Cherry Kim1,2, So Yeon Kim3, Min-Ju Kim4, Yong Sik Yoon5, Chan Wook Kim5, Jae Hoon Lee5, Kyu-Pyo Kim6, Seung Soo Lee1, Seong Ho Park1, Moon-Gyu Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 516, Gojan 1-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, 15355, Gyeonggi, Korea. 3. Department of Radiology and the Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. sykim.radiology@gmail.com. 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 5. Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea. 6. Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether additional MRI including gadoxetic acid enhancement is associated with survival rate (SR) in patients with synchronous liver metastasis of colon cancer (sCLM), compared with patients assessed only with CT. METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent only CT (CT group) and 65 underwent additional MRI (CT+MRI group) for preoperative work-up of sCLM. In the CT+MRI group, the discrepancy between CT and MRI was analyzed. The 5-year SR was compared between the groups, and affecting factors were investigated. The inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (IPTW) adjusted by propensity scores was performed. RESULTS: In the CT+MRI group, 44 (67.7%) showed a discrepancy in the number of sCLMs between CT and MRI. MRI detected 39 additional sCLMs initially missed on CT in 26 patients. The number of detected sCLMs was better correlated with the pathologic findings in the CT+MRI group than in the CT group (p = 0.008). The estimated 5-year SR in the CT+MRI group was 70.8%, while that in the CT group was 48.1%. On adjusted multivariate analyses after the IPTW, the CT+MRI group showed a significantly lower risk of overall mortality than the CT group. CONCLUSION: Additional preoperative evaluation by MRI allowed us to more precisely detect sCLM and was associated with a better SR. KEY POINTS: • CT+MRI group showed significantly higher 5-year survival rates than CT group. • CT+MRI group was an independent prognostic factor of overall mortality. • MRI facilitates more accurate detection and better lesion characterization. • MRI selected better candidates for curative treatment. • The benefits of MRI were reflected by better survival.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether additional MRI including gadoxetic acid enhancement is associated with survival rate (SR) in patients with synchronous liver metastasis of colon cancer (sCLM), compared with patients assessed only with CT. METHODS: Fifty-two patients underwent only CT (CT group) and 65 underwent additional MRI (CT+MRI group) for preoperative work-up of sCLM. In the CT+MRI group, the discrepancy between CT and MRI was analyzed. The 5-year SR was compared between the groups, and affecting factors were investigated. The inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (IPTW) adjusted by propensity scores was performed. RESULTS: In the CT+MRI group, 44 (67.7%) showed a discrepancy in the number of sCLMs between CT and MRI. MRI detected 39 additional sCLMs initially missed on CT in 26 patients. The number of detected sCLMs was better correlated with the pathologic findings in the CT+MRI group than in the CT group (p = 0.008). The estimated 5-year SR in the CT+MRI group was 70.8%, while that in the CT group was 48.1%. On adjusted multivariate analyses after the IPTW, the CT+MRI group showed a significantly lower risk of overall mortality than the CT group. CONCLUSION: Additional preoperative evaluation by MRI allowed us to more precisely detect sCLM and was associated with a better SR. KEY POINTS: • CT+MRI group showed significantly higher 5-year survival rates than CT group. • CT+MRI group was an independent prognostic factor of overall mortality. • MRI facilitates more accurate detection and better lesion characterization. • MRI selected better candidates for curative treatment. • The benefits of MRI were reflected by better survival.
Authors: S Iwatsuki; I Dvorchik; J R Madariaga; J W Marsh; F Dodson; A C Bonham; D A Geller; T J Gayowski; J J Fung; T E Starzl Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Shandra Bipat; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Emile F I Comans; Milan E J Pijl; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Jaap Stoker Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-08-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hye Jin Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Jae Ho Byun; Jin Cheon Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Seong Ho Park; Ah Young Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ajith K Siriwardena; James M Mason; Saifee Mullamitha; Helen C Hancock; Santhalingam Jegatheeswaran Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: C J Zech; P Korpraphong; A Huppertz; T Denecke; M J Kim; W Tanomkiat; E Jonas; A Ba-Ssalamah Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 6.939