Jessica Weafer1, David A Gallo2, Harriet de Wit1. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Acute doses of alcohol impair memory when administered before encoding of emotionally neutral stimuli but enhance memory when administered immediately after encoding, potentially by affecting memory consolidation. Here, we examined whether alcohol produces similar biphasic effects on memory for positive or negative emotional stimuli. METHOD: The current study examined memory for emotional stimuli after alcohol (0.8 g/kg) was administered either before stimulus viewing (encoding group; n = 20) or immediately following stimulus viewing (consolidation group; n = 20). A third group received placebo both before and after stimulus viewing (control group; n = 19). Participants viewed the stimuli on one day, and their retrieval was assessed exactly 48 hours later, when they performed a surprise cued recollection and recognition test of the stimuli in a drug-free state. RESULTS: As in previous studies, alcohol administered before encoding impaired memory accuracy, whereas alcohol administered after encoding enhanced memory accuracy. Critically, alcohol effects on cued recollection depended on the valence of the emotional stimuli: Its memory-impairing effects during encoding were greatest for emotional stimuli, whereas its memory-enhancing effects during consolidation were greatest for emotionally neutral stimuli. Effects of alcohol on recognition were not related to stimulus valence. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends previous findings with memory for neutral stimuli, showing that alcohol differentially affects the encoding and consolidation of memory for emotional stimuli. These effects of alcohol on memory for emotionally salient material may contribute to the development of alcohol-related problems, perhaps by dampening memory for adverse consequences of alcohol consumption.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Acute doses of alcohol impair memory when administered before encoding of emotionally neutral stimuli but enhance memory when administered immediately after encoding, potentially by affecting memory consolidation. Here, we examined whether alcohol produces similar biphasic effects on memory for positive or negative emotional stimuli. METHOD: The current study examined memory for emotional stimuli after alcohol (0.8 g/kg) was administered either before stimulus viewing (encoding group; n = 20) or immediately following stimulus viewing (consolidation group; n = 20). A third group received placebo both before and after stimulus viewing (control group; n = 19). Participants viewed the stimuli on one day, and their retrieval was assessed exactly 48 hours later, when they performed a surprise cued recollection and recognition test of the stimuli in a drug-free state. RESULTS: As in previous studies, alcohol administered before encoding impaired memory accuracy, whereas alcohol administered after encoding enhanced memory accuracy. Critically, alcohol effects on cued recollection depended on the valence of the emotional stimuli: Its memory-impairing effects during encoding were greatest for emotional stimuli, whereas its memory-enhancing effects during consolidation were greatest for emotionally neutral stimuli. Effects of alcohol on recognition were not related to stimulus valence. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends previous findings with memory for neutral stimuli, showing that alcohol differentially affects the encoding and consolidation of memory for emotional stimuli. These effects of alcohol on memory for emotionally salient material may contribute to the development of alcohol-related problems, perhaps by dampening memory for adverse consequences of alcohol consumption.
Authors: E S Parker; I M Birnbaum; H Weingartner; J T Hartley; R C Stillman; R J Wyatt Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1980 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: E S Parker; J M Morihisa; R J Wyatt; B L Schwartz; H Weingartner; R C Stillman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 1981 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Thomas G Brown; Marie Claude Ouimet; Manal Eldeb; Jacques Tremblay; Evelyn Vingilis; Louise Nadeau; Jens Pruessner; Antoine Bechara Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Julie Gawrylowicz; Anne M Ridley; Ian P Albery; Edit Barnoth; Jack Young Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-02-19 Impact factor: 4.530