Literature DB >> 26753065

Common bile duct diameter in an asymptomatic population: A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Rong Peng1, Ling Zhang1, Xiao-Ming Zhang1, Tian-Wu Chen1, Lin Yang1, Xiao-Hua Huang1, Ze-Ming Zhang1.   

Abstract

AIM: To measure the common bile duct (CBD) diameter by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in a large asymptomatic population and analyze its some affecting factors.
METHODS: This study included 862 asymptomatic subjects who underwent MRCP. The CBD diameter was measured at its widest visible portion on regular end-expiration MRCP for all subjects. Among these 862 subjects, 221 volunteers also underwent end-inspiration MRCP to study the effect of respiration on the CBD diameter. The age, sex, respiration, body length, body weight, body mass index (BMI), portal vein diameter (PVD), length of the extrahepatic duct and CBD, cystic junction radial orientation and location were recorded. The subjects were divided into 7 groups according to age. All of the above factors were compared with the CBD diameter on end-expiration MRCP.
RESULTS: Among the 862 subjects, the CBD diameter was 4.13 ± 1.11 mm (range, 1.76-9.45 mm) and was correlated with age (r = 0.484; P < 0.05), with a dilation of 0.033 mm per year. The upper limit of the 95% reference range was 5.95 mm, resulting in a reasonable upper limit of 6 mm for the asymptomatic population. Respiration and other factors, including sex, body length, body weight, BMI, PVD, length of the extrahepatic duct and CBD, cystic junction radial orientation and location, were not related to the CBD diameter.
CONCLUSION: We established a reference range for the CBD diameter on MRCP for an asymptomatic population. The CBD diameter is correlated with age. Respiration did not affect the non-dilated CBD diameter.

Keywords:  Adult; Biliary tract; Common bile duct; Magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2015        PMID: 26753065      PMCID: PMC4697124          DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v7.i12.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Radiol        ISSN: 1949-8470


  23 in total

1.  Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: a study with 64-slice CT.

Authors:  Senem Senturk; Tugba Cezlan Miroglu; Aslan Bilici; Hatice Gumus; Rojbin Ceylan Tekin; Faysal Ekici; Güven Tekbas
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.528

2.  Factors affecting common bile duct diameter.

Authors:  Salam Daradkeh; Emad Tarawneh; Azmy Al-Hadidy
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

3.  [SEEDO 2007 Consensus for the evaluation of overweight and obesity and the establishment of therapeutic intervention criteria].

Authors:  Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Miguel A Rubio; Montserrat Barbany; Basilio Moreno
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 1.725

4.  Ultrasound measurements of the bile ducts and gallbladder: normal ranges and effects of age, sex, cholecystectomy, and pathologic states.

Authors:  George R Matcuk; Edward G Grant; Philip W Ralls
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.657

5.  Anatomic variations of the intrahepatic bile ducts: analysis of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 1011 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Fatma Uysal; Funda Obuz; Aysun Uçar; Mustafa Seçil; Enis Igci; Oğuz Dicle
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Is age associated with size of adult extrahepatic bile duct: sonographic study.

Authors:  M M Horrow; J C Horrow; A Niakosari; C L Kirby; H K Rosenberg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Respiratory variation of extrahepatic bile duct diameter during ultrasonography.

Authors:  R H Wachsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Low conjunction of the cystic duct with the common bile duct: does it correlate with the formation of common bile duct stones?

Authors:  I Tsitouridis; G Lazaraki; C Papastergiou; E Pagalos; G Germanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Determination of Diameter and Angulation of the Normal Common Bile Duct using Multidetector Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Park; Don Haeng Lee; Seok Jeong; Soon Gu Cho
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  [The age-related characteristics of the muscular layer of the common bile duct in man].

Authors:  G P Kialian; A V Aznaurian
Journal:  Morfologiia       Date:  1995
View more
  1 in total

1.  Quantitative MRCP Imaging: Accuracy, Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Cohort-Derived Normative Ranges.

Authors:  Marc H Goldfinger; Gerard R Ridgway; Carlos Ferreira; Caitlin R Langford; Lin Cheng; Arina Kazimianec; Andrea Borghetto; Thomas G Wright; Gary Woodward; Neelam Hassanali; Rowan C Nicholls; Hayley Simpson; Tom Waddell; Siddarth Vikal; Marija Mavar; Soubera Rymell; Ioan Wigley; Jaco Jacobs; Matt Kelly; Rajarshi Banerjee; J Michael Brady
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 4.813

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.