Literature DB >> 26750803

Can particle beam therapy be improved using helium ions? - a planning study focusing on pediatric patients.

Barbara Knäusl1,2, Hermann Fuchs1,2, Karin Dieckmann1,2, Dietmar Georg1,2.   

Abstract

Aim To explore the potential of scanned helium ion beam therapy ((4)He) compared to proton therapy in a comparative planning study focusing on pediatric patients. This was motivated by the superior biological and physical characteristics of (4)He. Material and methods For eleven neuroblastoma (NB), nine Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), five Wilms tumor (WT), five ependymoma (EP) and four Ewing sarcoma (EW) patients, treatment plans were created for protons and (4)He. Dose prescription to the planning target volume (PTV) was 21 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] (NB), 19.8 Gy (RBE) (HL), 25.2 Gy (RBE) for the WT boost volume and 54 Gy (RBE) for EP and EW patients. A pencil beam algorithm for protons (constant RBE = 1.1) and (4)He was implemented in the treatment planning system Hyperion. For (4)He the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was calculated with a 'zonal' model based on different linear energy transfer regions. Results Target constraints were fulfilled for all indications. For NB patients differences for kidneys and liver were observed for all dose-volume areas, except the high-dose volume. The body volume receiving up to 12.6 Gy (RBE) was reduced by up to 10% with (4)He. For WT patients the mean and high-dose volume for the liver was improved when using (4)He. For EP normal tissue dose was reduced using (4)He with 12.7% of the voxels receiving higher doses using protons. For HL and EW sarcoma patients the combination of large PTV volumes with the position of the organs at risk (OARs) obliterated the differences between the two particle species, while patients with the heart close to the PTV could benefit from (4)He. Conclusion Treatment plan quality improved with (4)He compared to proton plans, but advantages in OAR sparing were depending on indication and tumor geometries. These first results of scanned (4)He therapy motivate comprehensive research on (4)He, including acquisition of experimental data to improve modeling of (4)He.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26750803     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1125016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  8 in total

Review 1.  Charged-particle therapy in cancer: clinical uses and future perspectives.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Roberto Orecchia; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy.

Authors:  Lukas Schaub; Semi Ben Harrabi; Juergen Debus
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

4.  Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Thomas Tessonnier; Andrea Mairani; Wenjing Chen; Paola Sala; Francesco Cerutti; Alfredo Ferrari; Thomas Haberer; Jürgen Debus; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Mapping the Relative Biological Effectiveness of Proton, Helium and Carbon Ions with High-Throughput Techniques.

Authors:  Lawrence Bronk; Fada Guan; Darshana Patel; Duo Ma; Benjamin Kroger; Xiaochun Wang; Kevin Tran; Joycelyn Yiu; Clifford Stephan; Jürgen Debus; Amir Abdollahi; Oliver Jäkel; Radhe Mohan; Uwe Titt; David R Grosshans
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Characterization of the Mixed Radiation Field Produced by Carbon and Oxygen Ion Beams of Therapeutic Energy: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.

Authors:  C K Ying; David Bolst; Anatoly Rosenfeld; Susanna Guatelli
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-11

Review 7.  Proton therapy in the most common pediatric non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview of clinical and dosimetric outcomes.

Authors:  Angela Sardaro; Roberta Carbonara; Maria Fonte Petruzzelli; Barbara Turi; Marco Moschetta; Arnaldo Scardapane; Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.638

8.  We are ready for clinical implementation of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the United States.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; Richard A Amos; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.243

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.