Literature DB >> 26751276

Evaluating Digital PCR for the Quantification of Human Genomic DNA: Accessible Amplifiable Targets.

Margaret C Kline1, Erica L Romsos1, David L Duewer1.   

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) multiplexed assays perform best when the input quantity of template DNA is controlled to within about a factor of √2. To help ensure that PCR assays yield consistent results over time and place, results from methods used to determine DNA quantity need to be metrologically traceable to a common reference. Many DNA quantitation systems can be accurately calibrated with solutions of DNA in aqueous buffer. Since they do not require external calibration, end-point limiting dilution technologies, collectively termed "digital PCR (dPCR)", have been proposed as suitable for value assigning such DNA calibrants. The performance characteristics of several commercially available dPCR systems have recently been documented using plasmid, viral, or fragmented genomic DNA; dPCR performance with more complex materials, such as human genomic DNA, has been less studied. With the goal of providing a human genomic reference material traceably certified for mass concentration, we are investigating the measurement characteristics of several dPCR systems. We here report results of measurements from multiple PCR assays, on four human genomic DNAs treated with four endonuclease restriction enzymes using both chamber and droplet dPCR platforms. We conclude that dPCR does not estimate the absolute number of PCR targets in a given volume but rather the number of accessible and amplifiable targets. While enzymatic restriction of human genomic DNA increases accessibility for some assays, in well-optimized PCR assays it can reduce the number of amplifiable targets and increase assay variability relative to uncut sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26751276      PMCID: PMC5108050          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  12 in total

1.  Digital PCR.

Authors:  B Vogelstein; K W Kinzler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  NIST Mixed Stain Study 3: DNA quantitation accuracy and its influence on short tandem repeat multiplex signal intensity.

Authors:  Margaret C Kline; David L Duewer; Janette W Redman; John M Butler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  ddpcRquant: threshold determination for single channel droplet digital PCR experiments.

Authors:  Wim Trypsteen; Matthijs Vynck; Jan De Neve; Pawel Bonczkowski; Maja Kiselinova; Eva Malatinkova; Karen Vervisch; Olivier Thas; Linos Vandekerckhove; Ward De Spiegelaere
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.

Authors:  S A Miller; D D Dykes; H F Polesky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Digital polymerase chain reaction measured pUC19 marker as calibrant for HPLC measurement of DNA quantity.

Authors:  Daniel G Burke; Lianhua Dong; Somanath Bhat; Michael Forbes-Smith; Shuang Fu; Leonardo Pinheiro; Wang Jing; Kerry R Emslie
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Real-time cdPCR opens a window into events occurring in the first few PCR amplification cycles.

Authors:  David L Duewer; Margaret C Kline; Erica L Romsos
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Guide to the use of type II restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  R Fuchs; R Blakesley
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 8.  The evaluation of limiting dilution assays.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  1982-03-12       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution.

Authors:  P J Sykes; S H Neoh; M J Brisco; E Hughes; J Condon; A A Morley
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 1.993

10.  Production and certification of NIST Standard Reference Material 2372 Human DNA Quantitation Standard.

Authors:  Margaret C Kline; David L Duewer; John C Travis; Melody V Smith; Janette W Redman; Peter M Vallone; Amy E Decker; John M Butler
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-04-18       Impact factor: 4.142

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluating digital PCR for the quantification of human nuclear DNA: determining target strandedness.

Authors:  Margaret C Kline; David L Duewer
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Limitations of methods for measuring the concentration of human genomic DNA and oligonucleotide samples.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Erica V Stein; Paul DeRose; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.993

3.  Evaluating droplet digital PCR for the quantification of human genomic DNA: converting copies per nanoliter to nanograms nuclear DNA per microliter.

Authors:  David L Duewer; Margaret C Kline; Erica L Romsos; Blaza Toman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Droplet volume variability as a critical factor for accuracy of absolute quantification using droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Alexandra Bogožalec Košir; Carla Divieto; Jernej Pavšič; Stefano Pavarelli; David Dobnik; Tanja Dreo; Roberto Bellotti; Maria Paola Sassi; Jana Žel
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 4.142

5.  Steps to achieve quantitative measurements of microRNA using two step droplet digital PCR.

Authors:  Erica V Stein; David L Duewer; Natalia Farkas; Erica L Romsos; Lili Wang; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A novel high-throughput molecular counting method with single base-pair resolution enables accurate single-gene NIPT.

Authors:  David S Tsao; Sukrit Silas; Brian P Landry; Nelda P Itzep; Amy B Nguyen; Samuel Greenberg; Celeste K Kanne; Vivien A Sheehan; Rani Sharma; Rahul Shukla; Prem N Arora; Oguzhan Atay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Development and interlaboratory evaluation of a NIST Reference Material RM 8366 for EGFR and MET gene copy number measurements.

Authors:  Hua-Jun He; Biswajit Das; Megan H Cleveland; Li Chen; Corinne E Camalier; Liang-Chun Liu; Kara L Norman; Andrew P Fellowes; Christopher R McEvoy; Steve P Lund; Jamie Almeida; Carolyn R Steffen; Chris Karlovich; P Mickey Williams; Kenneth D Cole
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Expression of GM content in mass fraction from digital PCR data.

Authors:  Philippe Corbisier; Gerhard Buttinger; Cristian Savini; Maria Grazia Sacco; Francesco Gatto; Hendrik Emons
Journal:  Food Control       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 5.548

9.  Digital PCR for the Analysis of MYC Copy Number Variation in Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Brik; Daniel G Weber; Swaantje Casjens; Peter Rozynek; Swetlana Meier; Thomas Behrens; Georgios Stamatis; Kaid Darwiche; Dirk Theegarten; Thomas Brüning; Georg Johnen
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.434

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.