Literature DB >> 26745935

Low drive field amplitude for improved image resolution in magnetic particle imaging.

Laura R Croft1, Patrick W Goodwill1, Justin J Konkle1, Hamed Arami2, Daniel A Price1, Ada X Li1, Emine U Saritas3, Steven M Conolly1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a new imaging technology that directly detects superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The technique has potential medical applications in angiography, cell tracking, and cancer detection. In this paper, the authors explore how nanoparticle relaxation affects image resolution. Historically, researchers have analyzed nanoparticle behavior by studying the time constant of the nanoparticle physical rotation. In contrast, in this paper, the authors focus instead on how the time constant of nanoparticle rotation affects the final image resolution, and this reveals nonobvious conclusions for tailoring MPI imaging parameters for optimal spatial resolution.
METHODS: The authors first extend x-space systems theory to include nanoparticle relaxation. The authors then measure the spatial resolution and relative signal levels in an MPI relaxometer and a 3D MPI imager at multiple drive field amplitudes and frequencies. Finally, these image measurements are used to estimate relaxation times and nanoparticle phase lags.
RESULTS: The authors demonstrate that spatial resolution, as measured by full-width at half-maximum, improves at lower drive field amplitudes. The authors further determine that relaxation in MPI can be approximated as a frequency-independent phase lag. These results enable the authors to accurately predict MPI resolution and sensitivity across a wide range of drive field amplitudes and frequencies.
CONCLUSIONS: To balance resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, specific absorption rate, and magnetostimulation requirements, the drive field can be a low amplitude and high frequency. Continued research into how the MPI drive field affects relaxation and its adverse effects will be crucial for developing new nanoparticles tailored to the unique physics of MPI. Moreover, this theory informs researchers how to design scanning sequences to minimize relaxation-induced blurring for better spatial resolution or to exploit relaxation-induced blurring for MPI with molecular contrast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26745935      PMCID: PMC4698123          DOI: 10.1118/1.4938097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  32 in total

1.  An x-space magnetic particle imaging scanner.

Authors:  Patrick W Goodwill; Kuan Lu; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.523

2.  Tomographic imaging using the nonlinear response of magnetic particles.

Authors:  Bernhard Gleich; Jürgen Weizenecker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  A simulation study on the resolution and sensitivity of magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  J Weizenecker; J Borgert; B Gleich
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimizing magnetite nanoparticles for mass sensitivity in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  R Matthew Ferguson; Kevin R Minard; Amit P Khandhar; Kannan M Krishnan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Electronic field free line rotation and relaxation deconvolution in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Klaas Bente; Matthias Weber; Matthias Graeser; Timo F Sattel; Marlitt Erbe; Thorsten M Buzug
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Magnetostimulation limits in magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; George Z Zhang; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Multidimensional x-space magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Patrick W Goodwill; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Chronic kidney disease, mortality, and treatment strategies among patients with clinically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Donal N Reddan; Lynda Anne Szczech; Robert H Tuttle; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Jones; Steve J Schwab; Mark Stafford Smith; Robert M Califf; Daniel B Mark; William F Owen
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 9.  Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) for NMR and MRI researchers.

Authors:  Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Laura R Croft; Justin J Konkle; Kuan Lu; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Projection reconstruction magnetic particle imaging.

Authors:  Justin J Konkle; Patrick W Goodwill; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  15 in total

1.  Pulsed Excitation in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Jie Ma; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Steven Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Benchtop magnetic particle relaxometer for detection, characterization and analysis of magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Nicolas Garraud; Rohan Dhavalikar; Mythreyi Unni; Shehaab Savliwala; Carlos Rinaldi; David P Arnold
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Magnetic Particle Imaging-Guided Heating in Vivo Using Gradient Fields for Arbitrary Localization of Magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Andreina Chiu-Lam; Daniel W Hensley; Rohan Dhavalikar; Xinyi Y Zhou; Elaine Y Yu; Patrick W Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  The Relaxation Wall: Experimental Limits to Improving MPI Spatial Resolution by Increasing Nanoparticle Core size.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel W Hensley; Erika C Vreeland; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  Finite magnetic relaxation in x-space magnetic particle imaging: Comparison of measurements and ferrohydrodynamic models.

Authors:  R Dhavalikar; D Hensley; L Maldonado-Camargo; L R Croft; S Ceron; P W Goodwill; S M Conolly; C Rinaldi
Journal:  J Phys D Appl Phys       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.207

6.  Combining magnetic particle imaging and magnetic fluid hyperthermia in a theranostic platform.

Authors:  Daniel Hensley; Zhi Wei Tay; Rohan Dhavalikar; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven Conolly
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Seeing SPIOs Directly In Vivo with Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Bo Zheng; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Kuan Lu; Justin J Konkle; Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Xinyi Y Zhou; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; John D Hazle; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Magnetic Particle Imaging Is a Sensitive In Vivo Imaging Modality for the Detection of Dendritic Cell Migration.

Authors:  Julia J Gevaert; Corby Fink; Jimmy D Dikeakos; Gregory A Dekaban; Paula J Foster
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Optimization of Drive Parameters for Resolution, Sensitivity and Safety in Magnetic Particle Imaging.

Authors:  Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel W Hensley; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 10.  A perspective on a rapid and radiation-free tracer imaging modality, magnetic particle imaging, with promise for clinical translation.

Authors:  Prashant Chandrasekharan; Zhi Wei Tay; Xinyi Yedda Zhou; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Daniel Hensley; Quincy Huynh; K L Barry Fung; Caylin Colson VanHook; Patrick Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Steven Conolly
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.