Literature DB >> 26748390

The accuracy of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nehalennia van Hanegem1, Marileen M C Prins2, Marlies Y Bongers3, Brent C Opmeer4, Daljit Singh Sahota5, Ben Willem J Mol6, Anne Timmermans2.   

Abstract

Postmenopausal bleeding (PMB) can be the first sign of endometrial cancer. In case of thickened endometrium, endometrial sampling is often used in these women. In this systematic review, we studied the accuracy of endometrial sampling for the diagnoses of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and endometrial disease (endometrial pathology, including benign polyps). We systematically searched the literature for studies comparing the results of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding with two different reference standards: blind dilatation and curettage (D&C) and hysteroscopy with histology. We assessed the quality of the detected studies by the QUADAS-2 tool. For each included study, we calculated the fraction of women in whom endometrial sampling failed. Furthermore, we extracted numbers of cases of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and endometrial disease that were identified or missed by endometrial sampling. We detected 12 studies reporting on 1029 women with postmenopausal bleeding: five studies with dilatation and curettage (D&C) and seven studies with hysteroscopy as a reference test. The weighted sensitivity of endometrial sampling with D&C as a reference for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer was 100% (range 100-100%) and 92% (71-100) for the diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia. Only one study reported sensitivity for endometrial disease, which was 76%. When hysteroscopy was used as a reference, weighted sensitivities of endometrial sampling were 90% (range 50-100), 82% (range 56-94) and 39% (21-69) for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer, atypical hyperplasia and endometrial disease, respectively. For all diagnosis studied and the reference test used, specificity was 98-100%. The weighted failure rate of endometrial sampling was 11% (range 1-53%), while insufficient samples were found in 31% (range 7-76%). In these women with insufficient or failed samples, an endometrial (pre) cancer was found in 7% (range 0-18%). In women with postmenopausal bleeding, the sensitivity of endometrial sampling to detect endometrial cancer and especially atypical hyperplasia and endometrial disease, including endometrial polyps, is lower than previously thought. Therefore, further diagnostic work-up for focal pathology is warranted, after a benign result of endometrial sampling.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnostic accuracy; Endometrial cancer; Endometrial sampling; Hysteroscopy; Sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26748390     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  30 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yashar Moharamzad; Amir H Davarpanah; Ali Yaghobi Joybari; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Leila Esmaeilian Toosi; Melika Kooshkiforooshani; Ali Ansari; Morteza Sanei Taheri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-15

2.  Accuracy of pre-operative hysteroscopic guided biopsy for predicting final pathology in uterine malignancies.

Authors:  Fabio Martinelli; Antonino Ditto; Giorgio Bogani; Mauro Signorelli; Valentina Chiappa; Domenica Lorusso; Edward Haeusler; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Association of Endometrial Cancer Risk With Postmenopausal Bleeding in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Beverly J Long; Arena Del Mar Morillo; Marc Arbyn; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Multiparametric transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer in post-menopausal bleeding: diagnostic performance of a transvaginal algorithm and reproducibility amongst less experienced observers.

Authors:  Shimaa Abdalla; Hisham Abou-Taleb; Dalia M Badary; Wageeh A Ali
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Long-term risk of endometrial cancer following postmenopausal bleeding and reassuring endometrial biopsy.

Authors:  Nicole C M Visser; Ellen M Sparidaens; Jan-Willem van den Brink; Maria C Breijer; Erik A Boss; Sebastiaan Veersema; Albert G Siebers; Johan Bulten; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Ruud L M Bekkers
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Endometrial Cytology as a Method to Improve the Accuracy of Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: Case Report and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Qi Wang; Lanbo Zhao; Lu Han; Chao Sun; Sijia Ma; Huilian Hou; Qing Song; Qiling Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Endometrial Sampling for Preoperative Diagnosis of Uterine Leiomyosarcoma.

Authors:  Rosanne M Kho; Vrunda B Desai; Peter E Schwartz; Jason D Wright; Cary P Gross; Lindsey M Hutchison; Francis P Boscoe; Haiqun Lin; Xiao Xu
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Importance of Cervical Elongation Assessment for Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Mikihisa Onigahara; Shintaro Yanazume; Takashi Ushiwaka; Shinichi Togami; Masaki Kamio; Hiroaki Kobayashi
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2021-04-30

9.  Improved adequacy of endometrial tissue sampled from postmenopausal women using the MyoSure Lite hysteroscopic tissue removal system versus conventional curettage.

Authors:  Peter Rosenblatt; Sara Barcia; Anthony DiSciullo; Hussein Warda
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-10-27

10.  Incidence and risk factors for insufficient endometrial tissue from endometrial sampling.

Authors:  Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Pilaiwan Kleebkaow; Chumnan Kietpeerakool
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.