of the skin involvement (Rule of the Palm: the surface area of patient's palm with fingers equals 1% of the body surface)
| Body region | %BSA in body region | Assessment of involvement in patient's skin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch | Plaque | Tumour | ||
| Head | 7 | |||
| Neck | 2 | |||
| Anterior trunk | 13 | |||
| Arms | 8 | |||
| Forearms | 6 | |||
| Hands | 5 | |||
| Posterior trunk | 13 | |||
| Buttocks | 5 | |||
| Thighs | 19 | |||
| Legs | 14 | |||
| Feet | 7 | |||
| Groin | 1 | |||
| Subtotal of lesions (%BSA) | 100 | A | B | C |
| Weighting factor | ND | × 1 | × 2 | × 4 |
| Subtotal lesion (%BSA) × weighting factor | ND | A × 1 | B × 2 | C × 4 |
For skin, patch indicates any size lesion without any induration or significant elevation above the surrounding uninvolved skin. Poikiloderma should be noted.
For skin, plaque indicates any size lesion that is elevated or indurated; Crusting, ulceration, or poikiloderma may be present.
For skin, tumour indicates any solid or nodular lesion ≥ 1 cm in diameter with evidence of deep infiltration in the skin and/or vertical growth. For erythroderma, only patch and plaque columns should be considered.
mSWAT score equals the sum total of each column line: mSWAT = [(A × 1) + (B × 2) + (C × 4)]; %BSA – % body surface area; ND – not done.
Modified Severity Weighted Assessment Tool (mSWAT) evaluation of the response in skin
| Response | Definition |
|---|---|
| Complete response (CR) | 100% clearance of skin lesions |
| Partial response (PR) | 50–99% clearance of skin disease from baseline without new tumours (T3) in patients with T1, T2 or T4 (only skin disease) |
| Stable disease (SD) | < 25% increase to < 50% clearance in skin disease from baseline without new tumours (T3) in patients with T1, T2, or T4 (only skin disease) |
| Progressive disease (PD) | ≥ 25% mSWAT increase in skin disease from baseline or new tumours (T3) in patients with T1, T2 or T4 (only skin disease) or Loss of response: in those with complete or partial response, increase of skin score of greater than the sum of nadir plus 50% baseline score |
| Relapse | Any disease recurrence in those with complete response |
A biopsy of normal appearing skin is unnecessary to assign a complete response. However, a skin biopsy should be performed of a representative area of the skin if there is any question of residual disease (persistent erythema or pigmentary change) where otherwise a complete response would exist. If histologic features are suspicious or suggestive of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome, the response should be considered a partial response (PR) only.
Which ever criterion occurs first.
Figure 3Premycotic stage of mycosis fungoides
Figure 4Plaques in mycosis fungoides
Figure 5Mycosis fungoides – tumoral stage
Figure 6Tumour in mycosis fungoides
Figure 7Lymphomatoid papulosis