Jay H Lubin1, David Couper, Pamela L Lutsey, Mark Woodward, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Rachel R Huxley. 1. From the aScientist Emeritus, Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; bClinical Professor and Deputy Director, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC; cAssistant Professor, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN; dProfessor of Biostatistics, The George Institute for Global Health, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; eThe George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; fDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; gProfessor, Department of Public Health, Fujita Health University School of Medicine Toyoake Aichi, Japan; and hProfessor, School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Relative risks (RRs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by smoking rate exhibit a concave pattern, with RRs in low rate smokers exceeding a linear extrapolation from higher rate smokers. However, cigarettes/day does not by itself fully characterize smoking-related risks. A reexamination of the concave pattern using a comprehensive representation of smoking may enhance insights. METHODS: Data were from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a prospective cohort enrolled in four areas of the US in 1987-1989. Follow-up was through 2008. Analyses included 14,233 participants, 245,915 person-years, and 3,411 CVD events. RESULTS: The concave RRs with cigarettes/day were consistent with cigarettes/day modifying a linear RR association of pack-years with CVD (i.e., strength of the pack-years association depended on cigarettes/day, indicating that the manner of pack-years accrual impacted risk). Smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration (P < 0.01). For 50 pack-years (365,000 cigarettes), estimated RRs of CVD were 2.1 for accrual at 20 cigarettes/day and 1.6 for accrual at 50 cigarettes/day. Years since smoking cessation did not alter the diminishing strength of association with increasing cigarettes/day. Analyses that accounted for competing risks did not affect findings. CONCLUSION: Pack-years remained the primary determinant of smoking-related CVD risk; however, accrual influenced RRs. For equal pack-years, smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration. This observation provides clues to better understanding the biological mechanisms, and reinforces the importance of cessation rather than smoking less to reduce CVD risk.
BACKGROUND: Relative risks (RRs) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) by smoking rate exhibit a concave pattern, with RRs in low rate smokers exceeding a linear extrapolation from higher rate smokers. However, cigarettes/day does not by itself fully characterize smoking-related risks. A reexamination of the concave pattern using a comprehensive representation of smoking may enhance insights. METHODS: Data were from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a prospective cohort enrolled in four areas of the US in 1987-1989. Follow-up was through 2008. Analyses included 14,233 participants, 245,915 person-years, and 3,411 CVD events. RESULTS: The concave RRs with cigarettes/day were consistent with cigarettes/day modifying a linear RR association of pack-years with CVD (i.e., strength of the pack-years association depended on cigarettes/day, indicating that the manner of pack-years accrual impacted risk). Smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration (P < 0.01). For 50 pack-years (365,000 cigarettes), estimated RRs of CVD were 2.1 for accrual at 20 cigarettes/day and 1.6 for accrual at 50 cigarettes/day. Years since smoking cessation did not alter the diminishing strength of association with increasing cigarettes/day. Analyses that accounted for competing risks did not affect findings. CONCLUSION: Pack-years remained the primary determinant of smoking-related CVD risk; however, accrual influenced RRs. For equal pack-years, smoking fewer cigarettes/day for longer duration was more deleterious than smoking more cigarettes/day for shorter duration. This observation provides clues to better understanding the biological mechanisms, and reinforces the importance of cessation rather than smoking less to reduce CVD risk.
Authors: Richard J O'Connor; Gary A Giovino; Lynn T Kozlowski; Saul Shiffman; Andrew Hyland; John T Bernert; Ralph S Caraballo; K Michael Cummings Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J P Richie; S G Carmella; J E Muscat; D G Scott; S A Akerkar; S S Hecht Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jay H Lubin; Neil Caporaso; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Anne M Joseph; Stephen S Hecht Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Surya P Bhatt; Young-Il Kim; Kathy F Harrington; John E Hokanson; Sharon M Lutz; Michael H Cho; Dawn L DeMeo; James M Wells; Barry J Make; Stephen I Rennard; George R Washko; Marilyn G Foreman; Donald P Tashkin; Robert A Wise; Mark T Dransfield; William C Bailey Journal: Thorax Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Maki Inoue-Choi; Linda M Liao; Carolyn Reyes-Guzman; Patricia Hartge; Neil Caporaso; Neal D Freedman Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel J Conklin; Suzaynn Schick; Michael J Blaha; Alex Carll; Andrew DeFilippis; Peter Ganz; Michael E Hall; Naomi Hamburg; Tim O'Toole; Lindsay Reynolds; Sanjay Srivastava; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.733