BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate quantification of retinal surface area from ultra-widefield (UWF) images is challenging due to warping produced when the retina is projected onto a two-dimensional plane for analysis. By accounting for this, the authors sought to precisely montage and accurately quantify retinal surface area in square millimeters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Montages were created using Optos 200Tx (Optos, Dunfermline, U.K.) images taken at different gaze angles. A transformation projected the images to their correct location on a three-dimensional model. Area was quantified with spherical trigonometry. Warping, precision, and accuracy were assessed. RESULTS: Uncorrected, posterior pixels represented up to 79% greater surface area than peripheral pixels. Assessing precision, a standard region was quantified across 10 montages of the same eye (RSD: 0.7%; mean: 408.97 mm(2); range: 405.34-413.87 mm(2)). Assessing accuracy, 50 patients' disc areas were quantified (mean: 2.21 mm(2); SE: 0.06 mm(2)), and the results fell within the normative range. CONCLUSION: By accounting for warping inherent in UWF images, precise montaging and accurate quantification of retinal surface area in square millimeters were achieved. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate quantification of retinal surface area from ultra-widefield (UWF) images is challenging due to warping produced when the retina is projected onto a two-dimensional plane for analysis. By accounting for this, the authors sought to precisely montage and accurately quantify retinal surface area in square millimeters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Montages were created using Optos 200Tx (Optos, Dunfermline, U.K.) images taken at different gaze angles. A transformation projected the images to their correct location on a three-dimensional model. Area was quantified with spherical trigonometry. Warping, precision, and accuracy were assessed. RESULTS: Uncorrected, posterior pixels represented up to 79% greater surface area than peripheral pixels. Assessing precision, a standard region was quantified across 10 montages of the same eye (RSD: 0.7%; mean: 408.97 mm(2); range: 405.34-413.87 mm(2)). Assessing accuracy, 50 patients' disc areas were quantified (mean: 2.21 mm(2); SE: 0.06 mm(2)), and the results fell within the normative range. CONCLUSION: By accounting for warping inherent in UWF images, precise montaging and accurate quantification of retinal surface area in square millimeters were achieved. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.
Authors: Ryan P McNabb; Dilraj S Grewal; Rajvi Mehta; Stefanie G Schuman; Joseph A Izatt; Tamer H Mahmoud; Glenn J Jaffe; Prithvi Mruthyunjaya; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Gina Yu; Michael T Aaberg; Tapan P Patel; Rahul S Iyengar; Corey Powell; Annie Tran; Caitlin Miranda; Emma Young; Katarina Demetriou; Laxmi Devisetty; Yannis M Paulus Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Lajos Csincsik; Thomas J MacGillivray; Erin Flynn; Enrico Pellegrini; Giorgos Papanastasiou; Neda Barzegar-Befroei; Adrienne Csutak; Alan C Bird; Craig W Ritchie; Tunde Peto; Imre Lengyel Journal: Ophthalmic Res Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Alice C Jiang; Sunil K Srivastava; Ming Hu; Natalia Figueiredo; Amy Babiuch; Joseph D Boss; Jamie L Reese; Justis P Ehlers Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-08-28
Authors: Artur V Cideciyan; Malgorzata Swider; Sharon B Schwartz; Edwin M Stone; Samuel G Jacobson Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.799