Literature DB >> 26749180

Emotion and hypervigilance: negative affect predicts increased P1 responses to non-negative pictorial stimuli.

Jessica Schomberg1, Benjamin Schöne2, Thomas Gruber2, Markus Quirin2.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that negative affect influences attentional processes. Here, we investigate whether pre-experimental negative affect predicts a hypervigilant neural response as indicated by increased event-related potential amplitudes in response to neutral and positive visual stimuli. In our study, seventeen male participants filled out the German version of the positive and negative affect schedule (Watson et al. in J Pers Soc Psychol 54:1063-1070, 1988; Krohne et al. in Diagnostica 42:139-156, 1996) and subsequently watched positive (erotica, extreme sports, beautiful women) and neutral (daily activities) photographs while electroencephalogram was recorded. In line with our hypothesis, low state negative affect but not (reduced) positive affect predicted an increase in the first positive event-related potential amplitude P1 as a typical marker of increased selective attention. As this effect occurred in response to non-threatening picture conditions, negative affect may foster an individual's general hypervigilance, a state that has formerly been associated with psychopathology only.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Event-related potentials; Hypervigilance; Negative affect; P1 amplitude; Selective attention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26749180     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4544-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Event-related potential studies of attention.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.

Authors:  J A EASTERBROOK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1959-05       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Electrocortical evidence for vigilance-avoidance in Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Anna Weinberg; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection.

Authors:  G Rowe; J B Hirsh; A K Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings.

Authors:  Jonas K Olofsson; Steven Nordin; Henrique Sequeira; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 3.251

6.  The effect of fear on attentional processing in a sample of healthy females.

Authors:  Anne M Finucane; Mick J Power
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2010-01

7.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Brain dynamics of visual attention during anticipation and encoding of threat- and safe-cues in spider-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Jaroslaw M Michalowski; Christiane A Pané-Farré; Andreas Löw; Alfons O Hamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control.

Authors:  Douglas Derryberry; Marjorie A Reed
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-05

10.  Being bad isn't always good: affective context moderates the attention bias toward negative information.

Authors:  N Kyle Smith; Jeff T Larsen; Tanya L Chartrand; John T Cacioppo; Heather A Katafiasz; Kathleen E Moran
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2006-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Interactions of emotion and anxiety on visual working memory performance.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Hannah M Curtis; Nazanin Derakshan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.