Literature DB >> 28247037

Accuracy of pre-operative hysteroscopic guided biopsy for predicting final pathology in uterine malignancies.

Fabio Martinelli1, Antonino Ditto2, Giorgio Bogani2, Mauro Signorelli2, Valentina Chiappa2, Domenica Lorusso2, Edward Haeusler3, Francesco Raspagliesi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate concordance (C) between pre-operative hysteroscopic-directed sampling and final pathology in uterine cancers.
METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional evaluation of prospectively collected data of women who underwent hysterectomy for uterine malignancies and a previous hysteroscopic-guided biopsy was performed. Diagnostic concordance between pre-operative (hysteroscopic biopsy) and postoperative (uterine specimen) histology was evaluated. In endometrioid-endometrial cancers cases Kappa (k) statistics was applied to evaluate agreement for grading (G) between the preoperative and final pathology.
RESULTS: A total 101 hysterectomies for uterine malignancies were evaluated. There were 23 non-endometrioid cancers: 7 serous (C:5/7, 71.4%); 10 carcinosarcomas (C:7/10, 70%, remaining 3 cases only epithelial component diagnosed); 3 clear cell (C:3/3, 100%); 3 sarcomas (C:3/3, 100%). In 78 cases an endometrioid endometrial cancer was found. In 63 cases there was a histological C (63/78, 80.8%) between hysteroscopic-guided biopsy and final pathology, while in 15 cases (19.2%) only hyperplasia (with/without atypia) was found preoperatively. Overall accuracy to detect endometrial cancer was 80.2%. In 50 out of 63 endometrial cancers (79.4%) grading was concordant. The overall level of agreement between preoperative and postoperative grading was "substantial" according to Kappa (k) statistics (k 0.64; 95% CI: 0.449-0.83; p < 0.001), as well as for G1 (0.679; 95% CI: 0.432-0.926; p < 0.001) and G3 (0.774; 94% CI: 0.534-1; p < 0.001), while for G2 (0.531; 95% CI: 0.286-0.777; p < 0.001) it was moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: In our series we found an 80% C between pre-operative hysteroscopic-guided biopsy and final pathology, in uterine malignancies. Moreover, hysteroscopic biopsy accurately predicted endometrial cancer in 80% of cases and "substantially" predicted histological grading. Hysteroscopic-guided uterine sampling could be a useful tool to tailor treatment in patients with uterine malignancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial cancer; Endometrial cancer grading; Hysteroscopy; Surgical pathology; Uterine cancers

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28247037     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2371-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  17 in total

1.  Detection and correlation of pre-operative, frozen section, and final pathology in high-risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  M J Kanis; J Rahaman; E L Moshier; K Zakashansky; L Chuang; V Kolev
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.196

2.  Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling diagnosis for predicting the final pathology grading in uterine endometrioid carcinoma.

Authors:  T P Batista; C L C Cavalcanti; A A G Tejo; A L R Bezerra
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.424

3.  Sentinel node mapping using hysteroscopic injection of indocyanine green and laparoscopic near-infrared fluorescence imaging in endometrial cancer staging.

Authors:  Antonino Ditto; Fabio Martinelli; Giorgio Bogani; Andrea Papadia; Domenica Lorusso; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Hysteroscopy in women with abnormal uterine bleeding: a meta-analysis on four major endometrial pathologies.

Authors:  Fani Gkrozou; George Dimakopoulos; Thomas Vrekoussis; Lazaros Lavasidis; Anastasios Koutlas; Iordanis Navrozoglou; Theodore Stefos; Minas Paschopoulos
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node in endometrial cancer by using hysteroscopic injection of radiolabeled tracer.

Authors:  Eugenio Solima; Fabio Martinelli; Antonino Ditto; Marco Maccauro; Marialuisa Carcangiu; Luigi Mariani; Shigeki Kusamura; Rosanna Fontanelli; Barbara Grijuela; Francesco Raspagliesi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  The utility of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of uterine sarcomas.

Authors:  Nisha Bansal; Thomas J Herzog; William Burke; Carmel J Cohen; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  L Helpman; R Kupets; A Covens; R S Saad; M A Khalifa; N Ismiil; Z Ghorab; V Dubé; S Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Endometrial sampling devices for early diagnosis of endometrial lesions.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Yaling Li; Shulan Lv; Qing Wang; Chao Sun; Xin Dong; Ming He; Qurat Ulain; Yongxing Yuan; Xiaoqian Tuo; Nasra Batchu; Qing Song; Qiling Li
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.553

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Simone Bruni; Benito Chiofalo; Gaetano Riemma; Ricardo Bassil Lasmar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for differentiating endometrial carcinoma from benign lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yashar Moharamzad; Amir H Davarpanah; Ali Yaghobi Joybari; Fatemeh Shahbazi; Leila Esmaeilian Toosi; Melika Kooshkiforooshani; Ali Ansari; Morteza Sanei Taheri
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-15

3.  Clinicopathological and survival analysis of uterine papillary serous carcinoma: a single institutional review of 106 cases.

Authors:  Yao Wang; Mei Yu; Jia-Xin Yang; Dong-Yan Cao; Keng Shen; Jing-He Lang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Accuracy of preoperative sampling diagnosis for predicting final pathology in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  David Lukanović; Miha Matjašič; Borut Kobal
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

5.  Impact of endometrial sampling technique and biopsy volume on the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Federico Ferrari; Sara Forte; Giulia Arrigoni; Laura Ardighieri; Maria Consuelo Coppola; Federica Salinaro; Fabio Barra; Enrico Sartori; Franco Odicino
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.