Literature DB >> 26757182

Beneficial Effects of an Integrated Psychostimulation Program in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Marta Ibarria1,2, Montserrat Alegret2, Sergi Valero3,4, Amèrica Morera1, Marina Guitart1, Pilar Cañabate1,2, Mariola Moreno1,2, Susana Lara1, Susana Diego1,2, Joan Hernández1, Natàlia Tantinyá1, Maribel Vera1, Isabel Hernández1,2, James T Becker5, Agustín Ruíz2, Mercè Boada1,2, Lluís Tárraga1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The existing pharmacological treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) can only slow the progression of symptoms or delay admission to long-term care facilities. The beneficial effects of non-drug treatments are poorly studied.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of an Integrated Psychostimulation Program (IPP) in patients with mild-moderate AD treated with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; and to identify factors related to greater benefit of the IPP.
METHODS: 206 patients (mean age = 75.9 years; MMSE = 19.6) were evaluated before starting the IPP and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months later. Measures included: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Cognitive Subscale of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), Rapid Disability Rating Scale (RDRS-2), and Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q).
RESULTS: Patients remained cognitively stable (MMSE/ADAS-Cog) for more than 6 months and significantly worsened at 9-month and 12-month follow-ups, without clinically significant functional changes (RDRS-2) or psychiatric symptoms(NPI-Q). The mean annual change on MMSE and ADAS-Cog were 2.06 and 3.56 points, respectively, lower than the annual decline demonstrated previously in similar patients (2.4 and 4.5, respectively). 42.7% of patients maintained or improved global cognitive scores between baseline and 12-month follow-up. The patients who maintained cognitive functions were older than those who did not (77.5 versus 74.7 years).
CONCLUSIONS: The IPP may be an effective treatment to maintain cognition, functionality, and psychiatric symptoms in AD patients pharmacologically treated, and older age seems to increase beneficial effects of IPP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s disease; Integral Psychostimulation Program; cognition; cognitive stimulation; dementia; functionality; non-pharmacological therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757182      PMCID: PMC4745126          DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis        ISSN: 1387-2877            Impact factor:   4.472


  40 in total

1.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Gene dose of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele and the risk of Alzheimer's disease in late onset families.

Authors:  E H Corder; A M Saunders; W J Strittmatter; D E Schmechel; P C Gaskell; G W Small; A D Roses; J L Haines; M A Pericak-Vance
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  The rapid disability rating scale-2.

Authors:  M W Linn; B S Linn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Effects of cognitive-communication stimulation for Alzheimer's disease patients treated with donepezil.

Authors:  Sandra Bond Chapman; Myron F Weiner; Audette Rackley; Linda S Hynan; Jennifer Zientz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Cognitive rehabilitation of mildly impaired Alzheimer disease patients on cholinesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  David A Loewenstein; Amarilis Acevedo; Sara J Czaja; Ranjan Duara
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.105

7.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  G McKhann; D Drachman; M Folstein; R Katzman; D Price; E M Stadlan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.

Authors:  B Reisberg; S H Ferris; M J de Leon; T Crook
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 18.112

9.  Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  W J Strittmatter; A M Saunders; D Schmechel; M Pericak-Vance; J Enghild; G S Salvesen; A D Roses
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  W G Rosen; R C Mohs; K L Davis
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Patient Engagement: The Fundació ACE Framework for Improving Recruitment and Retention in Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Authors:  Mercè Boada; Miguel A Santos-Santos; Octavio Rodríguez-Gómez; Montserrat Alegret; Pilar Cañabate; Asunción Lafuente; Carla Abdelnour; Mar Buendía; Maria José de Dios; América Morera; Ángela Sanabria; Laura Campo; Agustín Ruiz; Lluís Tárraga
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.472

2.  Dementia Care in Times of COVID-19: Experience at Fundació ACE in Barcelona, Spain.

Authors:  Alba Benaque; Miren Jone Gurruchaga; Carla Abdelnour; Isabel Hernández; Pilar Cañabate; Montserrat Alegret; Isabel Rodríguez; Maitee Rosende-Roca; Juan Pablo Tartari; Ester Esteban; Rogelio López; Silvia Gil; Liliana Vargas; Ana Mauleón; Ana Espinosa; Gemma Ortega; Angela Sanabria; Alba Pérez; Emilio Alarcón; Antonio González-Pérez; Marta Marquié; Sergi Valero; Lluís Tárraga; Agustín Ruiz; Mercè Boada
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.472

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.