Literature DB >> 26753072

First evidence for (TTAGG)n telomeric sequence and sex chromosome post-reduction in Coleorrhyncha (Insecta, Hemiptera).

Valentina G Kuznetsova1, Snejana M Grozeva2, Viktor Hartung3, Boris A Anokhin1.   

Abstract

Telomeric repeats are general and significant structures of eukaryotic chromosomes. However, nothing is known about the molecular structure of telomeres in the enigmatic hemipteran suborder Coleorrhyncha (moss bugs) commonly considered as the sister group to the suborder Heteroptera (true bugs). The true bugs are known to differ from the rest of the Hemiptera in that they display an inverted sequence of sex chromosome divisions in male meiosis, the so-called sex chromosome post-reduction. To date, there has been no information about meiosis in Coleorrhyncha. Here we report a cytogenetic observation of Peloridium pomponorum, a representative of the single extant coleorrhynchan family Peloridiidae, using the standard chromosome staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with a (TTAGG) n telomeric probe. We show that Peloridium pomponorum displays 2n = 31 (30A + X) in males, the classical insect (TTAGG) n telomere organization and sex chromosome post-reduction during spermatocyte meiosis. The plesiomorphic insect-type (TTAGG) n telomeric sequence is suggested to be preserved in Coleorrhyncha and in a basal heteropteran infraorder Nepomorpha, but absent (lost) in the advanced heteropteran lineages Cimicomorpha and Pentatomomorpha. The telomere structure in other true bug infraorders is currently unknown. We consider here the inverted sequence of sex chromosome divisions as a synapomorphy of the group Coleorrhyncha + Heteroptera.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (TTAGG)n telomeric sequence; Coleorrhyncha; Hemiptera; Karyotype; Peloridiidae; Peloridium pomponorum; sex chromosome post-reduction

Year:  2015        PMID: 26753072      PMCID: PMC4698568          DOI: 10.3897/CompCytogen.v9i4.5609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Cytogenet        ISSN: 1993-0771            Impact factor:   1.800


Introduction

(moss bugs) are little-known insects believed to be relict members (survivors) of an ancient evolutionary lineage which split off from the rest of during the late Palaeozoic. The suborder includes the sole extant family with 17 genera and 37 species in South America (Argentina and Chile), Australia, New Zealand, New Caledonia, and Lord Howe Island. The phylogenetic relationships of peloridiids within , the largest nonholometabolan insect assemblage, have been a matter of contentious debates for a long time. In the past, they have been variously assigned to or but today, the peloridiids are generally put to their own suborder and are commonly considered as the sister group to the suborder (Wootton 1965, Schlee 1969, Wheeler et al. 1993, Campbell et al. 1995, Ouvrard et al. 2000, Burckhardt 2009, Cryan and Urban 2012), whereas there is also some support for other opinions (Cobben 1978, Popov and Shcherbakov 1996, Cui et al. 2013). Recently, the first cytogenetic data on were published (Grozeva et al. 2014b). Males of Bergroth, 1924 from New Zealand were reported to display paired testes composed each of a single follicle, holokinetic chromosomes, a karyotype of 2n = 27 (26A + X), sex chromosome system of an X(0) type, and one chiasma in every bivalent in meiosis. The ends of chromosomes are known to be cupped by specific nucleoprotein structures, the telomeres, which are responsible for their stability. DNA of the telomeric regions consists of tandemly repeated short nucleotide motifs. Comparative analysis of these motifs in different groups of organisms showed that they tend to be conserved in particular groups, for example, TTTAGGG in plants, TTAGGC in nematodes, TTAGG in arthropods, and TTAGGG in vertebrates (Traut et al. 2007, Lukhtanov and Kuznetsova 2010). Information on the telomere structure is presently available for many groups of insects (Sahara et al. 1999, Frydrychová et al. 2004, Vitková et al. 2005, Grozeva et al. 2010, 2011, Kuznetsova et al. 2012, 2015, Maryańska-Nadachowska et al. 2013, Golub et al. 2014, 2015, Gokhman et al. 2014, Vershinina et al. 2015, Lachowska-Cierlik et al. 2015). Among insects, the (TTAGG) sequence has been detected in most tested orders and is considered as the ancestral telomeric motif not only for insects but also for all arthropods (Vitková et al. 2005). Despite of this, in several insect groups, e.g. in , in some and , the classical insect-type (TTAGG) motif is absent (Frydrychová and Marec 2002, Frydrychová et al. 2004, Vitková et al. 2005, Gokhman et al. 2014). Among , the advanced infraorders and also appear to have lost this telomeric motif (Grozeva et al. 2011 and references therein, Golub et al. 2015). PageBreakAlthough data on other infraorders were absent, there was a general belief that all members of the lost the (TTAGG) motif (Frydrychová et al. 2004, Lukhtanov and Kuznetsova 2010, Grozeva et al. 2010, 2011). However, the recent finding of this motif in a more basal true bug infraorder (Kuznetsova et al. 2012) showed that the are heterogeneous for the telomere organization. The are known to differ from the rest of the in that they display an inverted sequence of sex chromosome divisions during spermatocyte meiosis, the so-called sex chromosome post-reduction. To date, there has been no information about meiosis in . In this paper we present first data on telomere structure and male meiosis in . We report the karyotype, meiosis with special reference to the behavior of sex chromosomes, and molecular composition of telomeres in males of Shcherbakov, 2014.

Material and methods

Specimens of were collected at the Biological Station Senda Darwin (Chile, Region X, Isla Grande de Chiloé, Ancud) in January-February 2014 from three different species of Linnaeus, 1753 ( Wilson, 1847, Bridel, 1798 and Bescherelle, 1885) and Müller, 1851; fixed alive in 3:1 ethanol/acetic acid and shipped in the fixative a couple of weeks later to the lab, where further analyses were undertaken. Preparations were made from testes, which were dissected in a drop of 45% acetic acid and squashed under a coverslip on a glass microscope slide. The slides were frozen using dry ice, the coverslips were removed with a razor blade, and the preparations were air dried. Spread chromosome plates were found in testes of 19 males (a total of 32 adults and the last instar nymphs were examined). For the standard staining, the method described in Grozeva and Nokkala (1996) with minor modifications was used. In brief, the preparations were first subjected to hydrolysis in 1 N HCl at room temperature for 20 min, then at 60 °C for 8 min and stained in Schiff’s reagent for 20 min. After rinsing thoroughly in distilled water, the preparations were additionally stained in 4% Giemsa in Sorensen’s buffer, pH 6.8 for 20 min, rinsed with distilled water, air-dried, and mounted in Entellan. The molecular structure of telomeres was investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosomes (FISH) with a (TTAGG) probe. The telomere probe was generated by non-template PCR and labelled with Rhodamine-5-dUTP (GeneCraft, Cologne, Germany). FISH was performed as described in Grozeva et al. (2011, 2014a). Chromosome preparations were treated with 100 μg/ml RNaseA, incubated in 5 mg/ml pepsin in 0.01 M HCl to remove excessive amounts of RNAs and proteins. After pretreatment, the chromosomes were hybridized with a hybridization mixture containing about 100 ng of labelled probe and 10 μg of sonicated salmon-sperm DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Chromosomes were mounted in an antifade medium (ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI, Invitrogen) and covered with a glass coverslip. Chromosome slides were analyzed under a Leica DM 6000 B microscope; images were taken with a Leica DFC 345 FX camera using Leica Application Suite 3.7 software with an Image Overlay module.

Results

In males, the paired testes are composed each of a single follicle, and the meiotic karyotype comprises 16 elements, including 15 autosomal bivalents and a univalent X chromosome, at first metaphase (MI) (Figs 1–3). Thus, the male diploid karyotype of the species consists of 2n = 31 (30A + X). The chromosomes show no primary constrictions (the centromeres), thereby testifying that they are holokinetic and display, instead of localized, a diffuse kinetochore. The bivalents constitute a continuous series gradually decreasing in size and form each one, rarely two, chiasmata. The X chromosome appears as one of the smallest chromosomes in the karyotype. At the first anaphase (AI), the autosomes segregate reductionally, whereas the univalent sex chromosome undergoes the equational division (the separation of sister chromatids) (Fig. 4), so that all the second metaphases (MII) carry the X chromosome (Fig. 5). It is notable that the X chromosome tends to be situated outside the division plane both in MI and MII plates.
Figures 1–5.

Male meiotic chromosomes of subjected to standard staining (1, 4, 5) and FISH with a (TTAGG) telomeric probe (2, 3). 1 MI, n = 16 (15AA + X) 2, 3 MI, n = 16 (15AA + X); hybridization signals (red) are located at the ends of chromosomes 4 AI, the sister chromatids (arrowed) of X chromosome are separated and oriented toward opposite spindle poles 5 part of a secondary spermatocyte cyst; X chromosome is present in every MII plate evidencing for the equational division during the first division. Bar = 10 µm.

Male meiotic chromosomes of subjected to standard staining (1, 4, 5) and FISH with a (TTAGG) telomeric probe (2, 3). 1 MI, n = 16 (15AA + X) 2, 3 MI, n = 16 (15AA + X); hybridization signals (red) are located at the ends of chromosomes 4 AI, the sister chromatids (arrowed) of X chromosome are separated and oriented toward opposite spindle poles 5 part of a secondary spermatocyte cyst; X chromosome is present in every MII plate evidencing for the equational division during the first division. Bar = 10 µm. In all the preparations, a (TTAGG) telomeric probe hybridized to the ends of the chromosomes (Fig. 2, 3) indicative of the presence of this telomeric nucleotide sequence in .

Discussion

So far, the only coleorrhynchan species with known karyotype was (Grozeva et al. 2014b). Males of this species originated from New Zealand were shown to have holokinetic chromosomes, as all other , and karyotype of 2n = 27 (26A + X). Despite difference in the number of autosomes, i.e. 26 in while 30 in from Chile analyzed here, these species appear similar in that they have paired testes consisting each of a single follicle (a pattern probably shared by all peloridiids; Grozeva et al. 2014b), holokinetic chromosomes (like in all other ; White 1973), the formation of one, rarely two, chiasmata per bivalent (a characteristic property of holokinetic bivalents; Nokkala et al. 2004), the sex chromosome system of an X(0) type, decreasing size differences between chromosomes, and the X as one of the smallest chromosomes of the set. The male diploid chromosome number in true bugs ranges from 2n=4 to 2n=80; however, the great majority of the studied species show 2n varying between 14 and 34 (Papeschi and Bressa 2006) and, thus, both chromosome numbers found to date in peloridiid species fall into this range. The X(0) sex determination system is generally accepted as an ancestral one in (Blackman 1995). This system is prevailing in most , with the only exception of the . In this group, an XY system appears characteristic of the overwhelming majority of studied species whereas an X(0) system occurs only sporadically, being encountered in separate representatives of both primitive and advanced taxa (Ueshima 1979, Papeschi and Bressa 2006, Kuznetsova et al. 2011). Two contradictory hypotheses for the evolution of sex chromosomes in true bugs supported by different sources of evidence have been proposed. One of these holds that the XY system has evolved from an X(0) system (Ueshima 1979) while the other assumes that the XY mechanism is plesiomorphic, the existence of the X(0) true bug species being a result of the repeated loss of the Y chromosome during the evolution (Nokkala and Nokkala 1983, 1984, Grozeva and Nokkala 1996). Deducing the ancestral state of a character for the taxon requires knowledge on this character state in the basal taxa. Of the two most primitive true bug infraorders, and (Štys and Kerzhner 1975), the cytogenetic information is currently available for the six species of the latter (Cobben 1968, Grozeva and Nokkala 1996). Species of the genera Kıyak, 1995, Herrich-Schaeffer, 1835 and Fieber, 1860 (the family ) were shown to differ both in chromosome number and sex chromosome systems. Specifically, (Linnavuori, 1951) displays 2n = 22 (18A + 2m? + XY) (Grozeva and Nokkala 1996, as Linnavuori, 1951); Hill, 1987 – 2n = 22 (18A + 2m + XY); (J. Sahlberg, 1870) – 2n = 21 (16A + 2m + XY1Y2); while Fieber, 1860 (Cobben 1968: as J. Sahlberg, 1875) – 2n = 21 (20A + X). On the other hand, both studied representatives of the family , namely, Hill, 1980 and Hill, 1984, were found to share 2n = 33 (30A + 2m + X) (Grozeva and Nokkala 1996). The occurrence of an X(0) system both in dipsocorids and schizopterids as well as in peloridiids seems to favor the Ueshima’s (1979) hypothesis, however, much more data from the primitive true bug taxa are needed to choose with certainty between the two alternatives. With very rare exceptions (e.g. the family ; Ueshima 1979, Golub et al. 2015), true bugs show an inverted sequence of sex chromosome divisions in male meiosis, the so-called “sex chromosome post-reduction” (Ueshima 1979). It means that, in spermatocyte meiosis the first division is reductional for the autosomes and equational for the sex chromosomes, whereas the second division is, on the other hand, reductional for the sex chromosomes and equational for the autosomes. The significance of this unusual pattern is unknown. We observed that males likewise share the sex chromosome post-reduction. Taking into account that all other members of the display the “normal” pre-reductional sequence of sex chromosome divisions (White 1973), we consider the inverted sequence as a synapomorphy of the group + . Recently, it has been shown that the classical insect (TTAGG) telomeric sequence is absent in members of the evolutionarily advanced true bug infraorders PageBreak(at least in the families , and for which data are available) and (at least in the families and for which data are available) (Frydrychová et al. 2004, Grozeva et al. 2010, 2011, Golub et al. 2015). Moreover, dot-blot hybridization of genomic DNA from the n species Linnaeus, 1758, (Fabricius, 1787), and sp. did not suggest any other candidate telomeric sequence, including, besides the insect TTAGG, also ciliate TTTTGGGG and TTGGGG, nematode TTAGGC, shrimp TAACC, vertebrate TTAGGG, and plant TTTAGGG (Grozeva et al. 2011) thus leaving the question of the telomeric motif(s) in these species open. However in more recent times, the presence of the (TTAGG) telomeric repeat was documented by FISH for the family from a more basal true bug infraorder (Kuznetsova et al. 2012) and now is confirmed for the peloridiid species . These new findings reinforce the hypothesis (Kuznetsova et al. 2012) that the plesiomorphic insect-type (TTAGG) telomere structure preserved in the basal true bug taxa was subsequently lost during the further evolution of the , at least in the last ancestor of a monophyletic lineage including and .
  15 in total

1.  18S rRNA secondary structure and phylogenetic position of Peloridiidae (Insecta, hemiptera).

Authors:  D Ouvrard; B C Campbell; T Bourgoin; K L Chan
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 2.  [What gene and chromosomes say about the origin and evolution of insects and other arthropods].

Authors:  V A Lukhtanov; V G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  2010-09

3.  The evolutionary origin of insect telomeric repeats, (TTAGG)n.

Authors:  Magda Vítková; Jirí Král; Walther Traut; Jan Zrzavý; Frantisek Marec
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Holocentric chromosomes in meiosis. I. Restriction of the number of chiasmata in bivalents.

Authors:  S Nokkala; V G Kuznetsova; A Maryanska-Nadachowska; C Nokkala
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  The telomere repeat motif of basal Metazoa.

Authors:  Walther Traut; Monika Szczepanowski; Magda Vítková; Christian Opitz; Frantisek Marec; Jan Zrzavý
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Achiasmatic male meiosis in two species of Saldula (Saldidae, Hemiptera).

Authors:  S Nokkala; C Nokkala
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.271

7.  TTAGG telomeric repeats in chromosomes of some insects and other arthropods.

Authors:  K Sahara; F Marec; W Traut
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.239

8.  Cytogenetics of the true bug infraorder Cimicomorpha (Hemiptera, Heteroptera): a review.

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Snejana M Grozeva; Seppo Nokkala; Christina Nokkala
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 1.546

9.  Karyotypes, male meiosis and comparative FISH mapping of 18S ribosomal DNA and telomeric (TTAGG) n repeat in eight species of true bugs (Hemiptera, Heteroptera).

Authors:  S Grozeva; V G Kuznetsova; B A Anokhin
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 1.800

10.  The first finding of (TTAGG)n telomeric repeat in chromosomes of true bugs (Heteroptera, Belostomatidae).

Authors:  Valentina G Kuznetsova; Snejana M Grozeva; Boris A Anokhin
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 1.800

View more
  11 in total

1.  Universal fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) protocol for mapping repetitive DNAs in insects and other arthropods.

Authors:  Diogo Cavalcanti Cabral-de-Mello; František Marec
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.291

2.  Karyotype stability in the family Issidae (Hemiptera, Auchenorrhyncha) revealed by chromosome techniques and FISH with telomeric (TTAGG)n and 18S rDNA probes.

Authors:  Anna Maryańska-Nadachowska; Boris A Anokhin; Vladimir M Gnezdilov; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 1.800

3.  The presence of the ancestral insect telomeric motif in kissing bugs (Triatominae) rules out the hypothesis of its loss in evolutionarily advanced Heteroptera (Cimicomorpha).

Authors:  Sebastián Pita; Francisco Panzera; Pablo Mora; Jesús Vela; Teresa Palomeque; Pedro Lorite
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Comparison of different cytogenetic methods and tissue suitability for the study of chromosomes in Cimex lectularius (Heteroptera, Cimicidae).

Authors:  David Sadílek; Robert B Angus; František Šťáhlavský; Jitka Vilímová
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 1.800

5.  Chromosomal distribution of interstitial telomeric sequences as signs of evolution through chromosome fusion in six species of the giant water bugs (Hemiptera, Belostoma).

Authors:  Mónica G Chirino; Martina Dalíková; František R Marec; María J Bressa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  New evidence for the presence of the telomere motif (TTAGG) n in the family Reduviidae and its absence in the families Nabidae and Miridae (Hemiptera, Cimicomorpha).

Authors:  Snejana Grozeva; Boris A Anokhin; Nikolay Simov; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 7.  Comparative cytogenetics of Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera, Homoptera): a review.

Authors:  Valentina Kuznetsova; Dora Aguin-Pombo
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.546

8.  Maternal Inheritance of a Single Somatic Animal Cell Displayed by the Bacteriocyte in the Whitefly Bemisia tabaci.

Authors:  Junbo Luan; Xuepeng Sun; Zhangjun Fei; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  A chromosomal analysis of Nepa cinerea Linnaeus, 1758 and Ranatra linearis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Heteroptera, Nepidae).

Authors:  Robert B Angus; Constance Jeangirard; Desislava Stoianova; Snejana Grozeva; Valentina G Kuznetsova
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.800

Review 10.  The epigenetic regulation of centromeres and telomeres in plants and animals.

Authors:  Magdalena Achrem; Izabela Szućko; Anna Kalinka
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 1.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.