Literature DB >> 26756159

Sentence Recognition in Quiet and Noise by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users: Relationships to Spoken Language.

Laurie S Eisenberg1, Laurel M Fisher, Karen C Johnson, Dianne Hammes Ganguly, Thelma Grace, John K Niparko.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated associations between sentence recognition and spoken language for children with cochlear implants (CI) enrolled in the Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study. STUDY
DESIGN: In a prospective longitudinal study, sentence recognition percent-correct scores and language standard scores were correlated at 48-, 60-, and 72-months post-CI activation.
SETTING: Six tertiary CI centers in the United States. PATIENTS: Children with CIs participating in the CDaCI study. INTERVENTION (S): Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE (S): Sentence recognition was assessed using the Hearing In Noise Test for Children (HINT-C) in quiet and at +10, +5, and 0 dB signal-to-noise ratio (S/N). Spoken language was assessed using the Clinical Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL) core composite and the antonyms, paragraph comprehension (syntax comprehension), syntax construction (expression), and pragmatic judgment tests.
RESULTS: Positive linear relationships were found between CASL scores and HINT-C sentence scores when the sentences were delivered in quiet and at +10 and +5 dB S/N, but not at 0 dB S/N. At 48 months post-CI, sentence scores at +10 and +5 dB S/N were most strongly associated with CASL antonyms. At 60 and 72 months, sentence recognition in noise was most strongly associated with paragraph comprehension and syntax construction.
CONCLUSIONS: Children with CIs learn spoken language in a variety of acoustic environments. Despite the observed inconsistent performance in different listening situations and noise-challenged environments, many children with CIs are able to build lexicons and learn the rules of grammar that enable recognition of sentences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756159      PMCID: PMC4712714          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  24 in total

1.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.

Authors:  L M Friesen; R V Shannon; D Baskent; X Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Recognition of lexically controlled words and sentences by children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Amy Schaefer Martinez; Suzanne R Holowecky; Stephanie Pogorelsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models.

Authors:  Ronghui Xu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.

Authors:  P J Blamey; J Z Sarant; L E Paatsch; J G Barry; C P Bow; R J Wales; M Wright; C Psarros; K Rattigan; R Tooher
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.

Authors:  K E Fishman; R V Shannon; W H Slattery
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.

Authors:  A Boothroyd; S Nittrouer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Communication abilities of children with aided residual hearing: comparison with cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen Iler Kirk; Amy Schaefer Martinez; Elizabeth A Ying; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-05

10.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults.

Authors:  S Nittrouer; A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  12 in total

1.  Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Mary C Luckasen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Simultaneous communication supports learning in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Helen Blom; Marc Marschark; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2016-12-23

3.  Vocabulary Acquisition as a By-Product of Meaning-Oriented Auditory Training for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing.

Authors:  Joe Barcroft; Heather Grantham; Elizabeth Mauzé; Brent Spehar; Mitchell S Sommers; Colleen Spehar; Nancy Tye-Murray
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Yitao Mao; Li Xu
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 2.117

5.  Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Jourdan T Holder; Adrian L Taylor; Linsey W Sunderhaus; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Deaf Children of Hearing Parents Have Age-Level Vocabulary Growth When Exposed to American Sign Language by 6 Months of Age.

Authors:  Naomi Caselli; Jennie Pyers; Amy M Lieberman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Raymond L Goldsworthy; Laurie S Eisenberg; Liat Kishon-Rabin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Mishaela DiNino; Julie G Arenberg
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Spatial Release From Masking in 2-Year-Olds With Normal Hearing and With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Christi L Hess; Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  Listening in Noise Remains a Significant Challenge for Cochlear Implant Users: Evidence from Early Deafened and Those with Progressive Hearing Loss Compared to Peers with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Yael Zaltz; Yossi Bugannim; Doreen Zechoval; Liat Kishon-Rabin; Ronen Perez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.