Literature DB >> 17438089

Vorinostat for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Bhupinder S Mann1, John R Johnson, Kun He, Rajeshwari Sridhara, Sophia Abraham, Brian P Booth, Leigh Verbois, David E Morse, Josephine M Jee, Sarah Pope, Ravi S Harapanhalli, Ramzi Dagher, Ann Farrell, Robert Justice, Richard Pazdur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To discuss vorinostat approval for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Data from 1 single-arm, open-label, multicenter pivotal trial and 11 other trials submitted to support the new drug application for vorinostat in the treatment of advanced primary CTCL were reviewed. The pivotal trial assessed responses by changes in overall skin disease score using a severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT). Vorinostat could be considered active in CTCL if observed response rate was at least 20% and the lower bound of the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) excluded 5%. Patients reported pruritus relief using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale.
RESULTS: The pivotal trial enrolled 74 patients with stage IB or higher CTCL. Median number of prior treatments was 3, and 61 patients (82%) had stage IIB or higher disease. The objective response rate in the skin disease assessed by change in the overall SWAT score from the baseline was 30% (95% CI, 18.5 to 42.6) in patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Median response duration (end of response defined by 50% increase in SWAT score from the nadir) was 168 days. Median time to tumor progression was 148 days for overall population and 169 days for patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Assessment of pruritus relief was considered unreliable.
CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat showed activity in CTCL, and skin responses were a clinical benefit. Vorinostat was approved for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of CTCL. A nonblinded, single-arm trial did not allow a reliable assessment of pruritus relief.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438089     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  85 in total

Review 1.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: beyond sorafenib.

Authors:  Stephen L Chan; Tony Mok; Brigette B Y Ma
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Prostate Cancer Epigenetics: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Angelo M De Marzo; William G Nelson
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

3.  Vorinostat and bortezomib exert synergistic antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in colon cancer cell models.

Authors:  Todd M Pitts; Mark Morrow; Sara A Kaufman; John J Tentler; S Gail Eckhardt
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Improved pruritus correlates with lower levels of IL-31 in CTCL patients under different therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Filiberto Cedeno-Laurent; Elisha M Singer; Maria Wysocka; Bernice M Benoit; Carmela C Vittorio; Ellen J Kim; Gil Yosipovitch; Alain H Rook
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid induces limited changes in the transcriptome of primary CD4(+) T cells.

Authors:  Nadejda Beliakova-Bethell; Jin X Zhang; Akul Singhania; Vivian Lee; Valeri H Terry; Douglas D Richman; Celsa A Spina; Christopher H Woelk
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Chemical targeting of the innate antiviral response by histone deacetylase inhibitors renders refractory cancers sensitive to viral oncolysis.

Authors:  Thi Lien-Anh Nguyên; Hesham Abdelbary; Meztli Arguello; Caroline Breitbach; Simon Leveille; Jean-Simon Diallo; Amber Yasmeen; Tarek A Bismar; David Kirn; Theresa Falls; Valerie E Snoulten; Barbara C Vanderhyden; Joel Werier; Harold Atkins; Markus J V Vähä-Koskela; David F Stojdl; John C Bell; John Hiscott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The inhibitors of histone deacetylase suberoylanilide hydroxamate and trichostatin A release nitric oxide upon oxidation.

Authors:  Yuval Samuni; Wilmarie Flores-Santana; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell; David A Wink
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  A phase II trial of vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in metastatic breast cancer: a California Cancer Consortium study.

Authors:  Thehang H Luu; Robert J Morgan; Lucille Leong; Dean Lim; Mark McNamara; Jana Portnow; Paul Frankel; David D Smith; James H Doroshow; Carol Wong; Ana Aparicio; David R Gandara; George Somlo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Vorinostat in solid and hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  David Siegel; Mohamad Hussein; Chandra Belani; Francisco Robert; Evanthia Galanis; Victoria M Richon; José Garcia-Vargas; Cesar Sanz-Rodriguez; Syed Rizvi
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Histone deacetylase inhibitor AR-42 enhances E7-specific CD8⁺ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity induced by therapeutic HPV DNA vaccination.

Authors:  Sung Yong Lee; Zhuomin Huang; Tae Heung Kang; Ruey-Shyang Soong; Jayne Knoff; Ellen Axenfeld; Chenguang Wang; Ronald D Alvarez; Ching-Shih Chen; Chien-Fu Hung; T-C Wu
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.