Literature DB >> 26753219

Comparison of Models and Indices for Detecting Rater Centrality.

Edward W Wolfe, Tian Song.   

Abstract

To date, much of the research concerning rater effects has focused on rater severity/leniency. Consequently, other potentially important rater effects have largely ignored by those conducting operational scoring projects. This simulation study compares four rater centrality indices (rater fit, residual-expected correlations, rater slope, and rater threshold variance) in terms of their Type I and Type II error rates under varying levels of centrality magnitude, centrality pervasiveness, and rating scale construction when each of four latent trait models is fitted to the simulated data (Rasch rating scale and partial credit models and the generalized rating scale and partial credit models). Results indicate that the residual-expected correlation may be most appropriately sensitive to rater centrality under most conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26753219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  6 in total

1.  Examining the Impacts of Rater Effects in Performance Assessments.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-08-05

2.  Essay Selection Methods for Adaptive Rater Monitoring.

Authors:  Chun Wang; Tian Song; Zhuoran Wang; Edward Wolfe
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-25

3.  Exploring Incomplete Rating Designs With Mokken Scale Analysis.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Yogendra J Patil
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Exploring the Combined Effects of Rater Misfit and Differential Rater Functioning in Performance Assessments.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Wenjing Guo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Detecting Differential Rater Functioning in Severity and Centrality: The Dual DRF Facets Model.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Jin; Thomas Eckes
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 3.088

6.  Detecting Rater Biases in Sparse Rater-Mediated Assessment Networks.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Yuan Ge
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.088

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.