Literature DB >> 26757926

Surface and structural effects of pitch and time on global melodic expectancies.

Jon B Prince1, Leong-Min Loo2.   

Abstract

We investigated how the surface and structural information of pitch and time in melodies contribute to the perceived expectancy of melodic segments. The contour (pitch surface), tonality (pitch structure), rhythm (time surface) and metre (time structure) were preserved or altered in factorial fashion, either for the full length of a melody (Full condition) or only its last phrase (Last condition). Participants (N = 24) with a range of musical training received instructions to rate how expected the second portion of a melody was, having heard its first part. Additionally, instructions varied across blocks to attend selectively to pitch, time, or both. Expectancy ratings for the Last condition were lower than for the Full condition, indicating that ratings truly reflected expectancy (rather than overall goodness, which would predict the opposite). Interestingly, tonality and rhythm contributed to global expectancy ratings, but not contour or metre. Furthermore, listeners were unable to ignore entirely either dimension, but successfully attenuated their influence in accordance with instructions. These findings offer a unique insight into music perception by testing expectancies of melody segments (beyond single-note continuations), factorially varying both the surface and structure of pitch and time, and using a selective attention manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757926     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0737-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  59 in total

1.  Long-term memory for temporal structure: evidence form the identification of well-known and novel songs.

Authors:  M D Schulkind
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

2.  Capture of attention in selective frequency listening.

Authors:  T J Green; J D McKeown
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Expectations for melodic contours transcend pitch.

Authors:  Jackson E Graves; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Probing the cognitive representation of musical time: structural constraints on the perception of timing perturbations.

Authors:  B H Repp
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-09

5.  Detection of metric structure in auditory figural patterns.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert; Lola L Cuddy
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-08

6.  The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music.

Authors:  Jon B Prince; Mark A Schmuckler; William F Thompson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-04

7.  Auditory feedback in music performance: the role of transition-based similarity.

Authors:  Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The auditory dynamic attending theory revisited: A closer look at the pitch comparison task.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina R Bauer; Manuela Jaeger; Jeremy D Thorne; Alexandra Bendixen; Stefan Debener
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Rhythm and "good endings": effects of temporal structure on tonality judgments.

Authors:  M Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-07

10.  The generation of temporal and melodic expectancies during musical listening.

Authors:  M G Boltz
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Listeners perceive complex pitch-temporal structure in melodies.

Authors:  Jon B Prince; Shih En Jeanelle Tan; Mark A Schmuckler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.