Eric K Soule1, Aashir Nasim2, Scott Rosas3. 1. Department of Psychology and Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; eksoule@vcu.edu. 2. Department of African American Studies, Department of Psychology and Center for the Study of Tobacco Products, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA; 3. Department of Research, Concept Systems, Incorporated, Ithaca, NY.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has grown rapidly in popularity within a short period of time. As ECIG products continue to evolve and more individuals begin using ECIGs, it is important to understand the potential adverse effects that are associated with ECIG use. The purpose of this study was to examine and describe the acute adverse effects associated with ECIG use. METHODS: This study used an integrated, mixed-method participatory approach called concept mapping (CM). Experienced ECIG users (n = 85) provided statements that answered the focus prompt "A specific negative or unpleasant effect (ie, physical or psychological) that I have experienced either during or immediately after using an electronic cigarette device is…" in an online program. Participants sorted these statements into piles of common themes and rated each statement. Using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, a concept map of the adverse effects statements was created. RESULTS: Participants generated 79 statements that completed the focus prompt and were retained by researchers. Analysis generated a map containing five clusters that characterized perceived adverse effects of ECIG use: Stigma, Worry/Guilt, Addiction Signs, Physical Effects, and Device/Vapor Problems. CONCLUSIONS: ECIG use is associated with adverse effects that should be monitored as ECIGs continue to grow in popularity. If ECIGs are to be regulated, policies should be created that minimize the likelihood of user identified adverse effects. IMPLICATIONS: This article provides a list of adverse effects reported by experienced ECIG users. This article organizes these effects into a conceptual model that may be useful for better understanding the adverse outcomes associated with ECIG use. These identified adverse effects may be useful for health professionals and policy makers. Health professionals should be aware of potential negative health effects that may be associated with ECIG use and policy makers could design ECIG regulations that minimize the risk of the adverse effects reported by ECIG users in this study.
INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (ECIG) use has grown rapidly in popularity within a short period of time. As ECIG products continue to evolve and more individuals begin using ECIGs, it is important to understand the potential adverse effects that are associated with ECIG use. The purpose of this study was to examine and describe the acute adverse effects associated with ECIG use. METHODS: This study used an integrated, mixed-method participatory approach called concept mapping (CM). Experienced ECIG users (n = 85) provided statements that answered the focus prompt "A specific negative or unpleasant effect (ie, physical or psychological) that I have experienced either during or immediately after using an electronic cigarette device is…" in an online program. Participants sorted these statements into piles of common themes and rated each statement. Using multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, a concept map of the adverse effects statements was created. RESULTS:Participants generated 79 statements that completed the focus prompt and were retained by researchers. Analysis generated a map containing five clusters that characterized perceived adverse effects of ECIG use: Stigma, Worry/Guilt, Addiction Signs, Physical Effects, and Device/Vapor Problems. CONCLUSIONS: ECIG use is associated with adverse effects that should be monitored as ECIGs continue to grow in popularity. If ECIGs are to be regulated, policies should be created that minimize the likelihood of user identified adverse effects. IMPLICATIONS: This article provides a list of adverse effects reported by experienced ECIG users. This article organizes these effects into a conceptual model that may be useful for better understanding the adverse outcomes associated with ECIG use. These identified adverse effects may be useful for health professionals and policy makers. Health professionals should be aware of potential negative health effects that may be associated with ECIG use and policy makers could design ECIG regulations that minimize the risk of the adverse effects reported by ECIG users in this study.
Authors: Wasim Maziak; Samer Rastam; Iman Ibrahim; Kenneth D Ward; Alan Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Melissa D Blank; Caroline O Cobb; Barbara Kilgalen; Janet Austin; Michael F Weaver; Alan Shihadeh; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Thao Nguyen; Duma Hlangothi; Raul A Martinez; Durelle Jacob; Kevin Anthony; Herb Nance; Mahmoud A Saleh Journal: J Environ Sci Health B Date: 2013 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Bridget K Ambrose; Brian L Rostron; Sarah E Johnson; David B Portnoy; Benjamin J Apelberg; Annette R Kaufman; Conrad J Choiniere Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Erin L Sutfin; Thomas P McCoy; Holly E R Morrell; Bettina B Hoeppner; Mark Wolfson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jessica L King; Beth A Reboussin; Julie W Merten; Kimberly D Wiseman; Kimberly G Wagoner; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Laura A Gibson; MeLisa R Creamer; Alison B Breland; Aida Luz Giachello; Annette Kaufman; Grace Kong; Terry F Pechacek; Jessica K Pepper; Eric K Soule; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Allison M Glasser; Lauren Collins; Jennifer L Pearson; Haneen Abudayyeh; Raymond S Niaura; David B Abrams; Andrea C Villanti Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-11-30 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Eric K Soule; Joseph G L Lee; Kathleen L Egan; Kendall M Bode; Abigail C Desrosiers; Mignonne C Guy; Alison Breland; Pebbles Fagan Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jaime E Sidani; Jason B Colditz; Erica L Barrett; Ariel Shensa; Kar-Hai Chu; A Everette James; Brian A Primack Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Alexa A Lopez; Caroline O Cobb; Jessica M Yingst; Susan Veldheer; Shari Hrabovsky; Miao-Shan Yen; Jonathan Foulds; Thomas Eissenberg Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-03-03 Impact factor: 3.295