Literature DB >> 16334751

Factors affecting common bile duct diameter.

Salam Daradkeh1, Emad Tarawneh, Azmy Al-Hadidy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of the study was to see the effect of age, sex, body mass index, previous cholecystectomy, hepatomegaly and fasting status on the common bile duct diameter.
METHODOLOGY: A series of 463 patients, 283 females and 180 males, with no hepatobiliary or pancreatic pathology were included in this study, the mean age was 45 +/- 16 years. Their age, sex, weight, height, fasting status and previous cholecystectomy was assessed and recorded by a physician prior to ultrasound examination. All patients were examined by real-time ultrasound to see if there was any pathology in the hepatobiliary and pancreatic area. Those with history of common bile duct exploration, endoscopic sphincterotomy or with previous history of cholecystectomy of less than 6 months and patients with common bile duct pathology were excluded from the study. The midportion of the common bile duct was taken as a fixed measurement for all patients and the size of the liver was also recorded. Analysis of variance as part of SPSS statistical package was used where common bile duct was considered a dependent variable, while sex, fasting status, hepatomegaly and previous cholecystectomy were considered to be independent variables, age and sex were considered as co-variants.
RESULTS: The factors found to be significantly affecting the diameter of the common bile duct (P<0.05) were age, previous cholecystectomy and body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: If the CBD dilatation can not be explained by age, previous cholecystectomy and BMI, a pathology causing obstruction should be ruled out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16334751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  7 in total

1.  Common bile duct diameter in an asymptomatic population: A magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Rong Peng; Ling Zhang; Xiao-Ming Zhang; Tian-Wu Chen; Lin Yang; Xiao-Hua Huang; Ze-Ming Zhang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-28

2.  Clinical significance and long-term outcome of incidentally found bile duct dilatation.

Authors:  Jaryong Jeon; Song Yi Song; Kyu Taek Lee; Kwang Hyuck Lee; Mun Hee Bae; Jong Kyun Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis: From guidelines to clinical practice.

Authors:  Joana Magalhães; Bruno Rosa; José Cotter
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-02-16

4.  Ultrasonographic measurement of normal common bile duct diameter and its correlation with age, sex and anthropometry.

Authors:  Nidhi Lal; Simmi Mehra; Vivek Lal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

5.  Asymptomatic Bile Duct Dilatation in Children: Is It a Disease?

Authors:  Yeo Ju Son; Mi Jung Lee; Hong Koh; Seung Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2015-09-25

6.  Clinical course of biliary-type sphincter of Oddi dysfunction: endoscopic sphincterotomy and functional dyspepsia as affecting factors.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Miyatani; Hirosato Mashima; Masanari Sekine; Satohiro Matsumoto
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-08-12

7.  An assessment of the yield of EUS in patients referred for dilated common bile duct and normal liver function tests.

Authors:  Matthew S Kaspy; Galab M Hassan; Sarto C Paquin; Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.628

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.