PURPOSE: To discuss vorinostat approval for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Data from 1 single-arm, open-label, multicenter pivotal trial and 11 other trials submitted to support the new drug application for vorinostat in the treatment of advanced primary CTCL were reviewed. The pivotal trial assessed responses by changes in overall skin disease score using a severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT). Vorinostat could be considered active in CTCL if observed response rate was at least 20% and the lower bound of the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) excluded 5%. Patients reported pruritus relief using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The pivotal trial enrolled 74 patients with stage IB or higher CTCL. Median number of prior treatments was 3, and 61 patients (82%) had stage IIB or higher disease. The objective response rate in the skin disease assessed by change in the overall SWAT score from the baseline was 30% (95% CI, 18.5 to 42.6) in patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Median response duration (end of response defined by 50% increase in SWAT score from the nadir) was 168 days. Median time to tumor progression was 148 days for overall population and 169 days for patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Assessment of pruritus relief was considered unreliable. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat showed activity in CTCL, and skin responses were a clinical benefit. Vorinostat was approved for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of CTCL. A nonblinded, single-arm trial did not allow a reliable assessment of pruritus relief.
PURPOSE: To discuss vorinostat approval for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Data from 1 single-arm, open-label, multicenter pivotal trial and 11 other trials submitted to support the new drug application for vorinostat in the treatment of advanced primary CTCL were reviewed. The pivotal trial assessed responses by changes in overall skin disease score using a severity-weighted assessment tool (SWAT). Vorinostat could be considered active in CTCL if observed response rate was at least 20% and the lower bound of the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) excluded 5%. Patients reported pruritus relief using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The pivotal trial enrolled 74 patients with stage IB or higher CTCL. Median number of prior treatments was 3, and 61 patients (82%) had stage IIB or higher disease. The objective response rate in the skin disease assessed by change in the overall SWAT score from the baseline was 30% (95% CI, 18.5 to 42.6) in patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Median response duration (end of response defined by 50% increase in SWAT score from the nadir) was 168 days. Median time to tumor progression was 148 days for overall population and 169 days for patients with stage IIB or higher disease. Assessment of pruritus relief was considered unreliable. CONCLUSIONS:Vorinostat showed activity in CTCL, and skin responses were a clinical benefit. Vorinostat was approved for treatment of cutaneous manifestations of CTCL. A nonblinded, single-arm trial did not allow a reliable assessment of pruritus relief.
Authors: Filiberto Cedeno-Laurent; Elisha M Singer; Maria Wysocka; Bernice M Benoit; Carmela C Vittorio; Ellen J Kim; Gil Yosipovitch; Alain H Rook Journal: Clin Immunol Date: 2015-03-08 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Nadejda Beliakova-Bethell; Jin X Zhang; Akul Singhania; Vivian Lee; Valeri H Terry; Douglas D Richman; Celsa A Spina; Christopher H Woelk Journal: AIDS Date: 2013-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Thi Lien-Anh Nguyên; Hesham Abdelbary; Meztli Arguello; Caroline Breitbach; Simon Leveille; Jean-Simon Diallo; Amber Yasmeen; Tarek A Bismar; David Kirn; Theresa Falls; Valerie E Snoulten; Barbara C Vanderhyden; Joel Werier; Harold Atkins; Markus J V Vähä-Koskela; David F Stojdl; John C Bell; John Hiscott Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yuval Samuni; Wilmarie Flores-Santana; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell; David A Wink Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2009-05-15 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Thehang H Luu; Robert J Morgan; Lucille Leong; Dean Lim; Mark McNamara; Jana Portnow; Paul Frankel; David D Smith; James H Doroshow; Carol Wong; Ana Aparicio; David R Gandara; George Somlo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David Siegel; Mohamad Hussein; Chandra Belani; Francisco Robert; Evanthia Galanis; Victoria M Richon; José Garcia-Vargas; Cesar Sanz-Rodriguez; Syed Rizvi Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2009-07-27 Impact factor: 17.388