| Literature DB >> 26752200 |
Longhua Zhou1, Yuanlong Li1, Nazim Hussain1, Zhilan Li1, Dezhi Wu1, Lixi Jiang1.
Abstract
Efficient molecular markers for the selection of rapeseed genetic materials with high seed oil content and ideal fatty acid (FA) composition are preferred by rapeseed breeders. Recently, we reported the molecular mechanism of TRANSPARENT TESTA 2 (TT2) in inhibiting seed FA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. However, evidence showing the association of rapeseed TT2 homologs and seed FA production are still insufficient. In this study, we collected 83 rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) landraces from different geographical backgrounds to conduct association mapping of BnaC.TT2.a in relation to seed coat color and FA biosynthesis. Population background was corrected by 84 pairs of SSR markers that were uniformly distributed among the linkage groups of the Tapidor-Ningyou-7 DH population. A single copy of BnaC.TT2.a for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) assay was cloned by a pair of previously reported specific primers. From the analysis of BnaC.TT2.a allelic variations using GLM+Q model, four SNPs on intron 1 of BnaC.TT2.a that were associated with seed FA were discovered. Moreover, an InDel at position 738 on exon 3 of BnaC.TT2.a indicated a change of protein function that was significantly associated with seed coat color, linoleic acid (C18:2), and total FA content. These findings revealed the role of BnaC.TT2.a in regulating the seed color formation and seed FA biosynthesis in rapeseed, thereby suggesting effective molecular markers for rapeseed breeding.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26752200 PMCID: PMC4709174 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of 83 genotypes of B. napus into different haplotype groups on the basis of population structure analysis at BnaC.TT2.a gene locus.
| A.N. | Origin | Haplotype | A.N. | Origin | Haplotype | A.N. | Origin | Haplotype | A.N. | Origin | Haplotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rajanpur, PK | H3(POP1) | 22 | Dara, PK | H3(POP1) | 43 | Risalpur, PK | H0(POP1) | 64 | IOC 2w019, Hunang, CN | H0(POP2) |
| 2 | Pakpattan, PK | H4(POP1) | 23 | Swabi, PK | H0(POP1) | 44 | Chamkani, PK | H0(POP1) | 65 | Gan-lan-xing 077, Hubei, CN | H6(POP2) |
| 3 | Swabi, PK | H0(POP1) | 24 | Rawalpindi, PK | H3(POP1) | 45 | Tarnol, PK | H3(POP1) | 66 | Luo-jing-xuan-xi, Shanghai, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 4 | Nowshera, PK | H4(POP1) | 25 | Tank, PK | H2(POP1) | 46 | Wazir abad, PK | H3(POP1) | 67 | IOC 79–1, Shanghai, CN | H5(POP2) |
| 5 | Mardan, PK | H1(POP1) | 26 | Islamsbad, PK | H0(POP1) | 47 | Shabqadar, PK | H0(POP1) | 68 | R-line 4190, Shanghai, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 6 | Bannu, PK | H3(POP1) | 27 | Haripur, PK | H3(POP1) | 48 | Khairabad, PK | H3(POP1) | 69 | IOC 78251, Zhejiang, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 7 | Attock, PK | H0(POP1) | 28 | Nowshera, PK | H0(POP1) | 49 | Kurram Agency, PK | H3(POP1) | 70 | IOC 135, Anhui, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 8 | Lasbela, PK | H4(POP1) | 29 | Batgram, PK | H3(POP1) | 50 | Zhe-shuang 72, Zhejiang, CN | H0(POP2) | 71 | IOC 135, Shanghai, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 9 | Laki, PK | H0(POP1) | 30 | Charat, PK | H0(POP1) | 51 | Zhe-da 619, Zhejiang, CN | H0(POP2) | 72 | IOC cuan-205, Sichuan, CN | H0(POP2) |
| 10 | Taxila, PK | H3(POP1) | 31 | Mianwali, PK | H0(POP1) | 52 | Zhe-shuang 758, Zhejiang, CN | H2(POP2) | 73 | IOC 3145–20, Hunang, CN | H0(POP2) |
| 11 | Hassan Abdal, PK | H3(POP1) | 32 | Bannu, PK | H4(POP1) | 53 | Hu-you-qing, Shanghai, CN | H0(POP1) | 74 | Mei-jian, Xizang, CN | H0(POP1) |
| 12 | Kohat, PK | H2(POP1) | 33 | Nowshera, PK | H0(POP1) | 54 | Falcon, DE | H3(POP1) | 75 | Fu-you 4, Heilongjiang, CN | H0(POP1) |
| 13 | Kusur, PK | H0(POP1) | 34 | Laki, PK | H3(POP1) | 55 | Gao-you 605, Zhejiang, CN | H3(POP2) | 76 | Fu-you 2, Fujian, CN | H1(POP2) |
| 14 | Dado kandao, PK | H3(POP1) | 35 | Charsadda, PK | H2(POP1) | 56 | ap-NPZ, DE | H3(POP1) | 77 | IOC 7515, Jiangxi, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 15 | Mardan, PK | H3(POP1) | 36 | Charat, PK | H3(POP1) | 57 | Ap-tengbe, DE | H4(POP1) | 78 | Xiang 85–16, Hunang, CN | H4(POP2) |
| 16 | Abba khel, PK | H1(POP1) | 37 | Narowal, PK | H4(POP1) | 58 | Ap-rakow, CA | H0(POP1) | 79 | 75–1, Jiangxi, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 17 | Peshawar, PK | H2(POP1) | 38 | Okara, PK | H2(POP1) | 59 | Ap-renavd, FR | H3(POP1) | 80 | Westa, CA | H0(POP1) |
| 18 | Islamsbad, PK | H0(POP1) | 39 | Dara, PK | H3(POP1) | 60 | IOC 84–24016, Shanghai, CN | H4(POP2) | 81 | Zhong-shuang 6, Hubei, CN | H0(POP2) |
| 19 | TakhtNusrati, PK | H3(POP1) | 40 | Rawalpindi, PK | H0(POP1) | 61 | Xu-you 1, Jiangxi, CN | H5(POP2) | 82 | Zhong-shuang 9, Hubei, CN | H0(POP2) |
| 20 | Narowal, PK | H0(POP1) | 41 | Batgram, PK | H3(POP1) | 62 | IOC 106, Henang, CN | H0(POP2) | 83 | Xin-yang 7833, Henan, CN | H3(POP2) |
| 21 | Okara, PK | H3(POP1) | 42 | Swat, PK | H3(POP1) | 63 | IOC 5708A, Hunang, CN | H3(POP2) |
A.N, accession number
Fig 1Seed coat color and total seed FA content of 83 genotypes of B. napus L.
(A) Shows the normal distribution and QQ plot configuration of the CIRG, whereas, (B) shows the normal distribution and QQ plot configuration of seed total FA, respectively.
Correlations among tristimulus parameters for seed coat color and the FA contents and compositions in B. napusL.
| Kendall’s tau b | CIRG | L* | a* | b* | C | Ho |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.17 | 0.15 | . | . | 0.17 | . | |
| -0.15 | . | . | 0.16 | 0.18 | . | |
| -0.16 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.18 | . | |
| . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| . | . | . | . | . | . | |
| -0.17 | 0.17 | . | . | . | . |
*, significant at P<0.05;., non-significant; CIRG, Color Index for Red Grapes; Letters L*, a*, b* and C indicate the tristimulus parameters for the seed coat color. L*, lightness; a*, redness-greenness (positive = red); b*, yellowness-blueness (positive = yellow); Ho, hue angle.
Fig 2Correlation analysis between the CIRG or L and the total fatty acids (values for total FA are represented as μg mg-1).
Fig 3(A) Evaluation of population structure of 83 B. napus accessions based on 84 SSR markers. (B) The related estimation of K subpopulation.
The accessions are represented by bars which could be divided into two categories based on their colors. X-axis indicates the number of accessions and Y-axis shows the percentage of group membership.
Calibrated background in 83 genotypes of B. napus using 84 pairs of SSR markers.
| K | Variance | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | -10807 | 277.14 |
| 2 | -10523.7 | 897.26 |
| 3 | -19155.8 | 18216.28 |
| 4 | -17563.4 | 15692.08 |
| 5 | -28450.3 | 37120.38 |
| 6 | -25902.1 | 32443.98 |
| 7 | -22243.5 | 25538.26 |
| 8 | -73196.6 | 127283.8 |
| 9 | -38271.2 | 57070.98 |
| 10 | -64016.7 | 109031 |
Ln p(D), a natural logarithm of the probability of the data that determines the value K, whereas, K is the index showing the number of subpopulations suitable for association analysis.
Comparison of the seed coat color and fatty acid between two subpopulations of B. napus.
| CIRG | L* | a* | b* | C | Ho | C18:0 | C18:1 | C18:2 | C18:3 | C20:0 | C20:1 | C22:0 | C22:1 | C24:0 | TotalFA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 9.87 | 15.78 | 2.75 | 1.77 | 3.53 | 0.49 | 4.87 | 106.8 | 52.33 | 26.6 | 2.64 | 41.36 | 1.73 | 96.99 | 0.86 | 346.65 | |
| CV(%) | 19.66 | 30.36 | 46.88 | 112.1 | 58.91 | 60.45 | 21.29 | 39.77 | 16.44 | 17.68 | 22.3 | 38.37 | 40.13 | 49.7 | 70.77 | 13.16 | |
| Mean | 9.43 | 16.1 | 3.14 | 1.73 | 3.74 | 0.47 | 5.23 | 122.1 | 57.27 | 30.87 | 2.22 | 22.05 | 1.72 | 87.5 | 0.78 | 342.31 | |
| CV(%) | 20.56 | 16.79 | 49.26 | 77.99 | 48.04 | 57.17 | 51.01 | 75.8 | 33.98 | 14.48 | 22.51 | 66.78 | 41.61 | 80.94 | 40.52 | 16.1 |
Letters L*, a*, b* and C indicate the tristimulus parameters for the seed coat color. L*, lightness; a*, redness; b*, yellowness; C, chroma value indicates color intensity or saturation; Ho, hue angle; POP1, population 1; POP2, population 2.
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detected among 83 genotypes of B. napus on BnaC.TT2.a gene locus.
| GeneBank ID | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 166 | 188 | 222 | 226 | 738 | 790 | ||
| A | A | A | C | T | T | DQ778645.1 | |
| · | · | · | · | · | G | ||
| T | · | · | · | · | · | ||
| T | G | C | T | · | · | ||
| T | G | C | T | · | G | ||
| T | G | C | T | · | |||
| T | G | C | T | G | |||
H, Haplotype; Indel, insertion and/or deletion
Fig 4Comparison among different haplotypes of B. napus on the basis of; (A) tritimulus parameters of seed coat color and (B) seed fatty acids content.
Fig 5Linkage disequilibrium of 83 B. napus genotypes obtained on the basis seed color traits, seed fatty acids and single nucleotide polymorphism at BnaC.TT2.a gene locus.
Fig 6Comparison between two subgroups of hyplotypes based on significant association of SNPs to the seed coat color and/or FA traits.
G1, represents H0, H1, and H2, whereas, G2 represents H3, H4, H5 and H6.
DNA Polymorphism (SNPs and/or Indels) at BnaC.TT2.a gene locus and their association with seed coat color and FA content and composition among 83 B. napus genotypes.
“#” represents the position need to be checked.
| Gene | Position | Polymorphisms | Location | Trait | 2010–2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | R2 | ||||||
| 166 | T/A | Intron | C18:1 | 14.43 | 2.80E-04 | 0.1512 | |
| C18:2 | 4.51 | 3.68E-02 | 0.0527 | ||||
| C22:0 | 13.38 | 4.50E-04 | 0.1417 | ||||
| C22:1 | 6.18 | 1.50E-02 | 0.0709 | ||||
| TotalFA | 4.72 | 3.27E-02 | 0.0551 | ||||
| 188 | G/A | Intron | C18:1 | 25.31 | 0.00E+00 | 0.2381 | |
| C18:2 | 14.98 | 2.20E-04 | 0.1561 | ||||
| C22:0 | 5.15 | 2.59E-02 | 0.0598 | ||||
| C22:1 | 14.52 | 2.70E-04 | 0.152 | ||||
| TotalFA | 7.54 | 7.40E-03 | 0.0852 | ||||
| 222 | C/A | Intron | C18:1 | 25.31 | 0.00E+00 | 0.2381 | |
| C18:2 | 14.98 | 2.20E-04 | 0.1561 | ||||
| C22:0 | 5.15 | 2.59E-02 | 0.0598 | ||||
| C22:1 | 14.52 | 2.70E-04 | 0.152 | ||||
| TotalFA | 7.54 | 7.40E-03 | 0.0852 | ||||
| 226 | T/C | Intron | C18:1 | 25.31 | 0.00E+00 | 0.2381 | |
| C18:2 | 14.98 | 2.20E-04 | 0.1561 | ||||
| C22:0 | 5.15 | 2.59E-02 | 0.0598 | ||||
| C22:1 | 14.52 | 2.70E-04 | 0.152 | ||||
| TotalFA | 7.54 | 7.40E-03 | 0.0852 | ||||
| 738 | Indel | Exon | a* | 3.93 | 2.35E-02 | 0.0895 | |
| C18:2 | 3.33 | 4.07E-02 | 0.0769 | ||||
| Total_FA | 4.18 | 1.88E-02 | 0.0946 | ||||
| 790# | T/G | Exon | b* | 6.41 | 2.60E-03 | 0.138 | |
| L* | 6.35 | 2.80E-03 | 0.137 | ||||
| Ho | 5.75 | 4.60E-03 | 0.1257 | ||||
| CIRG | 5.21 | 7.50E-03 | 0.1153 | ||||
| C18:2 | 3.26 | 4.35E-02 | 0.0754 | ||||