| Literature DB >> 29679416 |
C M Isgren1,2, S E Salem1,3, N B Townsend4, D Timofte5,6, T W Maddox7, D C Archer1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is limited information about bacterial isolates that are present on the equine midline incision during and following exploratory laparotomy.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial; bacterial culture; colic; drug-resistant; horse; surgical site infection
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29679416 PMCID: PMC6585715 DOI: 10.1111/evj.12958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Equine Vet J ISSN: 0425-1644 Impact factor: 2.888
Figure 1Flow chart to show recruitment of horses into, and their progression through the study.
Figure 2Proportion of horses with a negative, single or mixed growth culture at different time points from prior to aseptic preparation of midline until discharge from hospital or death. Mixed growth were those where more than one type of bacterial isolate were identified.
A summary of bacteriological examination results of collected samples (257 samples)
| Sample time point | No. of horses sampled | No. (%) of positive culture | No. (%) of mixed growth | No. (%) of single growth | Most common bacterial species isolated | No. of DR/MDR isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31 | 29 (93.5) | 24 (82.8) | 5 (17.2) |
| 3 |
| 2 | 31 | 1 (3.2) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) |
| 0 |
| 3 | 31 | 6 (19.4) | 0 (0) | 6 (%) |
| 1 |
| 4 | 31 | 5 (16.1) | 0 (0) | 5 (%) |
| 1 |
| 5 | 31 | 11 (35.5) | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) |
| 6 |
| 6 | 30 | 19 (63.3) | 12 (63.2) | 7 (36.8) |
| 26 |
| 7 | 29 | 22 (75.9) | 11 (50.0) | 11 (50.0) |
| 31 |
| 8 | 19 | 17 (89.5) | 10 (58.8) | 7 (41.2) |
| 26 |
| 9 | 10 | 7 (70.0) | 5 (71.4) | 2 (28.6) |
| 9 |
| 10 | 7 | 7 (100) | 4 (57.1) | 3 (42.9) |
| 8 |
| 11 | 5 | 5 (100) | 3 (60.5) | 2 (40.0) |
| 9 |
| 12 | 2 | 2 (100) | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) |
| 4 |
Sampling time point: 1) immediately following clipping but prior to aseptic preparation of the ventral midline; 2) following aseptic preparation but immediately before first incision was made; 3) following closure of linea alba but before lavage of the incision, using sterile polyionic fluids; 4) following closure of the skin; 5) immediately following recovery from general anaesthesia after removal of the protective dressing; and 6)–12) every 48 h during hospitalisation when the abdominal dressing was changed. DR, drug resistance (resistance to ≥1 class of antimicrobials); MDR, multi‐drug resistance (resistance to ≥3 classes of antimicrobials).
Figure 3Proportion of Gram‐positive (G+ve) and Gram‐negative (G−ve) isolates at different time points from prior to aseptic preparation of midline until discharge from hospital or death.
Figure 4Percentage of drug resistant (DR) (resistance to ≥1 class of antimicrobials) and multi drug resistant (MDR) (resistance to ≥3 classes of antimicrobials) isolates during the study period.
Culture results at peri‐operative time points in the seven horses that developed surgical site infection (SSI)
| Horse | Linea alba | Skin closure | Following recovery | SSI culture |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ng | ng |
|
|
| 2 | ng | ng | ng | No culture obtained |
| 3 |
| ng | ng |
|
| 4 | ng | ng | ng | No culture obtained |
| 5 |
|
| ng | No culture obtained |
| 6 | ng |
|
|
|
| 7 |
| ng |
| No culture obtained |
No culture was obtained in those horses where SSI developed following hospital discharge. ng, no growth.