Literature DB >> 26757033

Survey of Intraoperative Bacterial Contamination in Dogs Undergoing Elective Orthopedic Surgery.

Natalia Andrade1, Chad W Schmiedt1, Karen Cornell1, MaryAnn G Radlinsky1, Lauren Heidingsfelder1, Kevin Clarke1, David J Hurley2, Whitney D Hinson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency, source, and risk factors of intraoperative (IO) surgeon and patient bacterial contamination during clean orthopedic surgeries, and to investigate the relationship between IO contamination and surgical site infection (SSI) in dogs. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Client-owned dogs undergoing stifle surgery (n = 100).
METHODS: IO cultures were taken in each case from surgical foot wrap, peri-incisional skin, surgical gloves, and the surgical team's hands. The environment (operating room [OR] lights, computers, scrub sink faucet, anesthesia gurney, and radiology table) was sampled every 5 months. Bacteria were identified and the contamination of each case was categorized. All gloves from the surgical team were collected and tested for perforations using a water infusion test. Cases were followed for at least 8 weeks to determine the presence or absence of SSI. Perioperative variables were evaluated for association with IO contamination and SSI.
RESULTS: Bacterial isolates were yielded from 81% of procedures from 1 or more sources; 58% had positive hand cultures, 46% had positive glove cultures, 23% had positive patient skin cultures, and 12% had positive foot wrap cultures. Staphylococcus spp. was the most commonly recovered bacteria. There was no apparent association between IO contamination and SSI. The highest level of environmental contamination was associated with the scrub sink faucet, followed by the radiology table, anesthesia gurney, and OR computers. The IO glove perforation rate was 18%.
CONCLUSION: Clean orthopedic procedures commonly had clinically insignificant bacterial contamination. In our study, bacteria responsible for SSI did not appear to colonize the patient in the OR. © Copyright 2016 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757033     DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  5 in total

Review 1.  Re-examining causes of surgical site infections following elective surgery in the era of asepsis.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Neil Hyman; Jack Gilbert
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 2.  Preparing the Bowel for Surgery: Learning from the Past and Planning for the Future.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Neil Hyman; Jack Gilbert; James N Luo; Monika Krezalek
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  The role of the microbiota in surgical recovery.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; John C Alverdy
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Sequential bacterial sampling of the midline incision in horses undergoing exploratory laparotomy.

Authors:  C M Isgren; S E Salem; N B Townsend; D Timofte; T W Maddox; D C Archer
Journal:  Equine Vet J       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Esophagostomy tube complications in dogs and cats: Retrospective review of 225 cases.

Authors:  Olivia Nathanson; Kathryn McGonigle; Kathryn Michel; Darko Stefanovski; Dana Clarke
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.