Literature DB >> 16536647

Being bad isn't always good: affective context moderates the attention bias toward negative information.

N Kyle Smith1, Jeff T Larsen, Tanya L Chartrand, John T Cacioppo, Heather A Katafiasz, Kathleen E Moran.   

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that people automatically devote more attention to negative information than to positive information. The authors conducted 3 experiments to test whether this bias is attenuated by a person's affective context. Specifically, the authors primed participants with positive and negative information using traditional (e.g., subliminal semantic priming) and nontraditional (e.g., social interactions) means and measured the amount of attention they allocated to positive and negative information. With both event-related brain potentials (Experiment 1) and the Stroop task (Experiments 2 and 3), results suggest that the attention bias to negative information is attenuated or eliminated when positive constructs are made accessible. The implications of this result for other biases to negative information and for the self-reinforcing nature of emotional disorders are discussed. Copyright 2006 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16536647     DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  23 in total

Review 1.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Effects of material emotional valence on the time course of massive repetition priming.

Authors:  Zhiguo Hu; Hongyan Liu; John X Zhang
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-06

3.  Examination of affective and cognitive interference in schizophrenia and relation to symptoms.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Martin; Theresa M Becker; David C Cicero; John G Kerns
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2013-08

Review 4.  Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology.

Authors:  Eric L Garland; Barbara Fredrickson; Ann M Kring; David P Johnson; Piper S Meyer; David L Penn
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2010-03-12

5.  The negativity bias predicts response rate to Behavioral Activation for depression.

Authors:  Jackie K Gollan; Denada Hoxha; Kallio Hunnicutt-Ferguson; Catherine J Norris; Laina Rosebrock; Lindsey Sankin; John Cacioppo
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-28

6.  Twice the negativity bias and half the positivity offset: Evaluative responses to emotional information in depression.

Authors:  Jackie K Gollan; Denada Hoxha; Kallio Hunnicutt-Ferguson; Catherine J Norris; Laina Rosebrock; Lindsey Sankin; John Cacioppo
Journal:  J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-26

7.  The negativity bias in affective picture processing depends on top-down and bottom-up motivational significance.

Authors:  Joseph Hilgard; Anna Weinberg; Greg Hajcak Proudfit; Bruce D Bartholow
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2014-05-26

8.  THE POSITIVITY OFFSET THEORY OF ANHEDONIA IN SCHIZOPHRENIA.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Katherine H Frost; Bern G Lee; James M Gold
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03-10

9.  Are preferences in emotional processing affected by distraction? Examining the age-related positivity effect in visual fixation within a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Eric S Allard; Derek M Isaacowitz
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2008-09-26

10.  Emotion and hypervigilance: negative affect predicts increased P1 responses to non-negative pictorial stimuli.

Authors:  Jessica Schomberg; Benjamin Schöne; Thomas Gruber; Markus Quirin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.