| Literature DB >> 26758076 |
Pernilla Foyer1,2, Erik Wilsson3, Per Jensen1.
Abstract
Dog puppies are born in a state of large neural immaturity; therefore, the nervous system is sensitive to environmental influences early in life. In primates and rodents, early experiences, such as maternal care, have been shown to have profound and lasting effects on the later behaviour and physiology of offspring. We hypothesised that this would also be the case for dogs with important implications for the breeding of working dogs. In the present study, variation in the mother-offspring interactions of German Shepherd dogs within the Swedish breeding program for military working dogs was studied by video recording 22 mothers with their litters during the first three weeks postpartum. The aim was to classify mothers with respect to their level of maternal care and to investigate the effect of this care on pup behaviour in a standardised temperament test carried out at approximately 18 months of age. The results show that females differed consistently in their level of maternal care, which significantly affected the adult behaviour of the offspring, mainly with respect to behaviours classified as Physical and Social Engagement, as well as Aggression. Taking maternal quality into account in breeding programs may therefore improve the process of selecting working dogs.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26758076 PMCID: PMC4725833 DOI: 10.1038/srep19253
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Results of the principal component analysis of the maternal care behavioural data revealed just one factor with eigenvalues greater than one.
| Behavioural Variable | Total Mother-Pup Interaction |
|---|---|
| Female in Box | 0.70 |
| Lying in contact/pup | 0.98 |
| Nursing/pup | 0.94 |
| Licking/pup | 0.90 |
| Sniff/Poke/pup | 0.92 |
| Total Variance Explained (%) | 80.0 |
The total variance explained by this factor, termed Total Mother-Pup Interaction (Total MPI), is 80.0%; N = 22.
Figure 1Difference in maternal behaviour between two groups of females.
Maternal behaviours during four days of observation over the three first weeks postpartum for five recorded variables: Mother in Box, Lying in contact, Nursing, Licking, and Sniff/poke. Graphs show the mean values (±s.e.m.) for the two groups of females based on their Total MPI scores; N(high) = 11, and N(low) = 11.
Results from the principal component analysis after Oblimin rotation with Kaiser normalisation.
| Behavioural Variable | Confidence | Physical Engagement | Social Engagement | Aggression |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V. Flight distance | −0.12 | −0.04 | 0.04 | |
| V. Secondary response | 0.00 | −0.12 | −0.14 | |
| V. Lasting effect | −0.01 | −0.18 | 0.14 | |
| G. Fearfulness | 0.07 | −0.17 | ||
| G. Secondary response | 0.16 | −0.19 | 0.35 | |
| G. Lasting effect | 0.26 | −0.32 | 0.23 | |
| Metal stair | −0.13 | 0.05 | 0.42 | |
| Reaction on table | −0.06 | −0.08 | −0.03 | |
| Object | 0.01 | −0.13 | −0.07 | |
| Affability | 0.11 | 0.17 | − | 0.10 |
| Handling | 0.05 | 0.07 | − | 0.20 |
| Leash | 0.19 | 0.25 | − | 0.16 |
| Reaction in dark room | 0.17 | −0.17 | − | 0.10 |
| V. Aggression | −0.15 | 0.04 | −0.19 | |
| G. Aggression | 0.41 | −0.11 | −0.14 | |
| Tug-of-war | 0.15 | 0.48 | −0.14 | −0.03 |
| Chasing | −0.02 | 0.26 | −0.17 | −0.06 |
| Interest in object | 0.09 | 0.05 | −0.20 | 0.20 |
| A. Flight distance | 0.46 | −0.02 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| A. Secondary response | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| A. Lasting effect | 0.29 | 0.18 | −0.13 | −0.09 |
| Search Intensity | 0.17 | 0.28 | −0.06 | 0.01 |
| Search Persistence | 0.25 | 0.28 | −0.13 | −0.07 |
| Gun-shot Fear | 0.03 | 0.32 | −0.36 | 0.30 |
| Gun-shot Curiosity | −0.04 | 0.25 | 0.19 | 0.12 |
| % Variance explained | 21.7 | 13.4 | 11.1 | 6.8 |
The table shows the SAF T-test variable loadings of the first four of the six components with eigenvalues >1. Loadings above 0.5 are shown in bold. A – acoustic startle sub-test; G – gradual visual startle sub-test; V – visual startle sub-test. The total variance explained by these four factors is 53.1%. N = 76.
Figure 2The relationship between Total MPI score and Confidence, Physical Engagement, Social Engagement and Aggression.
Scatter plots of litter mean PC scores for Confidence, Physical Engagement, Social Engagement and Aggression plotted against the Total MPI scores; N = 22.