Literature DB >> 26750171

What researchers think of involving consumers in health research.

Sharon Lawn1.   

Abstract

Involving consumers in research enhances its quality and appropriateness, and is required within many research funding schemes. While the rationale for consumer involvement is understood, its implementation is unclear. The researcher investigated views of a group of Australia's leading researchers (n=38) about the role of consumers in their research using a brief survey administered at the Australia National Health and Medical Research (NHMRC) Translation Conference in 2014. Interpretive content analysis was used for data analysis. Respondents noted the importance of consumer involvement in the planning and design of research, to ensure its relevance to the community as end-users of research outcomes. Therefore, consumers were seen as central to research translation by the respondents. Many respondents perceived empathy for the experiences of others as a fundamental researcher skill. Despite strong acknowledgement of the benefits of consumer involvement in research, gaps exist between the rhetoric and practice of consumer involvement beyond consultative roles. Power over decisions made about research processes and ownership of research are continuing barriers to greater consumer involvement in research. Structural changes to how research is funded, evaluated and reported provide a means of addressing these gaps. NHMRC leadership is needed to promote these changes.

Year:  2016        PMID: 26750171     DOI: 10.1071/PY15089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Prim Health        ISSN: 1448-7527            Impact factor:   1.307


  6 in total

1.  Embedding consumer and community involvement within an established research centre: moving from general recommendations to an actionable framework.

Authors:  Tilini Gunatillake; Cade Shadbolt; Daniel Gould; Michelle Lam; Marion Glanville Hearst; Carol Vleeskens; Peter Choong; Michelle Dowsey
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Interaction and innovation: practical strategies for inclusive consumer-driven research in health services.

Authors:  Maria R Dahm; Anthony Brown; Dean Martin; Maureen Williams; Brian Osborne; Jocelyne Basseal; Mary Potter; Rae-Anne Hardie; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Andrew Georgiou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Development of a Lived Experience-Based Digital Resource for a Digitally-Assisted Peer Support Program for Young People Experiencing Psychosis.

Authors:  Claire E Peck; Michelle H Lim; Melanie Purkiss; Fiona Foley; Liza Hopkins; Neil Thomas
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations.

Authors:  Anne McKenzie; Janelle Bowden; John R Zalcberg; Karena Conroy; Julia Fallon-Ferguson; Shilpanjali Jesudason; James Ansell; Ania Anderst; Nicola Straiton
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2022-02-05

5.  Examining the use of metaphors to understand the experience of community treatment orders for patients and mental health workers.

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Toni Delany; Mariastella Pulvirenti; Ann Smith; John McMillan
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 6.  An integrative review of e-learning in the delivery of self-management support training for health professionals.

Authors:  Sharon Lawn; Xiaojuan Zhi; Andrea Morello
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.