Literature DB >> 26755927

How to Utilize Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.

Hyung-Yoon Kim1, Jin-Ho Choi2.   

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has high negative predictive power for detecting coronary artery disease. However CCTA is limited by moderate positive predictive power in the detection of myocardial ischemia. This is not unexpected because the diameter of a stenosis is a poor indicator of myocardial ischemia and discrepancy between the severity of stenosis and noninvasive tests is not uncommon. The value of stenosis for predicting future development of acute coronary syndrome represented by plaque rupture has been questioned. CCTA identifies the characteristics of high-risk plaque including positive remodeling, low density plaque and spotty or micro-calcification. Also, additional evaluation of myocardial ischemia using computational flow dynamics, and luminal attenuation gradient are expected to increase both diagnostic performance for hemodynamically significant stenosis and the predictive power for future cardiovascular risk. Technical advances in CCTA would enable evaluation of both coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia simultaneously with high predictive performance, and would improve vastly the clinical value of CCTA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atherosclerosis; Coronary CT angiography; Coronary artery disease; Functional ischemia; Myocardial mass; Prognosis

Year:  2015        PMID: 26755927      PMCID: PMC4707304          DOI: 10.4250/jcu.2015.23.4.204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Ultrasound        ISSN: 1975-4612


Introduction

Coronary atherosclerosis is a chronic life-long progressive disease. Most clinical presentations of the disease are as a result of a critical narrowing of arterial lumen or a sudden thrombotic occlusion caused by the rupture of atherosclerotic plaque. Unfortunately prediction of such clinically adverse events is difficult by clinical judgement or symptoms alone.1)2)3) Comprehensive approach of coronary atherosclerotic plaque including qualitative and quantitative analysis is necessary for the accurate lesion assessment and treatment planning as well as for the prediction of future outcome (Fig. 1).4)5)
Fig. 1

Anatomical versus physiological evaluation of coronary atherosclerosis. TCFA: thin-cap fibroatheroma.

Conventional invasive coronary angiography (CAG) has been regarded as the gold standard for coronary artery disease but has limitation for assessing the extent of mild to moderate coronary atherosclerosis.6) Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) are needed to quantitate the burden of atherosclerosis. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can be considered as a non-invasive method that may substitute CAG and IVUS.7)8) CCTA is still limited by spatial and temporal resolution but enables non-invasive patient-friendly assessment of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis.9) Therefore it is expected that CCTA will be useful in overcoming limitations of the current diagnosis and treatment of coronary heart disease as shown below.

Demonstrating the Presence of Coronary Artery Disease

CCTA has emerged as a new noninvasive tool for screening of coronary artery disease in place of conventional stress imag-ing or electrocardiography.10)11) Therapeutic strategy of coronary artery disease depends on the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. CCTA can visualize the extent of severity of coronary artery disease with good sensitivity and excellent specificity.12)13) The performance of CCTA for plaque detection has been validated by IVUS and OCT.7)14) Unlike stress imaging or invasive CAG, CCTA can detect a wide range of coronary artery disease from mild to severe disease.15)16)

Prediction of Future Coronary Heart Disease Incidents

It is difficult to predict future cardiac events through symptoms or clinical risk factors.17)18) Clinical studies have shown that one-third of acute myocardial infarctions are asymptomatic prior to the event.19)20)21) Most chronic total occlusions have infarct scar which is evidence of prior myocardial infarction but only half of them had a history of angina symptoms.22)23) A CCTA is suitable to identify anatomical coronary stenosis, including calcified and non-calcified plaques, measure the atherosclerotic plaque burden and its response to treatment, and differentiate stable plaques from those that tend to rupture.24) Positive remodeling, low density (< 30 Hounsfield units) plaque, napkin-ring sign and spotty or micro-calcification detected by CCTA has been shown to have vulnerable plaque characteristics (Fig. 2).24)25)26)27) These non-invasive findings have been validated by invasive IVUS and OCT studies.1)26)27) Moreover, non-contrast coronary calcium CT scan is also useful to evaluate the risk of coronary artery disease using a coronary calcium score and it is well demonstrated to be related to long-term prognosis.28)
Fig. 2

Characteristics of coronary atherosclerotic plaque detected on CCTA. A: Severe stenosis. B: Positive remodeling. C: Partially calcified or "spotty" calcification. D: Low attenuated plaque (< 30 HU). CCTA: coronary computed tomography angiography, HU: Hounsfield unit.

Accordingly, CCTA can detect the presence of a coronary atherosclerosis most accurately and is one of the best non-invasive imaging modality to predict the clinical outcome of coronary artery disease as well.29)

Roles of CCTA on Determining the Treatment Policy of Coronary Artery Disease

The treatment goal of coronary artery disease is the improvement of survival as well as relief of symptom. Revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery has relieved symptom but has been questioned for improved long-term outcome.30)31) Refinement of the need of revascularization strategy would be required to achieve improved clinical outcome after revascularization procedure including percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass surgery. The followings are proposed treatment strategy of coronary artery disease based on the CCTA. First is to detect coronary atherosclerosis using CCTA. CCTA has the highest diagnostic power to find coronary atherosclerosis among non-invasive imaging modalities and hence very high negative predictive value.1)16) Second is to assess myocardial ischemia non-invasively with CCTA. The presence of myocardial ischemia is the most important factor for making a prognosis and for the decision to perform a revascularization.31) However less than half of coronary arteries with a diameter stenosis ≥ 50% cause myocardial ischemia in most clinical studies.31)32)33) It would be greatly preferable to find the functional significance of a stenosis as well as the presence of a stenosis by single CCTA test. Myocardial computed tomography perfusion imaging could be utilized in clinical practice.34)35)36) Computational fractional flow reserve based on computed fluid dynamics analysis37)38) and contrast gradient analysis39)40) are being investigated.41)42)43) Third, it would be important to evaluate the amount of ischemic myocardial mass. Several studies have investigated the relationship between the angiographic severity of stenosis and the amount of perfused myocardial tissue. Duke jeopardy score,44)45) myocardial jeopardy index,46) and Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) lesion score44)47) have been used to evaluate the burden of myocardium-at-risk based on angiographic extent of stenosis. However these scoring systems are limited by semi-quantitative grading of the severity of coronary artery disease and myocardium-at-risk. Detailed anatomical variations of individual vessels, myocardial mass, and location of stenosis is not taken account in these semi-quantitative scores. Nuclear perfusion studies have shown that the clinical benefit of revascularization became evident when the ischemic burden exceeds 12% to 15% of total myocardial mass.48)49)50) CCTA enables exact quantitative assessment of the burden of myocardium-at-risk and the extent of coronary artery disease (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Risk assessment of coronary artery disease in the future. APPROACH: Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease, FFR: fractional flow reserve, PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention, SYNTAX: Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery.

Conclusions

CCTA can find coronary artery disease, determine the significance of coronary artery disease, and guide treatment strategy including revascularization. Now it is time to validate and investigate the role of CCTA in clinical practice and the impact of CCTA on the clinical outcome. Further research on this area is warranted in the future.
  50 in total

1.  Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Brian S Ko; James D Cameron; Ian T Meredith; Michael Leung; Paul R Antonis; Arthur Nasis; Marcus Crossett; Sarah A Hope; Sam J Lehman; John Troupis; Tony DeFrance; Sujith K Seneviratne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 2.  Noninvasive Imaging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression: Status of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography.

Authors:  Veit Sandfort; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.792

3.  Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  Tiago A Magalhães; Satoru Kishi; Richard T George; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Andrea L Vavere; Christopher Cox; Matthew B Matheson; Julie M Miller; Jeffrey Brinker; Marcelo Di Carli; Frank J Rybicki; Carlos E Rochitte; Melvin E Clouse; João A C Lima
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-03-21

4.  Frequency of myocardial infarction and its relationship to angiographic collateral flow in territories supplied by chronically occluded coronary arteries.

Authors:  Jin-Ho Choi; Sung-A Chang; Jin-Oh Choi; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Seung Hyuk Choi; Sang-Chol Lee; Sang-Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Yeonhyeon Choe; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Authors:  Ryo Nakazato; Ran Heo; Jonathon Leipsic; James K Min
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR.

Authors:  Martin Greif; Franz von Ziegler; Fabian Bamberg; Janine Tittus; Florian Schwarz; Melvin D'Anastasi; Roy P Marcus; Jan Schenzle; Christoph Becker; Konstantin Nikolaou; Alexander Becker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Prospective, head-to-head comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, quantitative computed tomography angiography, and intravascular ultrasound for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions, using fractional flow reserve as reference standard (from the ATLANTA I and II Study).

Authors:  Szilard Voros; Sarah Rinehart; Jesus G Vazquez-Figueroa; Anna Kalynych; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Zhen Qian; Parag H Joshi; Hunt Anderson; Laura Murrieta; Charles Wilmer; Harold Carlson; William Ballard; Charles Brown
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score.

Authors:  R M Califf; H R Phillips; M C Hindman; D B Mark; K L Lee; V S Behar; R A Johnson; D B Pryor; R A Rosati; G S Wagner
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  Management of Coronary Artery Calcium and Coronary CTA Findings.

Authors:  Dustin M Thomas; Sanjay Divakaran; Todd C Villines; Khurram Nasir; Nishant R Shah; Ahmad M Slim; Ron Blankstein; Michael K Cheezum
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2015
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The Different Facets of Dyslipidemia and Hypertension in Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Jessica Hurtubise; Krystie McLellan; Kevin Durr; Oluwadara Onasanya; Daniel Nwabuko; Joseph Fomusi Ndisang
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  A multifunctional CT technology: Reality or illusion for patient risk assessment?

Authors:  Tomoaki Nakata
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Using coronary CT angiography for guiding invasive coronary angiography: potential role to reduce intraprocedural radiation exposure.

Authors:  Christophe T Arendt; Patricia Tischendorf; Julian L Wichmann; Michael Messerli; Lucas Jörg; Niklas Ehl; Robin F Gohmann; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Henry Anselmo Mayala; Khamis Hassan Bakari; Wang Zhaohui
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.875

5.  The role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Henry Anselmo Mayala; Khamis Hassan Bakari; Wang Zhaohui
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.875

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.