Literature DB >> 26758478

How are qualitative methods used in diabetes research? A 30-year systematic review.

Monique M Hennink1, Bonnie N Kaiser2,3, Swathi Sekar1, Emily P Griswold1, Mohammed K Ali1,3.   

Abstract

We aimed to describe how qualitative methods are used in global research on diabetes and identify opportunities whereby qualitative methods could further benefit our understanding of the human experience of diabetes and interventions to address it. We conducted a systematic review of National Library of Medicine, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases to identify original research articles that used qualitative methods to study diabetes between 1980 and 2011. We identified 554 eligible articles and categorised these by geographic region, year of publication, study population, study design, research question, qualitative data collection methods, and journal type. Results show low use of qualitative methods in diabetes research over the past 30 years. The majority of articles (75%) reported using substantive qualitative research, while mixed-methods research has remained underutilised. Eighty-five per cent of articles reported studies conducted in North America or Europe, with few studies in developing countries. Most articles reported recruiting clinic-based populations (58%). Over half (54%) of research questions focused on patient experience and 24% on diabetes management. Qualitative methods can provide important insights about socio-cultural aspects of disease to improve disease management. However, they remain underutilised for understanding the diabetes experience, especially in Africa and Asia and amongst non-clinic populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetes; qualitative research; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758478     DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2015.1120337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Public Health        ISSN: 1744-1692


  3 in total

1.  Honoring the voices of families: An interpretive description of parents' understandings of, and insights into preventing type 2 diabetes in adolescents.

Authors:  Shelley Spurr; Jill Bally; Nahia Nalwooga
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 2.567

2.  Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want.

Authors:  Kristina F Simacek; Tanya Nelson; Mignon Miller-Baldi; Susan C Bolge
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Overcoming barriers to diabetes care in the hospital: The power of qualitative observations to promote positive change.

Authors:  Ariana Pichardo-Lowden; Michelle Farbaniec; Paul Haidet
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.431

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.