Literature DB >> 26750321

The Method of Sorting as a Data-Gathering Procedure in Multivariate Research.

S Rosenberg, M Park Kim.   

Abstract

This study compares two basic variants of the sorting method: single-sort in which each respondent is given only one opportunity to sort the items; and multiple-sort in which the respondent is given several opportunities to sort, each time on a different basis. Kinship terms serve as stimulus materials. Multidimensional scaling solutions show large differences between the two methods with respect to the degree to which the kinship dimensions are used as a basis for sorting. In particular, most respondents ignore the most obvious dimension (sex of the terms) when they believe they have only one opportunity to indicate the dimensions in the set. Similar observations of pairwise judgments in another stimulus domain (consonant phonemes) suggest the same bias may be present in such judgments. Moreover, in both instances hierarchical clustering completely fails to represent the minority of judges who do not ignore the given dimension. These results indicate that a multiple set of judgments from each set of respondents may be superior to a single set of judgments for certain stimulus domains. Finally, the kinship data also indicate that male and female respondents emphasize different kinship dimensions but that aggregated multiple-sort data do appear to reflect the cognitive dimensions present in any given individual.

Year:  1975        PMID: 26750321     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1004_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  23 in total

1.  Extending the ALCOVE model of category learning to featural stimulus domains.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Daniel J Navarro
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

2.  Adverse Effects of Electronic Cigarette Use: A Concept Mapping Approach.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Aashir Nasim; Scott Rosas
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Common and distinctive features in stimulus similarity: a modified version of the contrast model.

Authors:  Daniel J Navarro; Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

4.  Sharing personal health record data elements in protective custody: youth and stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Judith W Dexheimer; Mary V Greiner; Sarah J Beal; Darius Johnson; Andrea Kachelmeyer; Lisa M Vaughn
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Creating neighbourhood groupings based on built environment features to facilitate health promotion activities.

Authors:  Donald Schopflocher; Eric VanSpronsen; John C Spence; Helen Vallianatos; Kim D Raine; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Candace I J Nykiforuk
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2012-07-26

6.  User identified positive outcome expectancies of electronic cigarette use: A concept mapping study.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Sarah F Maloney; Mignonne C Guy; Thomas Eissenberg; Pebbles Fagan
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2017-03-09

7.  A new zero-inflated negative binomial methodology for latent category identification.

Authors:  Simon J Blanchard; Wayne S DeSarbo
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Mapping a research agenda for the science of team science.

Authors:  Holly J Falk-Krzesinski; Noshir Contractor; Stephen M Fiore; Kara L Hall; Cathleen Kane; Joann Keyton; Julie Thompson Klein; Bonnie Spring; Daniel Stokols; William Trochim
Journal:  Res Eval       Date:  2011-06-01

9.  Reasons for using flavored liquids among electronic cigarette users: A concept mapping study.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Alexa A Lopez; Mignonne C Guy; Caroline O Cobb
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  Implementing evidence-based practice in community mental health agencies: a multiple stakeholder analysis.

Authors:  Gregory A Aarons; Rebecca S Wells; Karen Zagursky; Danielle L Fettes; Lawrence A Palinkas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.