Laura R Croft1, Patrick W Goodwill1, Justin J Konkle1, Hamed Arami2, Daniel A Price1, Ada X Li1, Emine U Saritas3, Steven M Conolly1. 1. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720-1762. 2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-2120. 3. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a new imaging technology that directly detects superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The technique has potential medical applications in angiography, cell tracking, and cancer detection. In this paper, the authors explore how nanoparticle relaxation affects image resolution. Historically, researchers have analyzed nanoparticle behavior by studying the time constant of the nanoparticle physical rotation. In contrast, in this paper, the authors focus instead on how the time constant of nanoparticle rotation affects the final image resolution, and this reveals nonobvious conclusions for tailoring MPI imaging parameters for optimal spatial resolution. METHODS: The authors first extend x-space systems theory to include nanoparticle relaxation. The authors then measure the spatial resolution and relative signal levels in an MPI relaxometer and a 3D MPI imager at multiple drive field amplitudes and frequencies. Finally, these image measurements are used to estimate relaxation times and nanoparticle phase lags. RESULTS: The authors demonstrate that spatial resolution, as measured by full-width at half-maximum, improves at lower drive field amplitudes. The authors further determine that relaxation in MPI can be approximated as a frequency-independent phase lag. These results enable the authors to accurately predict MPI resolution and sensitivity across a wide range of drive field amplitudes and frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: To balance resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, specific absorption rate, and magnetostimulation requirements, the drive field can be a low amplitude and high frequency. Continued research into how the MPI drive field affects relaxation and its adverse effects will be crucial for developing new nanoparticles tailored to the unique physics of MPI. Moreover, this theory informs researchers how to design scanning sequences to minimize relaxation-induced blurring for better spatial resolution or to exploit relaxation-induced blurring for MPI with molecular contrast.
PURPOSE: Magnetic particle imaging (MPI) is a new imaging technology that directly detects superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. The technique has potential medical applications in angiography, cell tracking, and cancer detection. In this paper, the authors explore how nanoparticle relaxation affects image resolution. Historically, researchers have analyzed nanoparticle behavior by studying the time constant of the nanoparticle physical rotation. In contrast, in this paper, the authors focus instead on how the time constant of nanoparticle rotation affects the final image resolution, and this reveals nonobvious conclusions for tailoring MPI imaging parameters for optimal spatial resolution. METHODS: The authors first extend x-space systems theory to include nanoparticle relaxation. The authors then measure the spatial resolution and relative signal levels in an MPI relaxometer and a 3D MPI imager at multiple drive field amplitudes and frequencies. Finally, these image measurements are used to estimate relaxation times and nanoparticle phase lags. RESULTS: The authors demonstrate that spatial resolution, as measured by full-width at half-maximum, improves at lower drive field amplitudes. The authors further determine that relaxation in MPI can be approximated as a frequency-independent phase lag. These results enable the authors to accurately predict MPI resolution and sensitivity across a wide range of drive field amplitudes and frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: To balance resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, specific absorption rate, and magnetostimulation requirements, the drive field can be a low amplitude and high frequency. Continued research into how the MPI drive field affects relaxation and its adverse effects will be crucial for developing new nanoparticles tailored to the unique physics of MPI. Moreover, this theory informs researchers how to design scanning sequences to minimize relaxation-induced blurring for better spatial resolution or to exploit relaxation-induced blurring for MPI with molecular contrast.
Authors: Klaas Bente; Matthias Weber; Matthias Graeser; Timo F Sattel; Marlitt Erbe; Thorsten M Buzug Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Donal N Reddan; Lynda Anne Szczech; Robert H Tuttle; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Jones; Steve J Schwab; Mark Stafford Smith; Robert M Califf; Daniel B Mark; William F Owen Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; Laura R Croft; Justin J Konkle; Kuan Lu; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Justin J Konkle; Patrick W Goodwill; Oscar M Carrasco-Zevallos; Steven M Conolly Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Jie Ma; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Steven Conolly Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Nicolas Garraud; Rohan Dhavalikar; Mythreyi Unni; Shehaab Savliwala; Carlos Rinaldi; David P Arnold Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Zhi Wei Tay; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Andreina Chiu-Lam; Daniel W Hensley; Rohan Dhavalikar; Xinyi Y Zhou; Elaine Y Yu; Patrick W Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven M Conolly Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: R Dhavalikar; D Hensley; L Maldonado-Camargo; L R Croft; S Ceron; P W Goodwill; S M Conolly; C Rinaldi Journal: J Phys D Appl Phys Date: 2016-07-11 Impact factor: 3.207
Authors: Daniel Hensley; Zhi Wei Tay; Rohan Dhavalikar; Bo Zheng; Patrick Goodwill; Carlos Rinaldi; Steven Conolly Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Bo Zheng; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Kuan Lu; Justin J Konkle; Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel Hensley; Xinyi Y Zhou; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Emine U Saritas; Patrick W Goodwill; John D Hazle; Steven M Conolly Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Julia J Gevaert; Corby Fink; Jimmy D Dikeakos; Gregory A Dekaban; Paula J Foster Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Zhi Wei Tay; Daniel W Hensley; Prashant Chandrasekharan; Bo Zheng; Steven M Conolly Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Prashant Chandrasekharan; Zhi Wei Tay; Xinyi Yedda Zhou; Elaine Yu; Ryan Orendorff; Daniel Hensley; Quincy Huynh; K L Barry Fung; Caylin Colson VanHook; Patrick Goodwill; Bo Zheng; Steven Conolly Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.039