Timothy P Welch1, Michael J Wallendorf, Evan D Kharasch, Jeffrey R Leonard, Allan Doctor, Jose A Pineda. 1. 1Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 2Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 3Division of Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. 4Department of Neurosurgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of bolus-dose fentanyl and midazolam to treat episodic intracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: PICU in a university-affiliated children's hospital level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-one children 0-18 years of age with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤ 8) who received bolus doses of fentanyl and/or midazolam for treatment of episodic intracranial hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The area under the curve from high-resolution intracranial pressure-time plots was calculated to represent cumulative intracranial hypertension exposure: area under the curve for intracranial pressure above 20 mm Hg (area under the curve-intracranial hypertension) was calculated in 15-minute epochs before and after administration of fentanyl and/or midazolam for the treatment of episodic intracranial hypertension. Our primary outcome measure, the difference between predrug and postdrug administration epochs (Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension), was calculated for all occurrences. We examined potential covariates including age, injury severity, mechanism, and time after injury; time after injury correlated with Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension. In a mixed-effects model, with patient as a random effect, drug/dose combination as a fixed effect, and time after injury as a covariate, intracranial hypertension increased after administration of fentanyl and/or midazolam (overall aggregate mean Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension = +17 mm Hg × min, 95% CI, 0-34 mm Hg × min; p = 0.04). The mean Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension increased significantly after administration of high-dose fentanyl (p = 0.02), low-dose midazolam (p = 0.006), and high-dose fentanyl plus low-dose midazolam (0.007). Secondary analysis using age-dependent thresholds showed no significant impact on cerebral perfusion pressure deficit (mean Δarea under the curve-cerebral perfusion pressure). CONCLUSIONS: Bolus dosing of fentanyl and midazolam fails to reduce the intracranial hypertension burden when administered for episodic intracranial hypertension. Paradoxically, we observed an overall increase in intracranial hypertension burden following drug administration, even after accounting for within-subject effects and time after injury. Future work is needed to confirm these findings in a prospective study design.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of bolus-dose fentanyl and midazolam to treat episodic intracranial hypertension in children with severe traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: PICU in a university-affiliated children's hospital level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-one children 0-18 years of age with severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤ 8) who received bolus doses of fentanyl and/or midazolam for treatment of episodic intracranial hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The area under the curve from high-resolution intracranial pressure-time plots was calculated to represent cumulative intracranial hypertension exposure: area under the curve for intracranial pressure above 20 mm Hg (area under the curve-intracranial hypertension) was calculated in 15-minute epochs before and after administration of fentanyl and/or midazolam for the treatment of episodic intracranial hypertension. Our primary outcome measure, the difference between predrug and postdrug administration epochs (Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension), was calculated for all occurrences. We examined potential covariates including age, injury severity, mechanism, and time after injury; time after injury correlated with Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension. In a mixed-effects model, with patient as a random effect, drug/dose combination as a fixed effect, and time after injury as a covariate, intracranial hypertension increased after administration of fentanyl and/or midazolam (overall aggregate mean Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension = +17 mm Hg × min, 95% CI, 0-34 mm Hg × min; p = 0.04). The mean Δarea under the curve-intracranial hypertension increased significantly after administration of high-dose fentanyl (p = 0.02), low-dose midazolam (p = 0.006), and high-dose fentanyl plus low-dose midazolam (0.007). Secondary analysis using age-dependent thresholds showed no significant impact on cerebral perfusion pressure deficit (mean Δarea under the curve-cerebral perfusion pressure). CONCLUSIONS: Bolus dosing of fentanyl and midazolam fails to reduce the intracranial hypertension burden when administered for episodic intracranial hypertension. Paradoxically, we observed an overall increase in intracranial hypertension burden following drug administration, even after accounting for within-subject effects and time after injury. Future work is needed to confirm these findings in a prospective study design.
Authors: W Marx; N Shah; C Long; E Arbit; J Galicich; C Mascott; K Mallya; R Bedford Journal: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol Date: 1989-03 Impact factor: 3.956
Authors: Patrick M Kochanek; Nancy Carney; P David Adelson; Stephen Ashwal; Michael J Bell; Susan Bratton; Susan Carson; Randall M Chesnut; Jamshid Ghajar; Brahm Goldstein; Gerald A Grant; Niranjan Kissoon; Kimberly Peterson; Nathan R Selden; Robert C Tasker; Karen A Tong; Monica S Vavilala; Mark S Wainwright; Craig R Warden Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Christopher M Traudt; Ivan Tkac; Kathleen M Ennis; Leah M Sutton; Daniel M Mammel; Raghavendra Rao Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: P David Adelson; Susan L Bratton; Nancy A Carney; Randall M Chesnut; Hugo E M du Coudray; Brahm Goldstein; Patrick M Kochanek; Helen C Miller; Michael D Partington; Nathan R Selden; Craig W Warden; David W Wright Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Marc D Schmittner; Susanne L Vajkoczy; Peter Horn; Thomas Bertsch; Michael Quintel; Peter Vajkoczy; Elke Muench Journal: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.956
Authors: N Ketharanathan; Y Yamamoto; U Rohlwink; E D Wildschut; M Hunfeld; E C M de Lange; D Tibboel Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2017-09-06 Impact factor: 1.475