Literature DB >> 26748894

Spleen enlargement is a risk factor for thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia: Evaluation on 1,297 patients.

Alessandro Andriani1, Roberto Latagliata2, Barbara Anaclerico3, Antonio Spadea4, Angela Rago5, Ambra Di Veroli6, Francesca Spirito7, Raffaele Porrini8, Marianna De Muro9, Sabrina Crescenzi Leonetti10, Nicoletta Villivà1, Cinzia De Gregoris11, Enrico Montefusco8, Nicola Polverelli12, Cristina Santoro2, Massimo Breccia2, Giuseppe Cimino13, Ignazio Majolino7, Maria Gabriella Mazzucconi2, Nicola Vianelli12, Giuliana Alimena2, Marco Montanaro11, Francesca Palandri12.   

Abstract

Spleen enlargement, present in 10-20% of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) patients at diagnosis, is a feature clinically easy to assess, confirmable by echography with a very low chance of misinterpretation. Nonetheless, the clinical and prognostic role of splenomegaly has been seldom evaluated. From 1979 to 2013, 1297 ET patients retrospectively collected in the database of the Lazio Cooperative Group and Bologna University Hospital were evaluable for spleen enlargement at diagnosis and included in the analysis. On the whole, spleen was enlarged in 172/1297 (13.0%) patients; in most cases (94.8%) splenomegaly was mild (≤5 cm). Patients with splenomegaly were younger, predominantly male, presented higher platelet count and JAK2V617F allele burden and had a lower incidence of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. At least one thrombotic event during follow-up occurred in 97/1,125 (8.6%) patients without spleen enlargement compared to 27/172 (15.7%) patients with spleen enlargement (P = 0.003). Despite comparable use of cytoreductive/antiplatelet therapies in the two groups, the cumulative risk of thrombosis at 5 years was significantly higher in patients with baseline splenomegaly (9.8% versus 4.4% in patients without splenomegaly, P = 0.012). In multivariate analysis exploring risk factors for thrombosis, splenomegaly retained its negative prognostic role, together with previous thrombosis, leucocyte count and male gender. Baseline splenomegaly seems to be an independent additional risk factor for thrombosis in nonstrictly WHO-defined ET patients. This data could be useful in the real-life clinical management of these patients.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26748894     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  10 in total

1.  Leukocytosis and thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Carobbio; Alberto Ferrari; Arianna Masciulli; Arianna Ghirardi; Giovanni Barosi; Tiziano Barbui
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-06-11

Review 2.  Assessing the thrombotic risk of patients with essential thrombocythemia in the genomic era.

Authors:  L Falchi; H M Kantarjian; S Verstovsek
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Characteristics of myeloproliferative neoplasms in patients exposed to ionizing radiation following the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

Authors:  Larysa Poluben; Maneka Puligandla; Donna Neuberg; Christine R Bryke; Yahsuan Hsu; Oleksandr Shumeiko; Xin Yuan; Olga Voznesensky; German Pihan; Miriam Adam; Ernest Fraenkel; Roni Rasnic; Michal Linial; Sergiy Klymenko; Steven P Balk; Paula G Fraenkel
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Prognostication in Philadelphia Chromosome Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: a Review of the Recent Literature.

Authors:  Amy Zhou; Amber Afzal; Stephen T Oh
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.952

5.  Splanchnic vein thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk factors for recurrences in a cohort of 181 patients.

Authors:  V De Stefano; A M Vannucchi; M Ruggeri; F Cervantes; A Alvarez-Larrán; A Iurlo; M L Randi; L Pieri; E Rossi; P Guglielmelli; S Betti; E Elli; M C Finazzi; G Finazzi; E Zetterberg; N Vianelli; G Gaidano; I Nichele; D Cattaneo; M Palova; M H Ellis; E Cacciola; A Tieghi; J C Hernandez-Boluda; E Pungolino; G Specchia; D Rapezzi; A Forcina; C Musolino; A Carobbio; M Griesshammer; T Barbui
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 11.037

6.  Risk factors for arterial versus venous thrombosis in polycythemia vera: a single center experience in 587 patients.

Authors:  S Cerquozzi; D Barraco; T Lasho; C Finke; C A Hanson; R P Ketterling; A Pardanani; N Gangat; A Tefferi
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 11.037

7.  Splenomegaly impacts prognosis in essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera: A single center study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Accurso; Marco Santoro; Simona Raso; Angelo Davide Contrino; Paolo Casimiro; Florinda Di Piazza; Alessandro Perez; Antonio Russo; Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2019-12-04

Review 8.  Low-Risk Essential Thrombocythemia: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Andrew J Robinson; Anna L Godfrey
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2021-01-27

9.  Triple-Negativity Identifies a Subgroup of Patients with Better Overall Survival in Essential Thrombocythemia.

Authors:  Marco Santoro; Vincenzo Accurso; Salvatrice Mancuso; Mariasanta Napolitano; Marta Mattana; Giorgia Vajana; Federica Russello; Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Hematol Rep       Date:  2022-08-24

10.  [Risk factors for recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia].

Authors:  X Han; B B Bai; C J Wang; S Zhao; Y Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-01-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.