Literature DB >> 26750497

Current evidence for the diagnostic value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for liver metastasis.

Masakatsu Tsurusaki1, Keitaro Sofue1, Takamichi Murakami1.   

Abstract

A variety of imaging techniques, including ultrasonography (US), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography combined with CT scan (PET/CT), are available for diagnosis and treatment planning in liver metastasis. Contrast-enhanced MDCT is a relatively non-invasive, widely available and standardized method for hepatic work-up. Gadoxetic acid (gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid; EOB Primovist®]) is a recently developed liver-specific hepatobiliary MR contrast agent that offers both dynamic imaging as well as liver-specific static hepatocyte imaging, referred to as the hepatobiliary phase. Following contrast injection, this technique reveals dynamic vascular phases (arterial, portal venous and delayed phases), in addition to the hepatobiliary phase upon uptake by functional hepatocytes. The overall sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was significantly higher than that of contrast-enhanced CT. Specifically, the higher sensitivity of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI was observed in lesions smaller than 1 cm in diameter. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is considered an extremely useful tool for the diagnosis of liver metastases. Future studies will focus on diagnostic algorithms involving combinations of modalities such as MRI, MDCT and/or (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, which may impact the treatment plan for these patients.
© 2016 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal carcinoma; diagnosis; gadoxetic acid; liver metastasis; magnetic resonance imaging

Year:  2016        PMID: 26750497     DOI: 10.1111/hepr.12646

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatol Res        ISSN: 1386-6346            Impact factor:   4.288


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Importance of FDG-PET/computed tomography in colorectal cancer].

Authors:  S Kleiner; W Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Clinical impact of preoperative liver MRI in the evaluation of synchronous liver metastasis of colon cancer.

Authors:  Cherry Kim; So Yeon Kim; Min-Ju Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; Chan Wook Kim; Jae Hoon Lee; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Seong Ho Park; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Treatment outcomes of hepatectomy for liver metastases of gastric cancer diagnosed using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Taichi Tatsubayashi; Yutaka Tanizawa; Yuichiro Miki; Masanori Tokunaga; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Teiichi Sugiura; Yusuke Kinugasa; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Utility of PET Scans in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastrointestinal Tumors.

Authors:  Nandakumar Menon; Mark Mandelkern
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Peritoneal and pleural fluids may appear hyperintense on hepatobiliary phase using hepatobiliary MR contrast agents.

Authors:  Maria Ciolina; Michele Di Martino; Onorina Bruno; Romain Pommier; Valérie Vilgrain; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Automatized Hepatic Tumor Volume Analysis of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases by Gd-EOB MRI-A Deep-Learning Model to Support Multidisciplinary Cancer Conference Decision-Making.

Authors:  Uli Fehrenbach; Siyi Xin; Alexander Hartenstein; Timo Alexander Auer; Franziska Dräger; Konrad Froböse; Henning Jann; Martina Mogl; Holger Amthauer; Dominik Geisel; Timm Denecke; Bertram Wiedenmann; Tobias Penzkofer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Deep Learning-based CT Image Reconstruction: Initial Evaluation Targeting Hypovascular Hepatic Metastases.

Authors:  Yuko Nakamura; Toru Higaki; Fuminari Tatsugami; Jian Zhou; Zhou Yu; Naruomi Akino; Yuya Ito; Makoto Iida; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-10-09

Review 8.  Present and future roles of FDG-PET/CT imaging in the management of gastrointestinal cancer: an update.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Masatoyo Nakajo; Hayato Kaida; Ryogo Minamimoto; Kenji Hirata; Masakatsu Tsurusaki; Hiroshi Doi; Yoshiko Ueno; Keitaro Sofue; Yukihisa Tamaki; Koichiro Yamakado
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.131

Review 9.  Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Strobel; John Neoptolemos; Dirk Jäger; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Efficacy comparison of multi-phase CT and hepatotropic contrast-enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Tomasz K Nowicki; Karolina Markiet; Ewa Izycka-Swieszewska; Katarzyna Dziadziuszko; Michal Studniarek; Edyta Szurowska
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.