BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess peripheral retinal lesions and the posterior pole in single widefield optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes. METHODS: A wide field of view (FOV) swept-source OCT (WFOV SSOCT) system was developed using a commercial swept-source laser and a custom sample arm consisting of two indirect ophthalmic lenses. Twenty-seven subjects with peripheral lesions (choroidal melanomas, choroidal naevi, sclerochoroidal calcification, retinitis pigmentosa, diabetic retinopathy, retinoschisis and uveitis) were imaged with the WFOV SSOCT. Volumes were taken in primary gaze. Using the optic nerve to fovea distance as a reference measurement, comparisons were made between the lateral FOV of the WFOV SSOCT, current generation spectral-domain OCT (SDOCT) and widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) of the same eyes. RESULTS: Peripheral pathologies were captured with WFOV SSOCT in 26 of the 27 subjects. The one not captured was in the far nasal periphery and was not seen in the primary gaze volume. Posterior pole associated pathologies were captured in all subjects. Current generation SDOCT had a mean lateral FOV of 2.08±0.21 optic nerve to fovea distance units, WFOV SSOCT had an FOV of 4.62±0.62 units and SLO had an FOV of 9.35±1.02 units. CONCLUSIONS: WFOV OCT can be used to examine both peripheral retinal pathology and the posterior pole within a single volume acquisition. SLO had the greatest FOV, but does not provide depth information. Future studies using widefield OCT systems will help further delineate the role of WFOV OCT to quantitatively assess and monitor peripheral retinal disease in three dimensions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess peripheral retinal lesions and the posterior pole in single widefield optical coherence tomography (OCT) volumes. METHODS: A wide field of view (FOV) swept-source OCT (WFOV SSOCT) system was developed using a commercial swept-source laser and a custom sample arm consisting of two indirect ophthalmic lenses. Twenty-seven subjects with peripheral lesions (choroidal melanomas, choroidal naevi, sclerochoroidal calcification, retinitis pigmentosa, diabetic retinopathy, retinoschisis and uveitis) were imaged with the WFOV SSOCT. Volumes were taken in primary gaze. Using the optic nerve to fovea distance as a reference measurement, comparisons were made between the lateral FOV of the WFOV SSOCT, current generation spectral-domain OCT (SDOCT) and widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (SLO) of the same eyes. RESULTS: Peripheral pathologies were captured with WFOV SSOCT in 26 of the 27 subjects. The one not captured was in the far nasal periphery and was not seen in the primary gaze volume. Posterior pole associated pathologies were captured in all subjects. Current generation SDOCT had a mean lateral FOV of 2.08±0.21 optic nerve to fovea distance units, WFOV SSOCT had an FOV of 4.62±0.62 units and SLO had an FOV of 9.35±1.02 units. CONCLUSIONS: WFOV OCT can be used to examine both peripheral retinal pathology and the posterior pole within a single volume acquisition. SLO had the greatest FOV, but does not provide depth information. Future studies using widefield OCT systems will help further delineate the role of WFOV OCT to quantitatively assess and monitor peripheral retinal disease in three dimensions. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Authors: D Huang; E A Swanson; C P Lin; J S Schuman; W G Stinson; W Chang; M R Hee; T Flotte; K Gregory; C A Puliafito Journal: Science Date: 1991-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Min Sagong; Jano van Hemert; Lisa C Olmos de Koo; Cullen Barnett; SriniVas R Sadda Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Pearse A Keane; Musarrat Allie; Stephen J Turner; H Sue Southworth; Srinivas R Sadda; Philip I Murray; Alastair K Denniston Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Jasmine H Francis; Claudine E Pang; David H Abramson; Tatyana Milman; Robert Folberg; Sarah Mrejen; K Bailey Freund Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Daniel E Croft; Jano van Hemert; Charles C Wykoff; David Clifton; Michael Verhoek; Alan Fleming; David M Brown Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Ryan P McNabb; James Polans; Brenton Keller; Moseph Jackson-Atogi; Charlene L James; Robin R Vann; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: James Polans; Brenton Keller; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Francesco LaRocca; Elijah Cole; Heather E Whitson; Eleonora M Lad; Sina Farsiu; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-12-02 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Ryan P McNabb; James Tian; Sina Farsiu; Joseph A Izatt; Eleonora M Lad; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: José Lezama; Dibyendu Mukherjee; Ryan P McNabb; Guillermo Sapiro; Anthony N Kuo; Sina Farsiu Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Anthony N Kuo; Pavan K Verkicharla; Ryan P McNabb; Carol Y Cheung; Saima Hilal; Sina Farsiu; Christopher Chen; Tien Y Wong; M Kamran Ikram; Ching Y Cheng; Terri L Young; Seang M Saw; Joseph A Izatt Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Brenton Keller; Christian Viehland; Liangbo Shen; Michael I Seider; Joseph A Izatt; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ryan P McNabb; Alice S Liu; Sidney M Gospe; Mays El-Dairi; Landon C Meekins; Charlene James; Robin R Vann; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Retina Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 3.975