Julien Le Guen1, Ariane Boumendil2, Bertrand Guidet3, Aline Corvol4, Olivier Saint-Jean1, Dominique Somme5. 1. Service de Gériatrie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France. 2. Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMRS-707, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. 3. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. 4. Centre de recherche sur l'action politique en Europe (CRAPE) UMR 6051, CNRS, Université Rennes 1, Rennes, France Service de Gériatrie, CHU de Rennes, Université Rennes 1, Faculté de médecine, Rennes, France. 5. Service de Gériatrie, CHU de Rennes, Université Rennes 1, Faculté de médecine, Rennes, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: demand for intensive care of the very elderly is growing, but few studies report inclusion of their opinions in the admission decision-making process. Whether or not to refer a very elderly patient to intensive care unit is a difficult decision that should take into account individual wishes, out of respect for the patient's decision-making autonomy. METHODS: in 15 emergency departments, patients over 80 years old who had a potential indication for admission to intensive care, and that were capable of expressing their opinion were included. Frequency of opinions sought before referral decision and individual and organisational factors associated were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: a total of 2,115 patients were included. Only 270 (12.7%) of them were asked for their opinion, and there were marked variations between study centres (minimum: 1.1% and maximum: 53.6%). A history of dementia reduced the probability of a patient being asked for his or her opinion (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83). Patients' opinion was most often sought when their functional autonomy was conserved (OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.39-3.21) and when a relative had been questioned (OR 5.46, 95% CI: 3.8-7.88). Older attending physicians were less likely to ask for the patient's opinion (older physician versus younger physician, OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: elderly patients are therefore rarely asked for their opinion prior to intensive care admission. Our results indicate that respect of the decision-making autonomy of elderly subjects in the admission process to an intensive care unit should be reinforced.
BACKGROUND: demand for intensive care of the very elderly is growing, but few studies report inclusion of their opinions in the admission decision-making process. Whether or not to refer a very elderly patient to intensive care unit is a difficult decision that should take into account individual wishes, out of respect for the patient's decision-making autonomy. METHODS: in 15 emergency departments, patients over 80 years old who had a potential indication for admission to intensive care, and that were capable of expressing their opinion were included. Frequency of opinions sought before referral decision and individual and organisational factors associated were recorded and analysed. RESULTS: a total of 2,115 patients were included. Only 270 (12.7%) of them were asked for their opinion, and there were marked variations between study centres (minimum: 1.1% and maximum: 53.6%). A history of dementia reduced the probability of a patient being asked for his or her opinion (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.25-0.83). Patients' opinion was most often sought when their functional autonomy was conserved (OR 2.10, 95% CI: 1.39-3.21) and when a relative had been questioned (OR 5.46, 95% CI: 3.8-7.88). Older attending physicians were less likely to ask for the patient's opinion (older physician versus younger physician, OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: elderly patients are therefore rarely asked for their opinion prior to intensive care admission. Our results indicate that respect of the decision-making autonomy of elderly subjects in the admission process to an intensive care unit should be reinforced.
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Rebecca A Hubbard; Lyle H Ungar; Michael O Harhay; Casey S Greene; Blanca E Himes; Scott D Halpern Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: H Flaatten; D W de Lange; A Artigas; D Bin; R Moreno; S Christensen; G M Joynt; Sean M Bagshaw; C L Sprung; D Benoit; M Soares; B Guidet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-02-25 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Bertrand Guidet; Hans Flaatten; Ariane Boumendil; Alessandro Morandi; Finn H Andersen; Antonio Artigas; Guido Bertolini; Maurizio Cecconi; Steffen Christensen; Loredana Faraldi; Jesper Fjølner; Christian Jung; Brian Marsh; Rui Moreno; Sandra Oeyen; Christina Agwald Öhman; Bernardo Bollen Pinto; Ivo W Soliman; Wojciech Szczeklik; Andreas Valentin; Ximena Watson; Tilemachos Zafeiridis; Dylan W De Lange Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gary E Weissman; Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Yihao Yuan; Rachel Kohn; George L Anesi; Peter W Groeneveld; Rachel M Werner; Scott D Halpern Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2020-01
Authors: Pierrick Le Borgne; Quentin Maestraggi; Sophie Couraud; François Lefebvre; Jean-Etienne Herbrecht; Alexandra Boivin; Baptiste Michard; Vincent Castelain; Georges Kaltenbach; Pascal Bilbault; Francis Schneider Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 3.240